Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfBlocker not logging after 2.5.2 pfSense upgrade

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    53 Posts 17 Posters 11.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      maddy_in65 @Gertjan
      last edited by

      @gertjan
      Here is "Top" output:

       processes:  4 running, 56 sleeping
      CPU: 91.3% user,  0.0% nice,  8.7% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
      Mem: 958M Active, 337M Inact, 750M Wired, 208K Buf, 1698M Free
      ARC: 278M Total, 161M MFU, 105M MRU, 2654K Anon, 2044K Header, 8178K Other
           160M Compressed, 585M Uncompressed, 3.66:1 Ratio
      Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
      
        PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    C   TIME    WCPU COMMAND
      62378 root         88  20    0   468M   423M nanslp   0   0:37 132.04% ntopng
      38952 unbound       1  77    0    91M    79M RUN      1   0:03  32.27% unbound
        347 root          1  52    0   102M    39M piperd   0   1:06  25.19% php-fpm
      43559 root          1  20    0    13M  3508K CPU1     1   0:00   0.59% top
      62111 root          4  20    0    22M  5356K kqread   1   0:00   0.29% redis-server
       9748 root          1  20    0    19M  6824K select   1   0:03   0.12% ntpd
      36481 root          1  20    0    20M  9220K select   0   0:00   0.10% sshd
      85972 root          5  52    0    11M  2592K uwait    0   0:00   0.06% dpinger
      47972 dhcpd         1  25    0    23M    12M select   1   0:00   0.02% dhcpd
      47822 root          1  20    0    18M  7552K kqread   0   0:00   0.01% lighttpd_pfb
       5149 root          3  20    0    18M  7168K select   1   0:06   0.01% pcscd
      85427 root          5  52    0    11M  2592K uwait    1   0:00   0.01% dpinger
        346 root          1  52    0   102M    39M accept   0   2:03   0.00% php-fpm
      48256 root          1  52    0   102M    39M accept   1   1:06   0.00% php-fpm
      44666 root          1  52    0   102M    39M accept   1   0:51   0.00% php-fpm
      62020 root          1  23    0   102M    38M accept   0   0:35   0.00% php-fpm
      19548 root          1  20    0    11M  2648K select   0   0:07   0.00% syslogd
      95969 root          2  20    0   229M   191M bpf      0   0:02   0.00% snort
      19460 root          1  20    0   104M    36M nanslp   0   0:01   0.00% php-cgi
       8574 root          1  20    0    30M  9792K kqread   0   0:01   0.00% nginx
      49739 root          1  20    0    61M    39M piperd   0   0:00   0.00% php_pfb
        345 root          1  20    0   102M    27M kqread   0   0:00   0.00% php-fpm
      31190 root          1  20    0    12M  2956K bpf      1   0:00   0.00% filterlog
       8290 root          1  20    0    29M  9248K kqread   1   0:00   0.00% nginx
       9162 root          1  45    0    11M  2484K nanslp   1   0:00   0.00% cron
      24662 root          1  20    0    21M  8448K select   0   0:00   0.00% mpd5
        376 root          1  40   20    11M  2840K kqread   0   0:00   0.00% check_reload_status
      49643 root          1  20    0    11M  2212K kqread   0   0:00   0.00% tail_pfb
      54837 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      0   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
      56501 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      0   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
      [2.5.2-RELEASE][admin@
      
      
      GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GertjanG
        Gertjan @maddy_in65
        last edited by

        @maddy_in65

        Well ?
        Who is this : ntopng ? I don't know what it is. Is it useful ? It's going at light speed (132 % CPU usage !?!). For me, that alarming. What if that "ntopng" is doing a lot of DNS requests ? That would explain something.
        You stopped it ?

        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
        Edit : and where are the logs ??

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          maddy_in65
          last edited by

          Yes I stopped it. CPU utilization is normal but Memory utilization is still high.
          453c755f-e36f-4315-b809-223e57e9293d-image.png

          GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GertjanG
            Gertjan @maddy_in65
            last edited by

            Use top again.
            It shows the memory usage per process also.
            Who is the winner ?

            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
            Edit : and where are the logs ??

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • provelsP
              provels
              last edited by provels

              Isn't high memory usage the nature of the Beastie anyway (file caching)?
              I figure I paid for 100% of the memory and CPU and as long as I'm not running out, that's good ROI.

              Peder

              MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
              BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                maddy_in65
                last edited by

                One thing I noticed post 2.5.2 upgrade is that most clients are loosing internet connection for a while and connects back. I have observed this on few WLAN clients (mobile, tablets), they shows no connectivity . I thought it might be issue with AP (Unifi). I tried rebooting APs but issue still persists. I also check on few LAN clients and they also had similar issue. I have removed pfblocker and the issue didn't appear again. Today I have installed pfblocker again with unbound mode and few feeds. As of now all clients are stable and I am monitoring devices.

                Unbound and Snort has major memory utilization.

                last pid: 31316;  load averages:  0.81,  0.68,  0.72                                                                up 0+06:28:52  15:51:28
                65 processes:  1 running, 64 sleeping
                CPU:  1.4% user,  0.0% nice,  0.6% system,  0.2% interrupt, 97.9% idle
                Mem: 951M Active, 273M Inact, 531M Wired, 208K Buf, 1988M Free
                ARC: 214M Total, 126M MFU, 84M MRU, 257K Anon, 1113K Header, 3189K Other
                     114M Compressed, 368M Uncompressed, 3.22:1 Ratio
                Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
                
                  PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    C   TIME    WCPU COMMAND
                  347 root          1  21    0   102M    39M accept   1   0:38   1.56% php-fpm
                17542 root          2  20    0   230M   193M bpf      1   2:03   0.49% snort
                90137 root          1  20    0    13M  3540K CPU1     1   0:00   0.11% top
                70928 root          1  20    0    18M  7924K kqread   0   0:01   0.10% lighttpd_pfb
                32031 root          1  20    0    28M  8616K kqread   0   0:03   0.08% nginx
                 6428 root          3  20    0    23M    11M select   0   0:12   0.05% pcscd
                21702 root          3  20    0   238M   197M bpf      1   0:03   0.04% snort
                 4582 root          1  20    0   104M    36M nanslp   1   0:02   0.03% php-cgi
                 4447 root          1  20    0    11M  2652K select   1   0:03   0.03% syslogd
                71496 root          1  20    0    59M    38M piperd   1   0:01   0.02% php
                37225 dhcpd         1  20    0    23M    12M select   0   0:00   0.02% dhcpd
                23994 root          5  52    0    11M  2592K uwait    1   0:00   0.02% dpinger
                36222 root          1  20    0    12M  2960K bpf      1   0:01   0.02% filterlog
                78612 zabbix        1  20    0    19M  9056K nanslp   1   0:00   0.02% zabbix_agentd
                24559 root          5  52    0    11M  2592K uwait    1   0:00   0.01% dpinger
                33035 root          1  20    0    19M  6900K select   0   0:03   0.01% ntpd
                28353 root          1  20    0    20M  9208K select   0   0:00   0.01% sshd
                71058 root          1  20    0    10M  2148K kqread   1   0:00   0.01% tail_pfb
                71320 root          1  20    0    61M    39M piperd   0   0:00   0.00% php_pfb
                  345 root          1  20    0   102M    27M kqread   1   0:01   0.00% php-fpm
                76619 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      0   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                75582 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      0   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                74827 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                76215 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                75224 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                74047 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                76918 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                75978 root          1  20    0    44M    35M bpf      1   0:00   0.00% arpwatch
                28242 unbound       2  20    0   383M   367M kqread   0   0:36   0.00% unbound
                46839 root          1  52    0   104M    40M accept   1   0:33   0.00% php-fpm
                  346 root          1  39    0   101M    39M accept   0   0:32   0.00% php-fpm
                
                
                GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GertjanG
                  Gertjan @maddy_in65
                  last edited by

                  @maddy_in65 said in pfBlocker not logging after 2.5.2 pfSense upgrade:

                  28242 unbound 2 20 0 383M 367M kqread 0 0:36 0.00% unbound

                  I have

                  55688 unbound       2  20    0   105M    82M kqread   1   2:57   0.00% unbound
                  

                  The difference is probably tour DNSBL usage (pfBlockerNG).

                  Still, these values are ok.

                  Btw : i'm not trying to block "everybody", as many and/or huge DNSBL/IP feeds do impact the system.
                  I'm just using the minimal :

                  8c85bd85-0ce7-46be-a445-7f8769c76648-image.png

                  No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                  Edit : and where are the logs ??

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    marcosm Netgate @Gertjan
                    last edited by

                    Using the latest pfBlockerNG-devel, IP stats won't work unless using auto rules. If using only the "Alias" actions, i.e. custom rules, the package is not able to keep track of the rule matches. I imagine this is the intended behavior.

                    Note: I've only tested on 21.05.

                    RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • RonpfSR
                      RonpfS @marcosm
                      last edited by RonpfS

                      @marcos-ng From the under Action it says :

                      Note:
                      
                      When manually creating 'Alias' type firewall rules, Prefix the Firewall rule Description with pfb_ .
                      This will ensure that that Dashboard widget reports those statistics correctly. 
                      
                      Do not prefix with (pfB_) as those Rules will be auto-removed by package when 'Auto' rules are defined.
                      

                      2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                      Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                      Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        marcosm Netgate @RonpfS
                        last edited by marcosm

                        @ronpfs
                        I missed that, thanks. I suppose then this should be confirmed by whomever reports that it's not working.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • n3xus_x3N
                          n3xus_x3
                          last edited by n3xus_x3

                          Hello,
                          today i updated the latest version of pfsense (2.5.2) , and i have the same problem . In the DNSBL configuration , i changed to localhost , i uninstalled pfblockerNG-devel,reinstalled , I have updated the lists , but i still have the same problem .
                          Someone solved it?
                          pfsense2.png

                          GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GertjanG
                            Gertjan @n3xus_x3
                            last edited by

                            @n3xus_x3 said in pfBlocker not logging after 2.5.2 pfSense upgrade:

                            Someone solved it?

                            The initial issue was : pfBlockerNG stopped blocking.
                            Thus is stops logging.
                            I tend to say that's quiet normal.

                            Here are the 'pfBlockerNG' files :

                            ls -al /var/unbound/var/log/pfblockerng/
                            

                            You means these files are not growing in size for you ?

                            Your stats say : it blocks things, as numbers are shown in the "Packet" column.

                            @n3xus_x3 said in pfBlocker not logging after 2.5.2 pfSense upgrade:

                            , i changed to localhost

                            Changed what ? Where ?

                            'localhost' is the default, and works :

                            0effc049-d73d-4035-90a6-bab98b6dbcd4-image.png

                            Or I do not understand what you mean by "i changed to localhost".

                            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                            Edit : and where are the logs ??

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • n3xus_x3N
                              n3xus_x3
                              last edited by

                              Thanks for replay
                              in pfblockerng/alerts/Reports , i noticed that after pfsense update, the contents are not blocked like before , in the Deny section it seems that everything works
                              deny.png

                              The problem is on DNSBL Block , it seems to me that the lists work randomly , I'm sure they should be a lot more
                              DNSBL_Block.png
                              these are my DNS settings
                              dns.png
                              I don't use Python mode in DNSBL

                              GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GertjanG
                                Gertjan @n3xus_x3
                                last edited by

                                @n3xus_x3

                                I advise you look up why this so called Python mode was introduced.
                                There are some reddit posts where the author explains it.

                                To make a long story short :
                                To make DNSBL work better, info is needed that unbound won't log in detail.
                                Or worse, won't make available any more.
                                But, recently, the latest unbound versions, could interface with 'plugins' written in Python.

                                So, thre solution was : this python mode.
                                Unbound has to be used as a resolver of course - not as a forwarder as you do.

                                No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  SillieWous @Gertjan
                                  last edited by

                                  @gertjan

                                  The initial issue was : pfBlockerNG stopped blocking.

                                  Not sure what you're referring to here. The topic of this thread is 'stopped logging' not stopped blocking.

                                  So, thre solution was : this python mode.

                                  As long as that isn't fully compatible with the rest of pfSense e.g. Python DNSBL mode is not compatable with the DNS Resolver DHCP Registration option (Unbound will Crash)! that advise doesn't hold up. I'd gladly switch to python mode, however I can't.

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • V
                                    vjizzle @SillieWous
                                    last edited by

                                    @silliewous Hi! I solved this problem by disabling dnsbl mode in pfblocker and moving that functionality over to a rpi4 with adguard home. Pfblocker with dnsbl was giving me all kinds of crazy behavior and in the end I just need my internet to work while wfh.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • n3xus_x3N
                                      n3xus_x3
                                      last edited by

                                      I changed to python mode in DNSBL settings , it works a little better, I mean more content is blocked ,but i think to go back to the previous version of pfsense,I've never had any problems and all the lists I have are working fine

                                      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • V
                                        vjizzle @n3xus_x3
                                        last edited by vjizzle

                                        @n3xus_x3 Be aware that older versions of pfsense cannot run the latest version of pfblockerng which have a lot of fixes compared to older versions. For the time being pfblockerng looks death and is not actively being worked on, from what I can see at least.

                                        GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • GertjanG
                                          Gertjan @vjizzle
                                          last edited by

                                          @MG85

                                          Here is my regex.
                                          It's more test-of-proof sample for me. I remember finding it somewhere on Reddit.

                                          ^(.+[_.-])?adse?rv(er?|ice)?s?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX1
                                          ^(.+[_.-])?telemetry[_.-] #Regex RGX2
                                          ^ad([sxv]?[0-9]*|system)[_.-]([^.[:space:]]+\.){1,}|[_.-]ad([sxv]?[0-9]*|system)[_.-] #test RGX3
                                          ^adim(age|g)s?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX4
                                          ^adtrack(er|ing)?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX5
                                          ^advert(s|is(ing|ements?))?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX6
                                          ^aff(iliat(es?|ion))?[_.-] #Regex RGX7
                                          ^analytics?[_.-] #Regex RGX8
                                          ^banners?[_.-] #Regex RGX9
                                          ^beacons?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX10
                                          ^count(ers?)?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX11
                                          ^mads\. #Regex RGX12
                                          ^pixels?[-.] #Regex RGX13
                                          ^stat(s|istics)?[0-9]*[_.-] #Regex RGX14
                                          

                                          Keep in mind : the ending
                                          "Space # text string" needs to be unique.

                                          No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                          Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.