Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 + HE tunnel –> interface subnet mask = 128

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    22 Posts 6 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GertjanG
      Gertjan
      last edited by

      @johnpoz:

      … Sorry but it seems you need a bit more play/study time before any sort of production use..

      … and the good news is : HE.net has everything covered for you - they will actually really cover you !!
      It starts here : http://he.net and click on : http://ipv6.he.net/certification and when done, use their "free" tunnel offer.
      No more questions ^^ and a very original T-shirt for free.

      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
      Edit : and where are the logs ??

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        m3xiz
        last edited by

        I am pretty sure there is an issue with the latsest version of pfSense (2.3.4). I cannot put my finger on it. At least not yet.

        On my production firewall, I received the IPv6 from my provider using DHCPv6. I also got 128 subnet preventing anything to work. As I also owned a /48 from HE. I installed a second pfsense where I can play with at will using my production firewall to provide DHCPV6 and subnet delegation.

        During all my test, I always got a 128 subnet on my test firewall (sniffing the network shows the correct /64 announcement). I try many different configuration without success. Sometimes if I used SLAAC on my test firewall it works fine (reconfiguring the main firewall accordingly) , switching to DHCPv6 seems to provide the correct result…

        It is inconsistent and so far I could not create a test that provide each time the same results that would allow a good basis to fill a bug report...

        I am still searching but this 128 subnet appears after I installed the latest release. My next step will be to install an older realease on my test firewall....I'll let you know the outcome.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.