Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    5.79Gbps across LAN

    General pfSense Questions
    4
    6
    638
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      TerrenceTtibbs
      last edited by TerrenceTtibbs

      When connecting a Truenas server to my Pfsense box with SFP+ through my 10gig switch on the same LAN running iperf I am getting around 5.79Gbps.

      Can anyone tell me if this is normal? I expected to see 10Gbps if on the same LAN or is this a PFsense limitation with the software. Both machines are Xeon multi cores with 32GB plus of RAM.

      Truenas——————10gig switch———————Pfsense

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JKnottJ
        JKnott
        last edited by

        That's impossible to say without knowing what performance the computers are good for. Try connecting them directly.

        PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
        i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
        UniFi AC-Lite access point

        I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JKnott
          last edited by johnpoz

          Never test it that way anyway. Pfsense is meant to be router, and route traffic - not process traffic..

          test through pfsense..

          truenas -- 10g -- pfsense -- 10g -- other box..

          once you have validated what

          truenas -- 10g -- other box

          Can do..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yes, iperf can be useful on the firewall to prove a link speed but not for absolute values testing.
            It shows your are connected at >1Gbps here for example but that value will always be lower then testing between two hosts through the firewall.

            Steve

            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              TerrenceTtibbs
              last edited by

              Weh I couldn't face booting up my spare workstation and installing 10gig card and having to have 2 keyboards etc etc. I guess its the only way to check all my hardware is working as it should, so I will link 2 workstations together later and blast them with iperf and hopefully get near 10gig.

              Thanks peoples

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                TerrenceTtibbs @stephenw10
                last edited by TerrenceTtibbs

                @stephenw10

                Just booted Trunenas on a Dell R220 Xeon 1220-V3 16GB ram and linked directly to Dell workstation with OM3, running windows and Xeon 1230V5 16GB ram.

                546+ SFP+ mellanox cards

                Results

                [ 1] local 192.168.2.1 port 57829 connected with 192.168.2.2 port 5001
                [ 2] local 192.168.2.1 port 57830 connected with 192.168.2.2 port 5001
                [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
                [ 2] 0.00-10.03 sec 5.57 GBytes 4.77 Gbits/sec
                [ 1] 0.00-10.03 sec 5.44 GBytes 4.66 Gbits/sec
                [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 11.0 GBytes 9.45 Gbits/sec

                Happy with that.

                This is interesting -

                I now did the same iperf transfer but this time removing the OM3 fibre and using DAC 2M copper and here are the results -

                [ 2] local 192.168.2.1 port 62289 connected with 192.168.2.2 port 5001
                [ 1] local 192.168.2.1 port 62288 connected with 192.168.2.2 port 5001
                [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
                [ 2] 0.00-10.01 sec 6.33 GBytes 5.43 Gbits/sec
                [ 1] 0.00-10.03 sec 4.61 GBytes 3.95 Gbits/sec
                [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.39 Gbits/sec

                I ran both tests a few times and DAC is consistently slower transfer rate.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.