Using pfsense to forward all traffic to another pfsense



  • Hello

    Originally I had:

    WAN -> Draytek router -> small Switch -> PFSENSE 1 ->  LAN  (high avail)
                                                                -> PFSENSE 2 -> LAN    (high avail)

    I was dual NATING but it worked fine and I actually preferred having it.

    I was forced to remove the Draytek, and now I have:

    WAN    -> PFSENSE1 -> LAN  (high avail)
    empty  -> PFSENSE2 -> LAN  (high avail)  (I have to manually plug the WAN cable into PFSENSE2 when PFSENSE1 box fails)

    What I want to have again is a router after the WAN cable and before PFSENSE1/2, so I can have true high availability.

    I was thinking on using another PFsense box for the router.

    WAN -> PFSENSE ROUTER -> small switch -> PFSENSE1 -> LAN  (high avail)
                                                                    -> PFSENSE2 -> LAN  (high avail)

    I tried this method above, and everything worked, except Dual Nating.  I could not open ports from PFSENSE ROUTER -> PFSENSE1 -> LAN client.

    Whats the best way to go at this?

    I also need PFSENSE ROUTER to preserve the manual Outbound static ports defined on PFSENSE1 for voip calls to work.



  • Why don't you connect the switch to WAN directly? If you do so you can drop out one point of failure.



  • @viragomann:

    Why don't you connect the switch to WAN directly? If you do so you can drop out one point of failure.

    Because CARP requires 3 addresses and my ISP only provides /30 on their subnet.



  • There is no need for the 3 addresses to be in the same subnet since version 2.2. You may set the interface addresses to a private subnet.

    However, this solution prevents the backup box from accessing the internet and getting updates, cause this require the unique public IP which is occupied by the master. I don't know, if there is a workaround for that, otherwise you will have to switch the master box in "CARP maintenance mode" for updates.
    However, fail-over would go automatically, so for me this would be the better solution.



  • The inside boxes are running 2.1.5.

    Either way, I am looking for the best way to pass all traffic from the PFsense router -> PFsense1. Dual-nating or DMZ? how to make a DMZ? isn't DMZ a port forwarding of all traffic instead of just one port?

    Because my previous test of dual nating a single port failed, and I am wondering what could possibly be happening or if there is something I dont know about.

    Dual nating worked well with draytek -> Pfsense1



  • You can enable UPnP, and try out. In most cases, it works.



  • I have a simular question, I just want to use both at the same time and have both access each others LAN (both have the same multiple VLAN interfaces)