x540 and x550 performance the same
-
1 out of 88 actually lol read out, doesnt seem busy
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU15 15 250:03 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu15}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU25 25 250:03 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu25}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU17 17 250:02 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu17}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU23 23 250:02 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu23}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU35 35 250:01 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu35}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU33 33 250:01 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu33}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU53 53 250:00 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu53}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU37 37 250:00 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu37}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU39 39 250:00 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu39}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU45 45 249:58 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu45}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU49 49 249:58 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu49}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU36 36 249:56 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu36}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU81 81 249:55 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu81}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU46 46 249:55 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu46}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU14 14 249:54 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu14}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU56 56 249:53 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu56}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU16 16 249:53 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu16}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU76 76 249:52 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu76}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU50 50 249:51 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu50}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU68 68 249:50 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu68}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU52 52 249:50 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu52}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU54 54 249:49 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu54}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU38 38 249:48 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu38}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU79 79 249:47 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu79}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU67 67 249:46 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu67}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU62 62 249:44 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu62}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU73 73 249:44 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu73}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU87 87 249:43 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu87}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU51 51 249:41 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu51}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU40 40 249:40 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu40}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU83 83 249:34 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu83}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU75 75 249:34 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu75}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU86 86 249:30 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu86}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU22 22 249:30 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu22}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU70 70 249:29 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu70}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU65 65 249:06 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu65}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU78 78 249:50 99.99% [idle{idle: cpu78}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU77 77 249:36 99.99% [idle{idle: cpu77}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU47 47 249:46 99.99% [idle{idle: cpu47}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU9 9 250:03 99.99% [idle{idle: cpu9}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU8 8 249:58 99.97% [idle{idle: cpu8}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K RUN 85 249:33 99.89% [idle{idle: cpu85}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU7 7 250:02 99.88% [idle{idle: cpu7}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU1 1 250:03 99.88% [idle{idle: cpu1}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU6 6 250:00 99.87% [idle{idle: cpu6}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU74 74 249:51 99.81% [idle{idle: cpu74}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU69 69 249:42 99.81% [idle{idle: cpu69}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU71 71 249:33 99.81% [idle{idle: cpu71}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU58 58 250:00 99.81% [idle{idle: cpu58}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU32 32 249:58 99.74% [idle{idle: cpu32}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU60 60 249:40 99.62% [idle{idle: cpu60}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU61 61 249:52 99.62% [idle{idle: cpu61}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU64 64 249:38 99.61% [idle{idle: cpu64}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU21 21 250:03 99.57% [idle{idle: cpu21}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU34 34 245:48 99.56% [idle{idle: cpu34}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU12 12 249:58 99.47% [idle{idle: cpu12}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU13 13 250:00 99.41% [idle{idle: cpu13}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU44 44 249:57 99.32% [idle{idle: cpu44}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU48 48 249:43 99.29% [idle{idle: cpu48}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU0 0 246:58 99.20% [idle{idle: cpu0}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU84 84 249:24 99.01% [idle{idle: cpu84}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU55 55 249:51 98.67% [idle{idle: cpu55}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU66 66 249:30 97.60% [idle{idle: cpu66}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU57 57 249:56 97.24% [idle{idle: cpu57}]
0 root -76 - 0B 7312K CPU20 20 0:18 96.78% [kernel{if_io_tqg_20}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU26 26 249:55 95.12% [idle{idle: cpu26}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU4 4 249:54 95.11% [idle{idle: cpu4}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU59 59 249:59 95.02% [idle{idle: cpu59}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU5 5 250:04 95.01% [idle{idle: cpu5}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU19 19 250:02 95.00% [idle{idle: cpu19}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU31 31 250:00 94.96% [idle{idle: cpu31}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU30 30 249:50 94.93% [idle{idle: cpu30}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU72 72 249:55 94.68% [idle{idle: cpu72}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU24 24 238:00 94.67% [idle{idle: cpu24}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU28 28 249:57 94.02% [idle{idle: cpu28}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU10 10 249:58 93.92% [idle{idle: cpu10}]
11 root 155 ki31 0B 1408K CPU63 63 249:42 93.65% [idle{idle: cpu63}] -
Ha, yup there you go. You need to test through it with multiple stream to have any idea what it's capable of.
-
@stephenw10 then why on windows can i run single stream and get 9+Gbit bidirectionally? Exactly same machine
-
In iperf3? With a firewall running?
pfSense is specifically not optimised as a TCP end point. It's setup to forward packets.
What you're seeing there is pretty much exactly what I expect if you're running iperf3 on pfSense. In fact it's better than I would expect.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 the crappy thing is, i should have just left it as a vm because really there's no advantages to vm vs hardware then because my speeds in a vm were no different
-
Certainly pfSense is never going to use anywhere near 88 CPU cores. So in that respect you would get far better use from the hardware running as a VM along side other VMs.
It still looks like you're testing it wrong though.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 oddly enough discovered the issue this am
Using upnp for device to negotiate to the outside world just works
manually nat/mapping seems to push some weird packet limit, maybe in the software, users couldnt get more than 20-25mbit streams going, now they're doing full.
-
Like in pfSense itself? Or on some upstream device?
Is this all inbound traffic then?
This is all new information.....
Steve
-
@stephenw10 So instead of nating a port internally, i use upnp and just let it do its thing, cleared up my issue, no idea why
-
To be clear you're talking about inbound traffic and some server opening ports via UPnP?
UPnP does nothing with outbound traffic.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 It solved one issue but now I need to find another but its not related to the nic