Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Looking to move pfsense from vm to hardware - solutions under $300?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    25 Posts 14 Posters 6.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      duren
      last edited by

      mauroman, thank you for the correction. I scanned through the thread too fast  :-[

      Pippin, thank you for the confirmation, much appreciated.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • PippinP
        Pippin
        last edited by

        Welcome.

        One thing to add, keep in mind that this was without any other packages installed and no other traffic flowing.

        I gloomily came to the ironic conclusion that if you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.
        Halton Arp

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          icest0rm
          last edited by

          @mauroman33:

          There is the AES-NI support because the CPU is the Celeron N3150.
          I did'nt pay customs fee because they have declared a value of USD30.

          I sent you a PM

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mauroman33
            last edited by

            @icest0rm:

            @mauroman33:

            There is the AES-NI support because the CPU is the Celeron N3150.
            I did'nt pay customs fee because they have declared a value of USD30.

            I sent you a PM

            I answered you

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              edwardwong
              last edited by

              @Pippin:

              The second idea is the difference between 948 Mbps normal and 270 Mbps OpenVPN (unencrypted). Mainly caused by packets travelling between kernel and userland, and OpenVPN`s internal fragmenting and defragmenting, here CPU power (of single core!!!) comes into play.

              When version OpenVPN 2.4 is ready, bringing AES-GCM, it is expected that throughput will go up.

              The other issue probably related to process threading, the "pf" is now capable to support multi-threading, while as what I remember OpenVPN doesn't, for those low end ATOM devices we usually need 1-2 core's power to have NAT running at 1Gbps throughput, which means if we allow only single core operation the NAT probably will be cap at ~700Mbps, and OpenVPN will have more impact because it's adding burden on the CPU as well.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.