Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Bind upgrade producing errors on pfsense 2.5 upgrade

    pfSense Packages
    16
    112
    29.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      horrza @matthijs
      last edited by

      @matthijs "Name Server" and "Base Domain IP" was the problem in my case.

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        matthijs @horrza
        last edited by matthijs

        @horrza

        I cannot understand that is causing the issue in my case these fields will result in the following records in de zone file (fictional IP and FQDN)

        @ IN NS nameserver.fqdn.com.
        @ IN A 1.1.1.1

        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          horrza @matthijs
          last edited by horrza

          @matthijs e6bfe4b6-eea6-475b-a8dc-3b0a2bba2e5c-image.png

          I did as shown in the video on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgn4oNy85_o&t=337s

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            wrgraves @matthijs
            last edited by

            @matthijs The video is a tutorial about configuring bind in pfsense and I just followed it while I looked at my config via the GUI. I wouldn't of even though some of the mistakes were mistakes. Like I put in the wrong base ip in the reverse zone and one of the reverse zones had localhost in the name of the nameserver and I changed it to 127.0.0.1. I cleared all the serial numbers so they were generated, probably no effect on that one. In my 2.16.172 reverse some I changed the first record from 1.2.16.172 to 1 PTR pfsense.localdomain. I increased the the Memory limit in the main config from 256M to 1024M, now that could of had an effect. Most of it was just little differences and all of the changes were made with the GUI.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • W
              wrgraves
              last edited by wrgraves

              Here's a diff of the bind part of my backed up config...
              </serial>
              <allowupdate>localhost,localnets,localdomain</allowup | <allowupdate>any</allowupdate>
              <allowquery>localhost,localnets,localdomain</allowque | <allowquery>none,any</allowquery>
              <allowtransfer>localhost,localnets,localdomain</allow | <allowtransfer>any</allowtransfer>
              <hostname>1.2.16.172.in-addr.arpa.</hostname> | <hostname>1</hostname>
              <resultconfig>JFRUTCAxRAo7CiRPUklHSU4gMi4xNi4xNzIuaW4 | <resultconfig>JFRUTCAxRAo7CiRPUklHSU4gMi4xNi4xNzIuaW4
              <serial>3</serial> | <serial>2614104211</serial>
              <allowupdate>localhost,localnets</allowupdate> | <allowupdate>any</allowupdate>
              <allowquery>localhost,localnets</allowquery> | <allowquery>any</allowquery>
              <allowtransfer>localhost,localnets</allowtransfer> | <allowtransfer>any</allowtransfer>
              <row> <
              <hostname>KB9UNZ.DDNS.WS</hostname> <
              <hosttype>A</hosttype> <
              <hostvalue></hostvalue> <
              <hostdst>127.0.0.1</hostdst> <
              </row> <
              <customzonerecords>R1cxLkFNUFIuREFWRVMuTkVUIElOIEEgMT | <customzonerecords></customzonerecords>
              <resultconfig>JFRUTCA0MzIwMAo7CiRPUklHSU4gbG9jYWxob3N | <resultconfig>JFRUTCA0MzIwMAo7CiRPUklHSU4gbG9jYWxob3N
              > <rpz></rpz>
              <serial>2</serial> | <serial>2614104300</serial>
              <allowupdate>localhost,localnets</allowupdate> | <allowupdate>any</allowupdate>
              <allowquery>localhost,localnets</allowquery> | <allowquery>any</allowquery>
              <allowtransfer>localhost,localnets</allowtransfer> | <allowtransfer>any</allowtransfer>
              <hostname>1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.</hostname> | <hostname>1</hostname>
              <resultconfig>JFRUTCAxRAo7CiRPUklHSU4gMC4wLjEyNy5pbi1 | <resultconfig>JFRUTCAxRAo7CiRPUklHSU4gMC4wLjEyNy5pbi1
              <wireguard> | <wireguard></wireguard>
              </wireguard> <
              root@ubt:~/Downloads#

              Well that didn't turn out like I hoped but I deleted a couple of things too.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                wrgraves
                last edited by wrgraves

                missed a line
                <bind_ram_limit>256M</bind_ra | <bind_ram_limit>1024M</bind_r
                Been marked as a spammer so I can't edit the previous entry. Note that you can turn off zones and that may help in debugging. Just go to the little box at the beginning of the zone and disable it and see if it stops crashing.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • freebsd-manF
                  freebsd-man
                  last edited by freebsd-man

                  Hi!

                  Could the usage of an additional ACL cause the problem?

                  Debian Discussion: Bug#980786: named: after upgrade to bind9=1:9.16.11-1 named is killed with status=11/SEGV

                  N M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • N
                    nordeep @freebsd-man
                    last edited by

                    @freebsd-man Thanks. It's make sense.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      madforic @freebsd-man
                      last edited by

                      @freebsd-man That is the issue!
                      In my case I disabled any named acl and bind started as expected.
                      Named acls make sense only for master zones. Slave and forward zones works with named acls without proplems.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        matthijs
                        last edited by

                        Is there maybe a way to workaround for this ACL issue ? I have two ACLs and I really need them (one is an ACL containing secondary name servers who are allowed to do zone transfers, the other is an ACL containing hosts who are allowed to do dynamic updates)

                        Or should I wait till this bug is fixed and a new release is provided ?

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          md0 @matthijs
                          last edited by

                          I'm not sure if I have the same issue, but after upgrading to 2.5.0, named service, along with several other downloaded packages, fail to start upon reboot. A manual start of the named service clears the blockage and all the other services then proceed to start normally.

                          No logs whatsoever are saved on the first (automatic) start attempt. Afterwards, no error is shown, I've tried to delete my only named ACL, but the problem persists. Reinstalling the Bind package is also of no use.

                          Any hints on how I could debug this further would be appreciated.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            matthijs
                            last edited by matthijs

                            I read that this Bind bug (bug 980786) where freebsd-man is referring to is already fixed.
                            Can Netgate update the Bind package to the latest version?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • viktor_gV
                              viktor_g Netgate
                              last edited by

                              try to update it directly (on x86):

                              # pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:12:amd64/latest/All/lmdb-0.9.28,1.txz
                              # pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:12:amd64/latest/All/bind916-9.16.12.txz
                              
                              freebsd-manF M N 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • freebsd-manF
                                freebsd-man @viktor_g
                                last edited by

                                @viktor_g :
                                With the BIND 9.16.12 package I can use an ACL without issues in a view and zones.

                                The LDAP package is a needed dependency for installing the bind package this way.
                                I think the final updated pfSense package will perhaps also have this dependency or will be a modified package without it.
                                So I will delete both packages before updating bind via pfSense GUI.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  md0 @viktor_g
                                  last edited by

                                  @viktor_g
                                  I've updated to the 9.16.12 version and my problem persists, so this is clearly not related. Maybe I should open a support ticket?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    matthijs
                                    last edited by

                                    I updated directly to bind916-9.16.12 from the command line like viktor_g suggested, and all my Bind problems are SOLVED :-) , bind starts and runs without issues now. Can Netgate update the official Package Manager with bind916-9.16.12 ?

                                    Thanks in advance

                                    Kr

                                    Matthijs

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • N
                                      nordeep @viktor_g
                                      last edited by

                                      @viktor_g
                                      Confirm. After manual update bind to 9.16.12 issue has been solved, in my case.
                                      Thank you!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • freebsd-manF
                                        freebsd-man
                                        last edited by

                                        After deleting the manual installed bind and lmdb packages und the old pfSense -pkg-bind package via shell, I installed the updated Package pfSense-pkg-bind-9.16_10 via GUI.

                                        While installing I used "tail -f /var/log/resolver.log" to inspect the startup of the new bind.

                                        I got rndc timeout messages from install log in GUI and errors from bind-startup in tail-output.
                                        After GUI timouts the install finished successful.

                                        After deleting corrupted journal files with "rm /cf/named/etc/namedb/*jnl" I finally was able to start bind via GUI.
                                        Now it is up and running.

                                        M D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          md0 @freebsd-man
                                          last edited by

                                          @freebsd-man
                                          In my case, upgrading the Bind package did not solve the problem. I get the same timeouts at install, but also during startup. I've deleted all the files and reinstalled the package, but it didn't make any difference.

                                          What I've found out is that given enough time (like 15-20 minutes in my case) the named service will eventually start, but not before cycling through each of the zones trying to freeze and thaw them and getting timeouts from RNDC. There are no logs of this, but I can see the processes in memory:

                                          /usr/local/sbin/rndc -q -c /usr/local/etc/rndc.conf freeze [zone name] IN [view name]
                                          /usr/local/sbin/rndc -q -c /usr/local/etc/rndc.conf thaw [zone name] IN [view name]
                                          

                                          It's definitely a problem with RNDC, but I can't figure out how to fix it, I guess I'll just have to go back to 2.4.5, since I'm apparently the only one experiencing this issue.

                                          freebsd-manF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • freebsd-manF
                                            freebsd-man @md0
                                            last edited by

                                            @md0
                                            But we can say, named is not crashing with signal 11 any more.
                                            Your problem seems to be a config problem.
                                            And yes, bind behaves more and more like a "diva".

                                            My tips:
                                            When saving something in GUI and running in timeout, it is possible to interrupt the page reload after 5 or more seconds and enter bind GUI again. So the GUI has generated the config.
                                            Setting bind logging more verbose will also help to find the errors via "tail -f /var/log/resolver.log" in ssh shell.
                                            If rndc shows timeouts, in most cases named does not answer.
                                            So the timeout is caused by config problem. For example IP-port is used by other daemon or zone-loading error or journal file corrupted.
                                            When inspecting zones I always clear the serial.
                                            Keep your configs simple and look out for error messages at named start.
                                            When looking for errors, it is better to stop and start the process. Using rndc is useless if named is not running!
                                            Keep in mind: Errors will stop "named" process and warnings will not. Most errors will be show inside "resolver" logfiles.

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.