Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Odroid C2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    45 Posts 4 Posters 7.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Yes because, like it says there, mode 17 is for 9600 baud and your GPS is running at 115200. So currently it's seeing no data.

      J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • J
        jcpingu @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10
        Thank you. I will advise latest status...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jcpingu @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10
          The good News:
          b022b744-34df-44b1-b57b-6840e82c4dca-image.png

          The not so good news, I am still seeing clock unsynchronized:
          6f2be03c-eca7-445a-811f-dfa31af4a896-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jcpingu @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10
            I was looking @ your example, and I see that it also shows this error:
            Jun 21 18:35:03 ntpd 56634 kernel reports TIME_ERROR: 0x41: Clock Unsynchronized

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Yes, I expect it to show that when ntpd is first started. It won't sync until sometime later when ntp is confident the time data it has is correct.
              Wait some time and recheck. Or it may have already sync'd there since it show an offset or effectively 0 (2μs) from the GPS time.

              Steve

              J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • J
                jcpingu @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10
                Thank you for all your help. I truly appreciate your patience and kindness. I still see the error this morning. However ntpq -p is showing the right output. I am assuming there's nothing I can do about the error...
                f64cc788-75d7-4e80-b6de-1709d5f94363-image.png

                bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bingo600B
                  bingo600 @jcpingu
                  last edited by

                  @jcpingu

                  Have a look here
                  https://serverfault.com/questions/1048870/ntpd-fails-to-sync-time-error-0x41-clock-unsynchronized

                  Especially this command : ntpq -c sysinfo

                  Normally as @stephenw10 mentioned , ntpd won't just accept a new clocksource , before investigating if it's "ok".

                  I usually expect approx 5 minutes (after daemon start) for the daemon to "trust/select" a clocksource.

                  If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                  pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                  QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                  CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                  LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • J
                    jcpingu @bingo600
                    last edited by

                    @bingo600
                    Here's the output of that command. I will check out the link. Thanks...
                    ff838b1f-9a99-4f6b-a70c-f2fe599803ff-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jcpingu @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      This is my ntp.conf file. Based on bingo600 comments above. Is there anything else that needs to happen here?

                      server 127.127.20.0 mode 81 minpoll 4 maxpoll 4 prefer
                      fudge 127.127.20.0 flag1 1 refid GPS

                      security

                      restrict default kod limited nomodify nopeer
                      restrict -6 default kod limited nomodify nopeer

                      Local users may interrogate the NTP server fully.

                      restrict 127.0.0.1
                      restrict -6 ::1

                      stats

                      driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift

                      Enable statistics logging.

                      statsdir /var/log/ntpstats/
                      statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
                      filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
                      filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
                      filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

                      leap file

                      leapfile /var/lib/ntp/leap-seconds.list

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        No, I think it's working as expected.
                        That error will always appear when you restart ntpd for any reason. I would only vbe concerned if it is still logging new errors after running for some time.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • bingo600B
                          bingo600 @jcpingu
                          last edited by bingo600

                          @jcpingu

                          Try to put in a few ntp pool servers for reference.

                          Add this to your ntp.conf

                          # Internet time servers for sanity
                          server 0.pool.ntp.org iburst prefer 
                          server 1.pool.ntp.org iburst 
                          server 2.pool.ntp.org iburst 
                          server 3.pool.ntp.org iburst
                          

                          From here:
                          http://doc.ntp.org/4.2.6/drivers/driver20.html

                          It seems like the $GNRMC is not a supported sentence , and that either
                          $GPZDA or $GPZDG must be sent for the NTP system to be fully autonomous. As in being able to set date/time fully via NTP.

                          What GPS model do you have ?
                          Is it from "China" ... Where most Ublox'es are "fakes"

                          This is not an "all bad" mesage , as the PPS still will keep your clock extremely accurate (sub seconds) . You just need a bit of help setting the seconds.

                          But it's strange that the nmea driver is so picky.
                          Maybe gpsd would help here

                          /Bingo

                          If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                          pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                          QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                          CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                          LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                          bingo600B J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bingo600B
                            bingo600 @bingo600
                            last edited by bingo600

                            @bingo600

                            The NTP nmea refdriver doc is "buggy"

                            I just had a quick glance at the source
                            https://github.com/ntp-project/ntp/blob/master-no-authorname/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c

                            08de05e8-b0c3-4db4-9d95-939ec3e666a3-image.png

                            And it's comparing the last 3 (4) characters in the sentence so any RMC works

                            And it seems like it's parsing/setting the date from RMC sentenses too.
                            The only thing ZDA is providing "extra" is YYYY vs YY from RMC.

                            c398f0a9-851a-409d-903c-f38f9d323831-image.png

                            It should be possible to make a working NTP system with just RMC sentences , if NTP has been updated to assume that YY (21) means 2021.
                            Which i expect the unfold_century function does.

                            /Bingo

                            If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                            pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                            QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                            CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                            LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jcpingu @bingo600
                              last edited by

                              @bingo600 said in Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Odroid C2:

                              ntp pool servers

                              Does it matter where the ntp pool servers are inserted in the ntp.conf file?

                              bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bingo600B
                                bingo600 @jcpingu
                                last edited by bingo600

                                @jcpingu

                                This guy puts it after the drift file

                                # Drift file to remember clock rate across restarts
                                driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift
                                # Servers
                                pool uk.pool.ntp.org iburst
                                

                                And have a look here
                                https://lintut.com/how-to-verify-ntp-setup-is-working-properly-in-linux-or-unix-server/

                                Verifying a stratum1 server might not be "super easy"

                                Use
                                ntpstat

                                My box says (No GPS installed) :

                                ntpstat
                                synchronised to NTP server (80.71.132.xxx) at stratum 2 
                                   time correct to within 48 ms
                                   polling server every 1024 s
                                
                                

                                And
                                ntpq -p

                                ntpq -p
                                     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
                                ==============================================================================
                                -n1.taur.xx      .PPS0.           1 u  753 1024  377    7.164   -0.397   0.383
                                *80.71.132.10x.i .GPS.            1 u  985 1024  377    1.862   -0.114   0.111
                                +mmo2.ntp.xx  .PPS.            1 u  141 1024  377    2.827   -0.571   0.479
                                 5.103.139.163.s .GPS.            1 u   8d 1024    0    3.267    0.348   0.000
                                -82.180.61.122   193.204.114.233  2 u  735 1024  377   40.205    0.981   0.419
                                +grape.inet.xx.n 68.166.61.255    2 u  315 1024  377    1.207   -0.107   0.089
                                
                                

                                The peer with the * in front (here 80.71.132.10x.i ) is the one that is used (synced to) right now.

                                o = pps peer
                                * = sys peer
                                # = too distant
                                + = selected
                                x = false ticker
                                - = discarded
                                
                                

                                Show the output of your ntpq -p

                                If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                                pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                                QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                                CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                                LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                                J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  jcpingu @bingo600
                                  last edited by

                                  @bingo600
                                  here's ntpq -p output
                                  5e7ce23a-d697-4082-8c35-3fddfeaf0d2b-image.png

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jcpingu @bingo600
                                    last edited by

                                    @bingo600
                                    Here's systemctl status ntp output, still showing clock unsync error:
                                    d7d84c61-17bb-4d92-8b92-7e1cd34d61be-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by stephenw10

                                      That error is when you started the ntp daemon. It has no data at that point, it will never sync. It's expected.

                                      That output from ntpq looks good. You just need to wait for more peers with greater reach values.

                                      Steve

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • J
                                        jcpingu @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10
                                        My question now is do I really need these? or was my original ntp.conf was just fine without these...

                                        Internet time servers for sanity

                                        server 0.pool.ntp.org iburst prefer
                                        server 1.pool.ntp.org iburst
                                        server 2.pool.ntp.org iburst
                                        server 3.pool.ntp.org iburst

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          I would keep some external servers defined. More sources in agreement is going to make ntp happier, faster 😉

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • J
                                            jcpingu @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            @stephenw10
                                            Thank you

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.