Some 2.3.3 widgets and graphs don't work in Brave browser v13.4



  • Some widgets and graphs don't work in Brave browser v13.4, they seem to work fine in other browsers I've tried.

    On the dashboard the traffic graph and interface statistics are not updating, I see this error message on the console:

    Uncaught DOMException: Failed to read the 'localStorage' property from 'Window': Access is denied for this document.
        at http://172.16.0.1/:692:2
        at HTMLDocument. <anonymous>(http://172.16.0.1/js/pfSense.js:276:3)
        at i (http://172.16.0.1/vendor/jquery/jquery-1.12.0.min.js:2:27451)
        at Object.fireWith [as resolveWith] (http://172.16.0.1/vendor/jquery/jquery-1.12.0.min.js:2:28215)
        at Function.ready (http://172.16.0.1/vendor/jquery/jquery-1.12.0.min.js:2:30008)
        at HTMLDocument.K (http://172.16.0.1/vendor/jquery/jquery-1.12.0.min.js:2:30370)</anonymous>
    

    Under status - monitoring the NTP graph isn't working with this error message:

    Uncaught DOMException: Failed to read the 'localStorage' property from 'Window': Access is denied for this document.
        at calculate_summary (http://172.16.0.1/status_monitoring.php:1256:3)
        at Object.generate (http://172.16.0.1/status_monitoring.php:1242:5)
        at renderLoop (http://172.16.0.1/vendor/nvd3/nv.d3.js:99:27)
    

    Is this a Brave browser bug that I should report to them of a pfSense problem?


  • Banned

    @stan-qaz:

    Some widgets and graphs don't work in Brave browser v13.4

    SCNR.  :P :P :P


  • Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate

    If it works in every other browser but that one, I'd say the odds are high that it's a bug in that browser.



  • Never heard of Brave until now.  A primitive Chromium fork with a "feature" that replaces a website's ads with ads from Brave's own ad network.  Sounds a little unethical to me.



  • Thanks for reminding me why I avoid these forums.



  • I don't know why you would say that.  You got:

    1. biting, sarcastic comedy
    2. the actual answer that you and everyone else suspected was the case
    3. opinion slightly related to the original topic

    and all at no extra charge  :D


Log in to reply