Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Release 1.2.1

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 1.2.1-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems-RETIRED
    18 Posts 11 Posters 9.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      eri--
      last edited by

      If you want to support a Release Engineer(re@) for pfSense it would be really nice otherwise please accpet the reality.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dstroot
        last edited by

        @Perry:

        http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/When_Will_A_Release_Occur

        That link says "A development timeline will be made available in the coming months to provide some guidance as to our release plans along with some rough estimates on dates."

        Retrieved from "http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/When_Will_A_Release_Occur"

        That's all I was suggesting was necessary.  However there is way too much emphasis on squashing anyone who asks "the forbidden question" - i.e. "any idea when the next release will happen?"  Instead of providing a minimal amount of guidance.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eri--
          last edited by

          Its not a problem of forbidden question.
          If you want to be safe by support if you want to accept open source and its "when its done?" please do so.

          Its no good to read that 'frequent' question of give me this than hearing 'thank you'!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            Darkk
            last edited by

            PFSense is a open-source security product and rightfully so to be a little slow with new updates to the software.  New code or updates have to be tested both in labs and out in the field over time to make sure it works before adding or making additional changes. I am running the latest snapshot of 1.2.1 RC1 and it looks solid.  Although some more testing is needed to make sure it does work with most platforms.

            Considering it is an open source product and if you have the time you can add improvements yourself so we can all benefit.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb
              last edited by

              We ran into far more problems switching to FreeBSD 7.0 than we had anticipated, some of which are very difficult kernel issues.

              In hindsight, 1.2.1 should have stayed on FreeBSD 6.x but we're too far along now to switch back. Lesson learned for the future.

              There aren't significant changes in the pfSense code from 1.2 to 1.2.1, the underlying FreeBSD version change is significant though. We can't estimate a release at this time because we have no idea what it's going to require to fix particularly one of the outstanding issues.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dstroot
                last edited by

                CMB - thanks for a fair answer.  For what it's worth I think the move to FreeBSD 7.0 is a positive thing and hopefully will help 1.3 in the long run as well.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  wallabybob
                  last edited by

                  While there has been pain using FreeBSD 7.0 I think I'm not the only one who has appreciated that decision because of the increased support for "new" hardware in FreeBSD 7.0 compared with FreeBSD 6.3

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Monoecus
                    last edited by

                    I am also very glad, that the move to FreeBSD 7 has been made now as there are some drivers that were not incorporated in 6. Regarding the deadlines I have to remind all of you that many commercial companies (such as a famous big operating system producer) very often have to reschedule their releases (sometimes by years!). So, this is not really a disadvantage of opensource projects.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      AudiAddict
                      last edited by

                      The main issue is that I'm getting my two Dell R200 machines to swap a older p4 machine.

                      I have no choice but to switch to the 1.2.1 beta otherwise it doesn't find the SAS 6i/R Internal Controller RAID PCIe for the SAS raid 1 setup :(

                      I'm hoping that the 1.2.1 will run stable in our production envoirement.. with the current pfflowd+squid package..

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cybrsrfr
                        last edited by

                        Considering that PSense 1.3 is a long way out I really appreciate that PFSense 1.2.1 will be running FreeBSD7.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.