Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfsense / HE tunnel / client vm problem

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    29 Posts 3 Posters 3.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz
      Understood. fe80 is local-link.
      Why is pfsense not providing the GW?
      Why does ping6 work? DNS works. The ipv6 address for DNS is the LAN interface on pfsense.

      I don't like Windows (not wanting to start a comment war), but it works. I only turned off ipv4 in the properties. It is set to get ipv6 automatically.

      Next is to try setting the default route manually. Would that be the address of the LAN nic on pfsense?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        capt_scurrrvy
        last edited by

        Side question:
        Is there a way to edit the title of this thread? I noticed today I typed psfense instead of pfsense.

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
          last edited by johnpoz

          Um so windows got a global address? If all your linux has a link-local, still not going anywhere even if it uses a link-local gateway. Unless you natted your link-local ipv6 to a global ipv6. Which isn't how it works ;)

          Lets see the output of windows ipconfig /all

          edit: I edited your title for you.

          Also show us the ifconfig for you linux.. Here is my linux box with working IPv6

          global.png

          See how it has a global address, along with its link local address.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz
            I believe what you are asking for is in the post above. Under Windows 8 config.
            I don't remember if that was ipconfig or ipconfig /all. The routes are there too.

            Thanks.

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
              last edited by johnpoz

              Sorry I missed that - yeah it has a global address.. Does your linux?

              edit: Oh missed that too - it does.. But your routing table is not correct..

              Here for example is my default route on actual interface

              route.png

              It can point to the link-local of your gateway. But not going to work on your lo interface.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz
                In that same post is my test Centos 8 vm. It did get assigned an address, but from the route list, doesn't look like the default route gets set.

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
                  last edited by

                  Your default is set, but only for lo - which never going to work.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz
                    So is that Centos failing to request a route from the pfsense DHCP6 server or similarly failing to get the pfsense router advertisement?

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
                      last edited by

                      Clients do not get "routes" from dhcpv6.. Not how IPv6 works. RA is used..

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz
                        Does that mean pfsense's router advertisement is not sending the information?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          capt_scurrrvy
                          last edited by

                          I noticed the fe80 address of the LAN nic of pfsense is being set automatically as the default route on the linux box.

                          [root@localhost ~]# ip -6 route
                          unreachable ::/96 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          2001:470:1f1d:bc::ff04 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 100 pref medium
                          2001:470:1f1d:bc::/64 dev eth1 proto ra metric 100 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:a00::/24 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:7f00::/24 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:a9fe::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:ac10::/28 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:c0a8::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 2002:e000::/19 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          unreachable 3ffe:ffff::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                          fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 100 pref medium
                          fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
                          default via fe80::8802:71ff:fe34:93cb dev eth1 proto ra metric 100 pref medium
                          

                          I don't understand why that would happen.

                          The ifcg_eth1 file

                          DEFROUTE=yes
                          IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
                          IPV6INIT=yes
                          IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
                          IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
                          IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
                          IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            capt_scurrrvy
                            last edited by

                            Still trying to figure out why I can't get non Windows machines to communication via ipv6.

                            On pfsense, I have disabled DHCPv6 and Router Advertisements.

                            On the Centos vm, I statically set the ipv6 address and the gateway.

                            Just as previously, the VM can:
                            ping6
                            (this even does the correct DNS lookup)

                            traceroute6 and tracepath6 both show going out the Hurricane Electric tunnel.

                            Just as previously, the VM cannot:
                            Use a browser to view cnn, google, redhat.

                            I even put an allow any type rule on the pfsense WAN, LAN, and WANv6.
                            I disabled the firewall running on Centos.

                            It is as if TCP is not working. However, tcpdump shows traffic.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz
                              Upgraded to 2.5.0. Had to manually add the default route for my ipv4 gateway on the WAN. See Default gateway can not be created with GUI

                              Surprise, Firefox on CentOS VM started to get to ipv6 web sites. This is with a manually assigned ipv6 for CentOS. Not sure what has changed between 2.4.5 and 2.5.

                              GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GertjanG
                                Gertjan @capt_scurrrvy
                                last edited by

                                I upgraded this morning my main 'company' pfSense to 2.5.0.
                                I'm using he.net for my my IPv6 'needs'.

                                I had nothing to do.

                                Everything came up and was working fine.
                                ( + captive portal using FreeRadius - OpenVPN server for my remote access).

                                Even a non-native package I installed many years ago was upgraded and kept on running.

                                No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.