WireGuard site-to-site pfsense-to-pfsense no handshake?
-
-
Now it works? (the handshake)
But why? -
I now have this setup
Tunnel - Site 1
Tunnel: tun_wg0 (Site 1)
Public key: PK1Peer - Site 1
Tunnel: tun_wg0 (Site 1)
Endpoint: Dynamic
Public Key: PK2Interface - Site 1
Description: WG
IPv4: Static IPv4
MTU: 1420
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.2/24Gateway- Site 1
Interface: WG
Name: WG_Gateway
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.1Tunnel - Site 2
Tunnel: tun_wg0 (Site 2)
Public key: PK2Peer - Site 2
Tunnel: tun_wg0 (Site 2)
Endpoint: <Public IP of Site 1>
Public Key: PK1Interface - Site 2
Description: WG
IPv4: Static IPv4
MTU: 1420
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.3/24Gateway- Site 2
Interface: WG
Name: WG_Gateway
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.1I now have a handshake with the above, but the gateways is offline, I do allow "any" traffic on the WG interface
-
of course the gateway is offline this ins’t real wan traffic ! it’s only wireguard traffic
just unchek monitor the gatheway
now here the thicky part
for subnet A to reach subnet B and virce versa you need to add a static routing
ex : on router A
you put subnet b and assing to gateway done before for wireguard and vice versahere i thing that painful right now ! if you restart wireguard service, static routing dissapear fron the route
you need to go back to stating routing and apply back
-
Why do the WireGuard not start a connection if the gateway is either not set or set to not to monitor, that is so odd. But I do understand the painful part.
but why do they not work more similar to a tunnel interface, where insted of setting a gateway that do not exist, why don't we use the opposite IP, site 1 used the IP from site 2 as gateway and so on, or just use an different monitor IP to keep it alive, so we also have ping stats do that work?
also ping (to and from site 1 and 2) do not seem to work after done the above.
-
if you go on github wireguard fron theonemcdonald issue #43 they are working on it. experimental don’t forget ! for the ping make sure your route are corresponding to your static routing ! cannot help anymore !
i have try also to set the gateway as the same ip
of the tunnel but the speed was 1/2 but it worked !so thing are broken on site to site
use openvpn for now ! work like a charm
i use openvpn site to multi site for 3 years never had an issue
-
Im want to kill my openVPN (Layer2 TAP) tunnels as they do not at all work like a charm for me at all, I have a lot of tunnels and some is just working and some are sometimes broken.
(Yes I know WG is Layer 3 tunnel)
-
@mikki-10
openvpn never gave me problem ! maybe you have someting misconfigure !but listen bro ! theonemcdonald is working hard to fix thing.
wireguard will live and rise but not yet :)
i do know that wireguard in pfsense 2.5.0
was working great for site to site but they kill it for reason ! so we will wait fow nowmaybe you should stop your openvpn instance for your testing purpose ! maybe you should do a backup and remove all openvpn ! i remember having issue when openvpn was there with wireguard site to site
-
Hi I know, I have followed he's youtube videos and github pagem, and wanted to jump head first when pfsense 2.5.2 was out, as the 2.5.0 WG just worked so well for me, and therefore hoped for the best, but I did not know how broken site-to-site was at this point, but I have not lost hope, and can't wait for the new WG to get better and more stable.
But thanks for your help so fare, I will see if I can get it working somehow.
-
@mikki-10
like i said do backup remove all vpn and start from scratch only wireguard!never know
anyway if problem just restore
have a good one
-
Hi I am on OPT18 as the next interface, not gonna happen over night, plus all the firewall rules, that is a big one
-
@mikki-10
i tested on 2 pfsense today with no ovpn
no problemive did the same procedure on pfsense main office with lot’s of ovpn nothing was going as expected so ! look like openvpn is messing some shit arround
-
There was a closed github issue like that but just with IPsec, same thing.
-
question your openvpn problematic
is it on the clients side ? if so just add
nobind in the *.ovpnnobind
that it
here’s the symptoms client connect but traffic is not goiing thru .
-
It is also site-to-site pfsense-to-pfsense, not sure if that will do anything for that.
And other clients eg windows or linux, work just fine, but again that is an other tunnel in this case, but thanks for the tip
-
@mikki-10
hahahaha
i did some more digging !
this is hilarious !
now my wireguard SITEA GATEWAY is the ip of SITEB
and my SITEB GATEWAY is the ip of SITEA !
when the handshake occur all gateway are online !! and ping goes on !absolutely ASOME OR RIDICULOUS
I PUT THE CONFIG BASE ON YOUR IPInterface - Site 1
Description: WG
IPv4: Static IPv4
MTU: 1420
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.1/24Gateway- Site 1
Interface: WG
Name: WG_Gateway
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.2/24Interface - Site 2
Description: WG
IPv4: Static IPv4
MTU: 1420
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.2/24Gateway- Site 2
Interface: WG
Name: WG_Gateway
IPv4 Address: 192.168.77.1/24 -
@mikki-10
My SITEA
-
-
Super nice, seems like we were able to help eachother out a bit then
I redid some of the steps, I now have one tunnel all working now!
-
Hello,
I also have the same problem, site to site impossible with Wireguard on pfsense in version 2.5.2.
You mentioned OpenVPN, Wireguard and IPSEC in the conversation, is your last messages for solving the problem about Wireguard?
