Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    HA strange behaviour, problems on passive box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    15 Posts 2 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      viragomann @ViniciusBr
      last edited by

      @viniciusbr
      Don't disable CARP on PF1, just activate the "persistent maintenance mode".

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        ViniciusBr @viragomann
        last edited by ViniciusBr

        @viragomann

        The way you suggested:

        PF1 went to backup status as expected and PF2 as master as expected.

        NOTES:

        • PF1 as master I sill cannot ping PF1 IP from DMZ;
        • PF2 as master DMZ is gone, can only ping PF1 IP, VIP and PF2 IP does not work;

        PF1 logs:
        771d47f4-f2fd-44c4-af11-14c88e8b663e-image.png

        PF2 logs:
        6dd59395-00a6-4216-8ca3-030a957e7c71-image.png

        V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          viragomann @ViniciusBr
          last edited by

          @viniciusbr
          Just to be sure, is the promiscuous mode enabled on ESXi?

          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            ViniciusBr @viragomann
            last edited by

            @viragomann

            Yes:

            PF1:
            517d4e12-f474-4b17-81ea-09cb7ae616e2-image.png

            PF2:
            938a8ee7-39bc-4b57-bc43-9599cc14df68-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              viragomann @ViniciusBr
              last edited by

              @viniciusbr
              Check out the ARP entry in the PF2 log where you've hidden the IP.
              It shows the IP moving from a CARP MAC to an physical MAC, when PF2 takes over. That seems strange to me.
              Possibly the virtual IP has the wrong type or something else is miss-configured on that interface.

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                ViniciusBr @viragomann
                last edited by

                @viragomann said in HA strange behaviour, problems on passive box:

                y the virtual IP has the wrong type or something else is miss-configured on that interfa

                I am investigating this, but that one is a public IP, which as far as I understand I am not having issues with.

                DMZ is still the problem.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  ViniciusBr
                  last edited by

                  Here are the virtual IPs:

                  PF1:
                  b3815f0c-3f1c-499e-9d01-468618d6eb49-image.png

                  PF2:
                  04a142fd-45c0-4b51-8e93-17d14805ecc4-image.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    ViniciusBr
                    last edited by

                    Now the basic questions:

                    • why from LAN I can ping both PF1 and VIP but NOT PF2? (DMZ IPs)
                      9003c799-9ad2-4ddf-8c65-22c3f039d6a4-image.png

                    Looking at the firewall, it is allowed:
                    0caad4a2-6325-4eeb-85cc-4c6a420df275-image.png

                    • same issue from DMZ:
                      5f88f1e9-8364-44a7-b378-6ffeeda9cbaf-image.png

                    28ab73c7-589d-4884-aa6a-7c5a2d6e8358-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      ViniciusBr
                      last edited by

                      I was able to find the root cause of the issue:

                      Nothing to do with pfsense: vmware vs switch port access/trunk modes misconfiguration.

                      Thanks for the help!

                      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        viragomann @ViniciusBr
                        last edited by

                        @viniciusbr
                        Thanks for coming back with clarification.

                        V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • V
                          ViniciusBr @viragomann
                          last edited by

                          @viragomann Thanks for your help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.