Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM Support?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    189 Posts 19 Posters 84.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      silvercharge
      last edited by silvercharge

      I have the single port version of the QNAP Intel i225-LM running on bare metal 2.5.2 CE. Reading this thread, it seems that Intel i225-LM is supported. Any known reason or thoughts why the igc drivers are not loaded and interface is not recognized on my install? Model of card is QXG-2G1T-I225.

      Thank you.

      none2@pci0:4:0:0:       class=0x020000 card=0xc0011baa chip=0x15f28086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00
          vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
          device     = 'Intel(R) Ethernet Controller I225-LM'
          class      = network
          subclass   = ethernet
      
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Looks identical to the one shown here: https://forum.netgate.com/post/993924
        Check the boot log for errors when the driver tries to attach.

        Steve

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          silvercharge @stephenw10
          last edited by silvercharge

          @stephenw10 Found something pretty interesting...

          May be a red herring. I do have an onboard intel NIC that was loading fine as em0. I have since disabled it. Error persists whether the onboard nic is enabled or disabled in the bios.

          igc0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 PCI-Express Network Driver> mem 0xe1b00000-0xe1bfffff,0xe1c00000-0xe1c03fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3
          igc0: Setup of Shared code failed, error -2
          igc0: IFDI_ATTACH_PRE failed 6
          device_attach: igc0 attach returned 6
          
          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            silvercharge @silvercharge
            last edited by

            @silvercharge There seems to be some type incompatibility between a quad port Broadcom card and the I225-LM installed. When the Broadcom's link state is down, then the igc0 driver can load successfully.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Hmm, curious. So it works with the Broadcom NIC still installed but simply not linked?

              But, yes, that's some low level failure preventing the driver attaching.

              Steve

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                silvercharge @stephenw10
                last edited by silvercharge

                @stephenw10 Agree. Although I have all offloading is disabled in 2.5.2 CEA, a quick search show similar complaints over the years (e.g. intel & broadcom incompatibly).

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Yeah, no amount of offload disabling is doing to help if the driver doesn't attach. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Anyone able to test this in a 2.6 snapshot?

                    It looks like 2.5.2 missed this fix for UDP checksum offloading.
                    That is in 2.6.

                    Steve

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • B
                      bk150 @stephenw10
                      last edited by bk150

                      @stephenw10 I'll throw the 2.6 snapshot on a flash drive and test it right now.

                      Edit: It looks like everything works with the I225-LM NICs on the 2020806 build. Upon fresh installation, DNS and IPv6 were working without making any changes. I navigated to System > Advanced > Networking and verified that the disable hardware checksum offloading option was not checked.

                      I'm about to head out of town soon so let me know if you want anything specific checked. Otherwise I can dig further early next week.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • S
                        slk2k @bk150
                        last edited by

                        @bk150

                        Did you have anything in the HW things disabled (Checksum, TSO, LRO)??

                        Thanks!

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          TSO and LRO should be disabled by default anyway.

                          @bk150 said in Intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM Support?:

                          verified that the disable hardware checksum offloading option was not checked.

                          So that's all the offloading option at their defaults should work in 2.6.

                          Steve

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            slk2k @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10

                            I was curious of his testing. I ran for years with everything enabled using my 2 port Broadcom LOM on my Dell r220. Never a problem. I understand it's against what is recommended, but the Broadcom drivers for my NICs were mature and handled everything correctly without issue.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bk150 @slk2k
                              last edited by

                              @slk2k I left everything at the default.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                slk2k @bk150
                                last edited by

                                @bk150

                                Awesome - thanks!!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  silvercharge @silvercharge
                                  last edited by

                                  @silvercharge FWIW, in my scenario, I had to ensure that only i225 NICs were installed in a system. If any other NICs, (intel, broadcom, etc.) were installed then the i225 driver would fail to load over 90% of the time. I tested on two distinct systems.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    whizatit
                                    last edited by

                                    Eyeing post intently, drooling with anticipation...

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • W
                                      whizatit @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      This post is deleted!
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W
                                        whizatit @stephenw10
                                        last edited by whizatit

                                        @stephenw10 said in Intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM Support?:

                                        @whizatit said in Intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM Support?:

                                        currently running a 1000 Gb connection

                                        You're gonna need a big CPU! ๐Ÿ˜œ

                                        There is no i225 support in current pfSense. But there will be at some point.

                                        Steve
                                        I JUST now got that, I feel dumb now thanks lol

                                        As for the rest of the post... I'm looking for at least a 2 port 2.5Gb card as internet here is/can/does have that speed for download. The card I originally posted about here just caught my eye. I still have not purchased a 2.5G card as I have seen conflicting information about everyone of them from the traffic graphs not working, cards not supported etc etc...

                                        Are there ANY currently working 2.5Gb cards available that are 100% compatible with pfsense? Preferably one with a built on fan as this is not going into a rack server and case fans do not have enough CFM for the most part for a high bandwidth card. No fan no problem i can add one, it would just make it more plug and pray!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Most of the issues on this thread seem to be from UDP checksum which you can easily disable or run a 2.6 snapshot. We've seen no issues running the i225-V in the 6100.

                                          Steve

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • W
                                            whizatit @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            @stephenw10
                                            on the 6100? sorry confused.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.