Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    30 Posts 4 Posters 3.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bingo600B
      bingo600 @dlogan
      last edited by

      @dlogan

      Just an idea ?

      Could it be WINS / Netbios name resolution ??
      Your devices can see/resolve when on same subnet , but not on separate lans ?

      /Bingo

      If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

      pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

      QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
      CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
      LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • D
        dlogan @bingo600
        last edited by

        @bingo600 said in VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my:

        n same subnet , but not on separate lans ?

        That would make sense, but why does my Windows 10 laptop, when put in that 10.10.11.x network vlan 111, why does it successfully make the connection?

        But let's say it is a Netbios name resoltion issue. Is there something I can do in pfSense to have this work without dual NICs on the VM?

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
          last edited by

          just use the fqdn to access your resource..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dlogan @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz
            Windows 95 computers aren't joined to our domain, there is no FQDN. I can assign them a name in DNS and use that, but it makes absolutely no difference.

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
              last edited by johnpoz

              Joining to a "domain" has nothing to do with a fqdn..

              Windows 95 machines understand dns just fine ;)

              L2 discovery doesn't work when your not on the same L2.. Be it broadcast, multicast, LLDP, WSD.. etc.. If you want to maintain old school OSes like that - then setup WINS ;) for them to resolve netbios names across vlans. Thats how it was done before ;) Getting rid of that crap that was was wins was the best thing ever! Gawd that was a mess to maintain across multiple sites..

              Or just use dns to resolve what you want via a fqdn. Or just use the IP ;)

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dlogan @johnpoz
                last edited by dlogan

                @johnpoz
                Ok, so I have a workgroup computer named XYZ. What is it's FQDN? It doesn't really have one. Again, I can put an A record on my DNS server and use the name instead of an IP, but it resolves NOTHING. What does the FQDN have to do with the inability to connect to an SMBv1 share from another subnet?

                "Or just use the IP"

                What do you think we're doing? How else would I be accessing it?

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @dlogan said in VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my:

                  What is it's FQDN?

                  Whatever you want to be!! Use the same thing your AD is using.

                  You resolving a name to an IP has zero to do with SMB be it 1, 2 or 3.. But no you can not use discovery across vlans.. your windows 95 box isn't going to be able to broadcast for server, and expect an answer because that doesn't cross L2..

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    dlogan @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz
                    So we've established that I can make an A record and use the name and it doesn't do anything, so I don't think FQDN has anything to do with this issue.

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      What issue? You say it works when you use IP.. So your problem is name resolution.. And again old L2 discovery methods do not work across vlans... Look up that up in the old MS docs - they had you run wins.. to resolve the host name to the ip.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dlogan @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz said in VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my:

                        me to an IP has zero to d

                        No I did not say it works by IP, I've been using IP since the beginning.

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                          last edited by

                          Well then open the ports on the firewall.. No old school OSes like windows 95 do not use the 445 port.. They used old school 137-139 ports for file sharing.. ie smb..

                          TCP 137 - SMB over TCP port (via NetBIOS).
                          UDP 137 - SMB over UDP port (via NetBIOS).
                          UDP 138 - SMB over UDP port (via NetBIOS).
                          TCP 139 - SMB over TCP port (via NetBIOS).

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dlogan @johnpoz
                            last edited by

                            @johnpoz
                            Nope. All open. Did you read the part where I put my laptop in vlan 111 and it works? But the 2019 server on my ESXi host doesn't? Then it suddenly works when I put a 2nd interface on the VM in vlan 110 but the SMB traffic isn't going out the 110 inteface, it's going out the 111 interface?

                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                              last edited by

                              This comes down to resolving name, and access.. Doesn't matter if smbv1,2 or 3..

                              Then a SYN on 139, which usually gets a SYN ACK.

                              If you get a syn ack.. You started the conversation and got an answer.

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                dlogan @johnpoz
                                last edited by

                                @johnpoz said in VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my:

                                You started the conversation and got an answer.

                                I agree. But the SMB session is never negotiated. On the 2019 VM there's a FIN ACK and nothing happens. On my 10 machine I see the SMB handshaking and the folder opens.

                                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                                  last edited by

                                  @dlogan said in VLANs and subnets and SMB1 oh my:

                                  FIN ACK and nothing happens

                                  That is closing the conversation.

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dlogan @johnpoz
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz
                                    Again, I agree. But why does the 2019 server close the connection and the Windows 10 machine continues on the the SMB protocol?

                                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                                      last edited by johnpoz

                                      You will have to ask windows why it closes the conversation.. Did you auth? I am on a work call currently - but I could fire up smb1 and show it working.. but if the server sends a FIN, it is closing the conversation..

                                      Can you post your sniff from your client, and then a sniff from the server at the same time will show you if any traffic is not passing the firewall.

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        dlogan @johnpoz
                                        last edited by dlogan

                                        It looks to me like the client side (the Server 2019 VM) is closing the connection. The FIN is sent from the client to the server.

                                        Where's a good place to upload the captures and link them here.

                                        The server side (Win 95 machine) is going to be difficult. I can't install anything on it. I might have to setup a mirror on my switch and get the packets from there.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          dlogan @johnpoz
                                          last edited by dlogan

                                          @johnpoz

                                          Ok, 1st capture, after a reboot, only 1 nic is enabled on the Server 2019 VM. I start a capture to host 10.10.10.12 and attempt opening the folder using \\10.10.10.12\002\ it fails: trackhound-to-002-nic1-vlan111-during-fail.pcapng

                                          2nd capture on the same interface, after enabling a 2nd NIC with IP 10.10.10.2 in the same VLAN as the 10.10.10.12 machine. This time the connection to \\10.10.10.12\002\ is successful: trackhound-to-002-nic1-vlan111-during-success-after-enabling-nic2.pcapng

                                          Another capture going on at the same time as the success but capturing all traffic on the 2nd NIC: trackhound-nic2-vlan110-during-success.pcapng

                                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dlogan
                                            last edited by johnpoz

                                            Your seeing error called name not present..

                                            Yeah that is going to be problem..

                                            https://osqa-ask.wireshark.org/questions/53776/what-does-called-name-not-present-mean

                                            In the 2nd one your never doing a session request.. I just see NBNS in there - your trying to just get a browse list?

                                            Your problem is the server doesn't know who you are, and says that - so the client says thanks and sends FIN.. Its just sending a generic name SMBSERV as its name..

                                            edit: I haven't played with the limitation of windows 95 in years and years.. Its time for a martini - work call ran way longer than the 30 mins scheduled.. Customer going down the qos rabbit hole ;) If I find some time I might fire up a 95/8 vm.. But a google for that specific error will give you the details of the problem.

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.