Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Extremely Frustrating Outages

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    44 Posts 5 Posters 7.7k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      Stewart @JKnott
      last edited by

      @jknott

      What I was posting you can start seeing around packet 1190. But yes, lots of DNS. I don't know how normal it is. In fact, to look through the capture I used !(dns) as a filter.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        Stewart @JKnott
        last edited by

        @jknott Have you had a chance to look anymore? Anything you see?

        JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JKnottJ Offline
          JKnott @Stewart
          last edited by

          @stewart

          The one curious thing I see is about 35 duplicate acks that a device on Spectrum (I assume that's you) to Cloudfront. That would indicate a lost ack at the Cloudfront end. That's about all I see.

          PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
          i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
          UniFi AC-Lite access point

          I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            Stewart @JKnott
            last edited by

            @jknott @stephenw10

            I went through all of the logs for all of our installs and identified a few other sites that appeared to be experiencing something similar. Going on the theory that maybe we are overloading the modem and the large number of DNS packets seen in the captures, I've switched Ubound from Resolver to Forwarder in a some of the units having issues. Since I have OpenDNS in the General tab I also disabled DNSSEC. After a couple of days I can see a trend where the issues have settled down tremendously. It's been enough that I don't think it's coincidence. Any thoughts?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S Offline
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Could be. There are some modems that are known to badly handle a lot of UDP traffic. (Intel PUMA based).

              What modems are you using?

              Steve

              chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • chpalmerC Offline
                chpalmer @stephenw10
                last edited by

                What brand and model modem are you using? Is it a "gateway" type modem that the ISP has in their style of "bridge mode"? It makes a difference.

                Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  Stewart @chpalmer
                  last edited by

                  @chpalmer @stephenw10

                  At the site I was looking through logs with @JKnott, this is the info provided in the modem:

                  ARRIS DOCSIS 3.0 / PacketCable 2.0 Touchstone Residential Gateway
                  HW_REV: 8
                  VENDOR: ARRIS Group, Inc.
                  BOOTR: 4.2.0.45
                  SW_REV: 9.1.103J6TW2.SIP.PC20.TW
                  MODEL: TG1682G
                  

                  I don't know about the other sites. Also, the initial site I was having problems with (that was fixed by removing the laptops from the wireless) went through several model of modems. I believe it is currently also using a TG1682G. In most cases the modems are configure as RIP w/o NAT. In some instances where there is no Static IP then they are in Bridge mode.

                  chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chpalmerC Offline
                    chpalmer @Stewart
                    last edited by

                    @stewart said in Extremely Frustrating Outages:

                    TG1682G

                    Thanks Stewart. Yes definitely a Puma model. https://badmodems.com/Forum/app.php/badmodems

                    If Spectrum has not updated firmware on these models.. then you can blame the modem.

                    Unless you can get Spectrum to provide a non Puma model you can continue to expect problems. Many issues have been fixed by the firmware fixes but many problems persist.

                    Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      Stewart @chpalmer
                      last edited by Stewart

                      @chpalmer said in Extremely Frustrating Outages:

                      @stewart said in Extremely Frustrating Outages:

                      TG1682G

                      Thanks Stewart. Yes definitely a Puma model. https://badmodems.com/Forum/app.php/badmodems

                      If Spectrum has not updated firmware on these models.. then you can blame the modem.

                      Unless you can get Spectrum to provide a non Puma model you can continue to expect problems. Many issues have been fixed by the firmware fixes but many problems persist.

                      That's really nice of you; thinking that Spectrum will update their modem's firmware! We once fought with them for months, even trying to install our own modems, because they had a firmware that broke SIP. (I think that was the TG1672 model) Happened all over across many of our clients. The only solution we found was to run SIP over SSL so it wouldn't know what the traffic was. Even had clients switch VOIP providers because their existing provider couldn't (or wouldn't) do it over SSL. That was with SIP ALG off, Firewall off, etc. Now they look back and laugh at all the headaches it caused but back then they wouldn't take any responsibility for it.

                      Can you explain what PUMA means?
                      Edit: I put in the IP of the modem and it does indeed cause the same high packet loss and latency I've been experiencing.

                      chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chpalmerC Offline
                        chpalmer @Stewart
                        last edited by

                        @stewart

                        If you haven't look over that Badmodems site and familiarize yourself with the issue.

                        Ive had to change out a bunch of modems for customers around my area due to similar issues.

                        Get a Broadcom based modem if you can.. Im doubtful though with the static IP's you are using but you have to ask. Im not familiar with Spectrum and how they hand out multiples..

                        Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          Stewart @chpalmer
                          last edited by

                          @chpalmer

                          Unfortunately, Spectrum only allows you to bring your own modem on a residential account. On a Business account you must use their modems. You now get the lottery of either the TB1682G or a new Spectrum branded 2 box solution.

                          chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • chpalmerC Offline
                            chpalmer @Stewart
                            last edited by

                            @stewart

                            Thanks! Adding that information to my knowledge base.. Luckily I only have one customer on Spectrum in North Carolina and they are residential customers. Motorola MB8600 on their account.

                            Ill I can say is escalate escalate escalate! Enough input by customers and customers reps finally got Comcast to allow COE on their business accounts as long as static IP's are not involved.

                            Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                            Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S Offline
                              Stewart @chpalmer
                              last edited by

                              @chpalmer Escalating with Spectrum gives me "Call us again on this and we'll bill you for coming out." I've had multiple techs go out to both sites. The techs that go on site say they put the modem in their "SCOPE" system which puts them in Device Watch. That allows the techs to go back and look at history for the unit. BUT, when you call in and talk to a CSR every one of them says that they no longer use that system. Only the techs onsite can setup or see into the SCOPE system now but you can't get a tech onsite without the possibility of them billing for every visit. Even then they just troubleshoot the moment and don't even refer to it unless you make it a point to make them. It's crazy. But still better than every DSL provider and AT&T U-Verse in this area. You pick your poison.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S Offline
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Maybe try using DNSoverTLS so you're not sending UDP DNS packets at all.
                                If that improves things further at least it's another data point.

                                Steve

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S Offline
                                  Stewart @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10 said in Extremely Frustrating Outages:

                                  Maybe try using DNSoverTLS so you're not sending UDP DNS packets at all.
                                  If that improves things further at least it's another data point.

                                  Steve

                                  It's only for forwarding that I can see. Is that accurate?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S Offline
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by stephenw10

                                    Yes, you can only use with forwarding mode.

                                    As a test though it would be useful just eliminate all DNS UDP packets hitting the modem.

                                    Steve

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B Offline
                                      brians
                                      last edited by

                                      https://forum.netgate.com/topic/137938/shaw-300-issue-with-arris-xb6-modem-severe-intermittent-wan-slowdowns/9?_=1614764271055

                                      Sounds similar to issue I had couple years ago with Shaw cable.
                                      Not sure if it was modem or moca filter that resolved as both were done at same time.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.