Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    TP-Link Easy Smart Switch security question

    Hardware
    44
    185
    78.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      belt9
      last edited by

      Security wise for a switch on WAN how about a RADIUS server?

      Doesn't pfSense even have a package for that?

      Never used it before so might not work at all?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        What?

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lexxaiL
          lexxai
          last edited by

          Will add about security of this devices…
          TL-SG1016DE security of changes value without any authentication.
          It from testing of my device… VLAN1 is problem.
          Now SG1016DE used only internally.

          –
          We have what we have. Everything that happens - for the better.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            tpham3783
            last edited by

            Hi guys,

            Since TP-Link refused to give me the source code so I decided to take on this issue myself.

            Here is how you can hack ( un-member ports on vlan1).  I have already tested on the SG108PE (hw version 3) switch and it worked.

            1.  Setup your vlan configuration as usual
            2.  Save the config (config.cfg)
            3.  Open it up with a Hex-editor.  Right after the text "Default_VLAN" you will see FF (that's basically means all 8 ports are member of untagged vlan1).  Change it to 00 if you want to un-member all ports from vlan1.  As shown in the attached picture, I changed it to 80 because I still wanted port 8 to be a member of vlan1 so that I can manage the switch from web-gui.
            4.  Save the file, restore the modified config in system:system_tools:restore_config
            5.  Wait for the switch to reboot, goto vlan config, notice that ports belonging to vlan1 are changed.

            Cheers!  I still hope for tp-link to fix this VLAN1 bug one day!  This is just a work-around.

            tp_vlan1_disable_all_ports.png
            tp_vlan1_disable_all_ports.png_thumb
            tp_link_unmember_vlan1_hack.png
            tp_link_unmember_vlan1_hack.png_thumb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JKnottJ
              JKnott
              last edited by

              I'll have to give that a try with my 5 port switch.  I don't suppose you'd have a fix for their TL-WA901N access point.  ;)
              It has the same problem where data from the native LAN leaks into the VLAN & 2nd SSID.

              I think those TP Link engineers need a lesson or 2 on VLANs.

              PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
              i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
              UniFi AC-Lite access point

              I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JKnottJ
                JKnott
                last edited by

                That fix doesn't seem to apply to the TL-SG105E switch.

                PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                UniFi AC-Lite access point

                I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tpham3783
                  last edited by

                  @JKnott:

                  That fix doesn't seem to apply to the TL-SG105E switch.

                  Were you able to see the port assignment changed in step# 5?

                  by the way, i saw vlan isolation w/ the work-around solution.  The only thing I saw strange was that the switch's IP address is a member of all vlans.  If I were to change my PC's IP address to the same subnet of the switch, I could communicate to it on non-native vlan, which is kinda weird.

                  However, the switch is no longer behaving like a dumb switch because ports are removed from vlan1.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    I will give this a try on 105E v2 tonight when I get home..  Great info.. Thanks.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • lexxaiL
                      lexxai
                      last edited by

                      Some analyze information about apply this method to TL-SG1016DE (HW:2)

                      vlan:777,port: 5tag, name: TESTVVV
                      777 = 0x0309 (0x09 0x03)
                      5 =  0x10  (0001 0000) 5 bit.

                      vlan:777,port: 5untag, name: TESTVVV
                      777 = 0x0309 (0x09 0x03)
                      5 =  0x10  (0001 0000) 5 bit.

                      source: http://lexxai.pp.ua

                      –
                      We have what we have. Everything that happens - for the better.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • thuetyT
                        thuety
                        last edited by

                        @tpham3783:

                        Here is how you can hack ( un-member ports on vlan1).  I have already tested on the SG108PE (hw version 3) switch and it worked.

                        Worked on my TL-SG108E 2.0, thanks!
                        Why didn't I think of this…  ::)

                        sg108e_vlan1_hack.PNG
                        sg108e_vlan1_hack.PNG_thumb

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JKnottJ
                          JKnott
                          last edited by

                          Were you able to see the port assignment changed in step# 5?

                          No, there was very little recognizable text in the hex editor.  I did not see the word "Default", as shown in lexxai's post.

                          The only thing I saw strange was that the switch's IP address is a member of all vlans.  If I were to change my PC's IP address to the same subnet of the switch, I could communicate to it on non-native vlan, which is kinda weird.

                          On managed switches I've worked on, there was a specific management interface, which was assigned an IP address.  I've also set up networks where the management interface was on a separate VLAN.

                          PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                          i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                          UniFi AC-Lite access point

                          I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thuetyT
                            thuety
                            last edited by

                            @JKnott:

                            The only thing I saw strange was that the switch's IP address is a member of all vlans.  If I were to change my PC's IP address to the same subnet of the switch, I could communicate to it on non-native vlan, which is kinda weird.

                            On managed switches I've worked on, there was a specific management interface, which was assigned an IP address.  I've also set up networks where the management interface was on a separate VLAN.

                            Even after setting the VLAN 1 membership to port 8 only… I can still connect a client to any switch port, set the IP to the same subnet and then access the switch web login.
                            So the VLAN 1 has no relevance for web admin access... I guess we can kill all VLAN 1 membership with the HEX hack..!?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm, well this is interesting. Implies it's a gui limitation only.

                              The exact string Default_VLAN does not appear in the config from a TL-SG1016DE v1. Not quite the same as the v2 either. Some experimentation needed….

                              Steve

                              ![Config(1).cfg - GHex_311.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Config(1).cfg - GHex_311.png)
                              ![Config(1).cfg - GHex_311.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Config(1).cfg - GHex_311.png_thumb)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                tpham3783
                                last edited by

                                @thuety:

                                Even after setting the VLAN 1 membership to port 8 only… I can still connect a client to any switch port, set the IP to the same subnet and then access the switch web login.
                                So the VLAN 1 has no relevance for web admin access... I guess we can kill all VLAN 1 membership with the HEX hack..!?

                                I saw that too.  It looks like the switch (management IP) is a member of all vlans, and that the gui an be accessed from any access-ports.  However, the gui can not be accessed on a trunk port (tagged port), unless you configure another vlan w/ the trunk port configured as untagged port.  Attached is a picture of my improved config where I ended up removing all ports from vlan1.

                                Although I can access the swith's management interface on any access-ports (untagged ports), I can not access PCs that belong on another VLAN.  Would you please confirm that's what you're seeing too?  thanks

                                config.png
                                config.png_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  tpham3783
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10:

                                  Hmm, well this is interesting. Implies it's a gui limitation only.

                                  The exact string Default_VLAN does not appear in the config from a TL-SG1016DE v1. Not quite the same as the v2 either. Some experimentation needed….

                                  Steve

                                  yeah, keep on working at it.  I'd create one vlan (ie. vlan 2) with all ports as untagged member, save the config.  Then generate a second config with the last port removed from the vlan.  Diff the two files ie:

                                  hexdump -C config.cfg.original > /tmp/config.cfg.original.hex # vlan2 w/ all ports
                                    hexdump -C config.cfg > /tmp/config.cfg.hex  # vlan2 w/ all ports but the last port

                                  diff -urN /tmp/config.cfg.original.hex /tmp/config.cfg.hex

                                  Then you would have a good idea where the vlan config token is set.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • N
                                    n3by
                                    last edited by

                                    Sg108E: at least in GUI I deleted default vlan 1.

                                    ![2017-11-12 16.50.09.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2017-11-12 16.50.09.jpg)
                                    ![2017-11-12 16.50.09.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2017-11-12 16.50.09.jpg_thumb)
                                    tplink108.jpg
                                    tplink108.jpg_thumb

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Seems to have some file validation/checksum that prevents uploading a modified file…. no one else seeing that? I'd be surprised if they actually removed that from the v2.

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • N
                                        n3by
                                        last edited by

                                        Tested and NO checksum for:
                                        Firmware Version 1.0.2 Build 20160526 Rel.34615
                                        Hardware Version TL-SG108E 2.0

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Hmm, using:

                                          Firmware Version 1.0.1 Build 20131023 Rel.33236
                                          Hardware Version TL-SG1016DE 1.0

                                          Refuses any edited config

                                          Invalid config file! Please double check!

                                          Yet lexxai seems to be good on his 1016DEv2….

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jahonixJ
                                            jahonix
                                            last edited by

                                            Check if there's a checksum or such yourself?

                                            a) save config_1
                                            b) change something small like hostname one character from lower to upper case. Don't change length.
                                            c) save config_2
                                            d) diff config_1 and config_2

                                            e) report result.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.