pfTop hangs my GUI in 2.5.2 RC

jimp

Hmm, it definitely shouldn't be taking that long to print out only 2400 states.

Trey

Block bogon networks was now on before reboot and is still...

pfctl shows up in top every now and then and uses a lot of cpu...

jimp

It's not likely related to bogons or aliases/tables at this point, but something in the state table.

I've started https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/12045 for this, and one of the other devs has a lead on a possible solution.

We're still trying to find a way to replicate it locally yet, but no luck.

jimp

OK I can't quite get up to the number of states you had with a quick and dirty test but I was able to get up to about 900 states and I definitely saw a slowdown.

20-50 states: 0.01s
300-450 states: 3s
850 states: 20s

I could easily see it degrading fast, need more data points but that certainly appears to be significant growth. The FreeBSD commit I linked in the Redmine above mentions factorial time (O(N!)) which would be quite bad in terms of efficiency.

We're working on getting a fix into a new build, it should be available soon.

Trey

Sounds greate. I did a ktrace und kdump on pfctl -ss

62033 pfctl    0.126404 CALL  mmap(0,0xa01000,0x3<PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE>,0x1002<MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON>,0xffffffff,0)
 62033 pfctl    0.126446 RET   mmap 34374418432/0x800e00000
 62033 pfctl    0.126700 CALL  ioctl(0x3,DIOCGETSTATESNV,0x7fffffffe410)
 62033 pfctl    71.020411 RET   ioctl 0
 62033 pfctl    71.020973 CALL  mmap(0,0x5000,0x3<PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE>,0x1002<MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON>,0xffffffff,0)
 62033 pfctl    71.020984 RET   mmap 34368081920/0x8007f5000

It keeps 71 sec? (not so sure about how kdump time output) in ioctl(0x3,DIOCGETSTATESNV,0x7fffffffe410).... Does this confirm the nvlist bottleneck or is ioctl something else ?

Trey

Okay, that is easy to answer:

Add DIOCGETSTATESNV, an nvlist-based alternative to DIOCGETSTATES.

Also from netgate: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30243

So this should be it...

Trey

Okay just as scrolling through the kdump output of pfctl -ss .... has netgate some developer for the pfctl binary? Because from my small understanding it always reads two files from the filesystem for each state... 2400 states x reading 2 files...

For me it looks a little insane to not cache the "/etc/nsswitch.conf" and "/etc/protocols", as it should waste a lot of time... Perhaps not, because the os is caching it, but still seems like a good idea to cache all that stuff....

This is really executed for each state:


 62033 pfctl    71.128083 CALL  fstatat(AT_FDCWD,0x80032b331,0x7fffffffe240,0)
 62033 pfctl    71.128086 NAMI  "/etc/nsswitch.conf"
 62033 pfctl    71.128091 STRU  struct stat {dev=159, ino=26564847, mode=0100644, nlink=1, uid=0, gid=0, rdev=53065152, atime=1623785215.468672000, mtime=1623781736.833527000, ctime=1623781736.833527000, birthtime=1623619006, size=188, blksize=32768, blocks=8, flags=0x0 }
 62033 pfctl    71.128093 RET   fstatat 0
 62033 pfctl    71.128096 CALL  open(0x80032e6b6,0x100000<O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC>)
 62033 pfctl    71.128099 NAMI  "/etc/protocols"
 62033 pfctl    71.128103 RET   open 4
 62033 pfctl    71.128106 CALL  fstat(0x4,0x7fffffffdea0)
 62033 pfctl    71.128108 STRU  struct stat {dev=159, ino=26564791, mode=0100644, nlink=1, uid=0, gid=0, rdev=53064232, atime=1623785215.488007000, mtime=1623619006, ctime=1623752821.339423000, birthtime=1623619006, size=6394, blksize=32768, blocks=16, flags=0x0 }
 62033 pfctl    71.128110 RET   fstat 0
 62033 pfctl    71.128112 CALL  read(0x4,0x80226bf80,0x8000)
 62033 pfctl    71.128117 GIO   fd 4 read 4096 bytes
       "#
	# Internet protocols
	#
	# $FreeBSD$
	#	from: @(#)protocols	5.1 (Berkeley) 4/17/89
	#
	# See also http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers
	#
	ip	0	IP		# internet protocol, pseudo protocol number
	#hopopt	0	HOPOPT		# hop-by-hop options for ipv6
	icmp	1	ICMP		# internet control message protocol
	igmp	2	IGMP		# internet group management protocol
	ggp	3	GGP		# gateway-gateway protocol
	ipencap	4	IP-ENCAP	# IP encapsulated in IP (officially ``IP'')
	st2	5	ST2		# ST2 datagram mode (RFC 1819) (officially ``ST'')
	tcp	6	TCP		# transmission control protocol
	cbt	7	CBT		# CBT, Tony Ballardie <A.Ballardie@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
	egp	8	EGP		# exterior gateway protocol
	igp	9	IGP		# any private interior gateway (Cisco: for IGRP)
	bbn-rcc	10	BBN-RCC-MON	# BBN RCC Monitoring
	nvp	11	NVP-II		# Network Voice Protocol
	pup	12	PUP		# PARC universal packet protocol
	argus	13	ARGUS		# ARGUS
	emcon	14	EMCON		# EMCON
	xnet	15	XNET		# Cross Net Debugger
	chaos	16	CHAOS		# Chaos
	udp	17	UDP		# user datagram protocol
	mux	18	MUX		# Multiplexing protocol
	dcn	19	DCN-MEAS	# DCN Measurement Subsystems
	hmp	20	HMP		# host monitoring protocol
	prm	21	PRM		# packet radio measurement protocol
	xns-idp	22	XNS-IDP		# Xerox NS IDP
	trunk-1	23	TRUNK-1		# Trunk-1
	trunk-2	24	TRUNK-2		# Trunk-2
	leaf-1	25	LEAF-1		# Leaf-1
	leaf-2	26	LEAF-2		# Leaf-2
	rdp	27	RDP		# "reliable datagram" protocol
	irtp	28	IRTP		# Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol
	iso-tp4	29	ISO-TP4		# ISO Transport Protocol Class 4
	netblt	30	NETBLT		# Bulk Data Transfer Protocol
	mfe-nsp	31	MFE-NSP		# MFE Network Services Protocol
	merit-inp	32	MERIT-INP	# MERIT Internodal Protocol
	dccp	33	DCCP		# Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
	3pc	34	3PC		# Third Party Connect Protocol
	idpr	35	IDPR		# Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol
	xtp	36	XTP		# Xpress Transfer Protocol
	ddp	37	DDP		# Datagram Delivery Protocol
	idpr-cmtp	38	IDPR-CMTP	# IDPR Control Message Transport Proto
	tp++	39	TP++		# TP++ Transport Protocol
	il	40	IL		# IL Transport Protocol
	ipv6	41	IPV6		# ipv6
	sdrp	42	SDRP		# Source Demand Routing Protocol
	ipv6-route	43	IPV6-ROUTE	# routing header for ipv6
	ipv6-frag	44	IPV6-FRAG	# fragment header for ipv6
	idrp	45	IDRP		# Inter-Domain Routing Protocol
	rsvp	46	RSVP		# Resource ReSerVation Protocol
	gre	47	GRE		# Generic Routing Encapsulation
	dsr	48	DSR		# Dynamic Source Routing Protocol
	bna	49	BNA		# BNA
	esp	50	ESP		# encapsulating security payload
	ah	51	AH		# authentication header
	i-nlsp	52	I-NLSP		# Integrated Net Layer Security TUBA
	swipe	53	SWIPE		# IP with Encryption
	narp	54	NARP		# NBMA Address Resolution Protocol
	mobile	55	MOBILE		# IP Mobility
	tlsp	56	TLSP		# Transport Layer Security Protocol
	skip	57	SKIP		# SKIP
	ipv6-icmp	58	IPV6-ICMP	icmp6	# ICMP for IPv6
	ipv6-nonxt	59	IPV6-NONXT	# no next header for ipv6
	ipv6-opts	60	IPV6-OPTS	# destination options for ipv6
	#	61			# any host internal protocol
	cftp	62	CFTP		# CFTP
	#	63			# any local network
	sat-expak	64	SAT-EXPAK	# SATNET and Backroom EXPAK
	kryptolan	65	KRYPTOLAN	# Kryptolan
	rvd	66	RVD		# MIT Remote Virtual Disk Protocol
	ippc	67	IPPC		# Internet Pluribus Packet Core
	#	68			# any distributed filesystem
	sat-mon	69	SAT-MON		# SATNET Monitoring
	visa	70	VISA		# VISA Protocol
	ipcv	71	IPCV		# Internet Packet Core Utility
	cpnx	72	CPNX		# Computer Protocol Network Executive
	cphb	73	CPHB		# Computer Protocol Heart Beat
	wsn	74	WSN		# Wang Span Network
	pvp	75	PVP		# Packet Video Protocol
	br-sat-mon	76	BR-SAT-MON	# Backroom SATNET Monitoring
	sun-nd	77	SUN-ND		# SUN ND PROTOCOL-Temporary
	wb-mon	78	WB-MON		# WIDEBAND Monitoring
	wb-expak	79	WB-EXPAK	# WIDEBAND EXPAK
	iso-ip	80	ISO-IP		# ISO Internet Protocol
	vmtp	81	VMTP		# Versatile Message Transport
	secure-vmtp	82	SECURE-VMTP	# SECURE-VMTP
	vines	83	VINES		# VINES
	ttp	84	TTP		# TTP
	#iptm	84	IPTM		# Protocol Internet Protocol Traffic
	nsfnet-igp	85	NSFNET-IGP	# NSFNET-IGP
	dgp	86	DGP		# Dissimilar Gateway Protocol
	tcf	87	TCF		# TCF
	eigrp	88	EIGRP		# Enhanced Interior Routing Protocol (Cisco)
	ospf	89	OSPFIGP		# Open Shortest Path First IGP
	sprite-rpc	90	Sprite-RPC	# Sprite RPC Protocol
	larp	91	LARP		# Locus Address Resolution Protocol
	mtp	"
 62033 pfctl    71.128119 RET   read 6394/0x18fa
 62033 pfctl    71.128125 CALL  close(0x4)
 62033 pfctl    71.128129 RET   close 0
 62033 pfctl    71.128137 CALL  write(0x1,0x802252000,0x4c)
 62033 pfctl    71.128142 GIO   fd 1 wrote 76 bytes
       "all tcp 192.168.0.68:80 <- 192.168.11.7:50425       ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED
       "

mfld

I was about to open a thread here on the same before daring to touch redmine.

I noticed this thread on reddit.

Lo and behold I upgraded a 2.4.5-p1 to 2.5.2-RC and now the CPU is locked with high load from pfctl -ss.

System is virtual instance in KVM, single core, 1GB RAM. Less than half the RAM is used. No fancy packages. Normal workload service DNS recursion over tcp/853 and 53/udp averages 30-40k states out of 100k so it is not yet scaling.

In my case the states are mostly UDP connection from DNS clients. System used to handle 30-40k states like this without breaking a sweat and CPU utilization showing less than 10%. Now it handles around 1k states OK, once there are around 5k states it falls over.

screenshot at just under 5000 states

Cloned instance, upgraded to a 2.6.0 snapshot and see the same there.

I will try update to today's 2.5.2-RC build and see if it helps

Current Base System
2.5.2.r.20210613.1712
Latest Base System
2.5.2.r.20210615.1851

Edit2: Initially I came up with high load after updating to 2.5.2.r.20210615.1851 but this is because I had ~20k new connections coming in all at once after the reboot and this is a 5 dollar VPS so... Happy to report that having been live on 2.5.2.r.20210615.1851 for about 20 minutes now I am back to tens of thousands of states with "normal for my spec" load.

maverick_slo

I just updated to latest build and issue is gone :)
Thanks!

mfld

And now I pray that https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11545 will also make it into 2.5.2

Big improvements from 2.5.0 to 2.5.2. I'd hazard a guess the crew did not 9-5 these past few weeks. #insomnia

jimp

Looks good for me here too on the latest build. I can't replicate any slowness on the latest build. I only had it up to about 1k states, but that was enough to see a significant impact previously.

Trey

@jimp

After updating 4 day ago, no more problems, thanks

jimp

There is a new snapshot up now (2.5.2.r.20210629.1350) which should be much better here. Update and give it a try.

Trey

@jimp

I just updated. Anything outstanding to test or try? What specifically changed in this version regarding the pfctl problem?

jimp

We rolled back all the recent pf changes so it's closer to what's in 21.05/2.5.1 (but with multi-WAN fixed). The new code needs some optimization work yet and we didn't want to hold up 2.5.2 any longer.

Trey

@jimp Greate news! After 10 minutes test drive no problems. Hope 2.5.2 is relased very sooooon. :-) The Multi Wan problem somehow, sometimes drives my IPSec VPN nuts. Like 10 pakets go through, then 10 pakets get droped....