Wireless access point efficiency
-
That is not true. You need to for proper updating of the AP's. You need it if you want to change the SSID. You need it if you want to change the password. Not sure where this guy gets his info but he is wrong!
What is not true - you sure and the F do not need to run the controller to change an SSID or PSK, or update the AP. You can do that from the APP.. Also even if you use the controller to change that stuff you do not need to leave it running.
Where are you getting your info? It sure and the F is not the unifi website. Have you ever even tried to use unifi?
https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/226395988-UniFi-Managing-Access-Points-via-UniFi-Mobile-App#stand%20aloneIn the app - click the button to update firmware of the AP.. Click the Wlan and or Radio to control the AP, etc..
-
when you do a sniff of your file copy tests are you seeing just huge amounts of retrains or something? Your iperf test if 200mbps should equate to over 10MBps in file transfer for sure if not close to 20..
What are you are you using for file transfer, windows (what flavors) - linux box running samba? What kind of latency are you seeing.. Should be in 1-2ms tops over wifi.. If your seeing large latency this can for sure cause very slow file copy in windows/samba
A sniff of your file transfer could be bring some light to what could be causing the problem.. So when you surf the net with your wifi clients and do say a speedtest at speedtest.net do you get your normal internet speeds? I see 80+ mbps down 12 up over both wired and wifi and only pay for 75/10. So I am right where it should be ;)
Do you see the same problem over 2.4 and 5? Are you running 40 or 80 on your 5.. you AC or N on the client? What does the unifi controller show you for the PHY tx/rx and are you seeing any sort of errors or utilization being heavy on the AP? Retrans, etc..
Sorry for the delayed response, have been out of town. I should get a chance to packet capture tonight or tomorrow.
On the file transfer I ran I was trying to transfer files to my Androids phone, I think the app was ES File Explorer Pro? I'll try again later with a wireless laptop running windows.
Latency from ping over wifi to wired client ranges from 1.6ms to 4.1ms with an average of ~2ms. Don't know of a way to test latency with TCP/UDP?Speedtest is generally maxed out but that doesn't mean much to me as the speed is only 150/10. The LAN performance is what is bothering me.
Same on 2.4 and 5 (5 is faster but neither are nearly as fast as they should be [per what ubiquiti controller is advertising speeds as]). I've tried all the different channel widths and multiple channels. Tried N and AC clients, tried with only AC client connected to the network and with only N client connected to the network. TX/RX rates change based on device and location relative to AP but are generally >400Mbps and always much higher than what is actually being achieved.
I'll have to check on the errors. While on teamviewer with Ubiquiti staff there were some errors but according to them not so many that should cause the performance i'm seeing.
-
"per what ubiquiti controller is advertising speeds as]"
You do understand that is PHY - that is not what you will really see.. 50% of that would be typical..
Test file copy with a real phone.. But I can tell you I sync stuff down from my plex to phone and tablet - and quick!! Never actually timed it.
-
I do not understand PHY, but regardless I'm not getting half.
I usually see ~750-800 Mbps on my phone (s) but only get ~200Mbps iperf.
-
You do not understand what PHY is?? You need to look that what what PHY is compared to what you will see in real life..
You actually think that wifi router or AP that says 450mps - is capable of 450mbps??
Have you been living in a gave.. Did you really get 11mpbs on B, did you get 54bmps with G? I showed you 360Mbps with iperf.. Why don't you post up your actual iperf tests using real devices vs some phone or tablet..
Do you make out your inter connection of 150Mbps? If so what is your complaint? What speed are you getting moving files over wifi.. You saw my 43MBps – which is clearly way more than the 2-4MBps you say your seeing.. So something is wrong, either your test method compared to your connection method or something is out of wack..
-
What is a real device? These are the devices in use on my network, I'd say they are real.
That performance is actual use, not a test.
-
Do you not have a laptop? A phone isn' going to be optimized for moving files via windows file sharing SMB..
These devices and iperf prob not going to be very high end either. Do you not have a pc or laptop to test with.. If you say your making out your internet connection via your phone at 150Mbps.. And you see 200mbps via your iperf.. Maybe the device just sucks at using SMB?
-
Possibly.
My laptop WiFi card is old and much slower than the phones. I'll try the file transfer though.
It can usually Max out the WAN but not always. Right now for example it's only hitting 100-120Mbps down
I don't know what the deal is, something is certainly wrong. So far my Archer c7v2 as an AP easily outperformed this AP AC Pro.
-
"So far my Archer c7v2 as an AP easily outperformed this AP AC Pro."
In what sense? Your Archer doing vlans? Lets see a file transfer with the same setup..
Do a test your Archer as your AP. And then same exact test with your AC Pro as AP
client – wifi -- Archer -- wire server
client -- wifi -- Unifi AP -- wire serverLets see the iperf test
Lets see the file copy test.
Lets see speed test..For when your using archer and when your using AP. When the client is in the same spot in comparison to your AP... Question for you is your AP properly mounted in the ceiling? What sort of signal strength are you clients seeing, what are they reporting? for both tx and rx speeds?
What are you showing for the AP for utilization/interface, etc. etc..
How many clients do you have connected to your AP - are other clients connected at slow speeds and really shitty signal strength? So you say your running 5ghz are you 20,40 or 80 Mhz? Are you using of the advanced features? Are time fairness? Are you using DFS channels? etc.. etc..
-
"So far my Archer c7v2 as an AP easily outperformed this AP AC Pro."
In what sense? Your Archer doing vlans? Lets see a file transfer with the same setup..
Just in speed, obviously it doesn't do VLANs (the reason I got a Ubiquiti). Not saying it's better, but it was faster.
Do a test your Archer as your AP. And then same exact test with your AC Pro as AP
client – wifi -- Archer -- wire server
client -- wifi -- Unifi AP -- wire serverLets see the iperf test
Lets see the file copy test.
Lets see speed test..I did, the archer was faster in my specific setup for whatever reason. It got in the 3-400Mbps range on iPerf. I'm certainly not interested in wasting my time hooking up an old router again and running tests that I've already run, taking screenshots, etc. just to prove a point on a forum. I'm sure that in the massive majority of use cases the Ubiquiti is faster, in mine it wasn't.
For when your using archer and when your using AP. When the client is in the same spot in comparison to your AP… Question for you is your AP properly mounted in the ceiling? What sort of signal strength are you clients seeing, what are they reporting? for both tx and rx speeds?
Same spot yes, both AP's sitting unobstructed a few feet from me. The ubiquiti wasn't mounted to the ceiling, it was about three feet away in plain sight sitting on the floor. I simply won't believe that turning the thing upside down would make a difference (although I do understand that in general ceiling mounting usually means less physical obstruction), FWIW ubiquiti support didn't seem to think that it would make a bit of difference either.
What are you showing for the AP for utilization/interface, etc. etc..
How many clients do you have connected to your AP - are other clients connected at slow speeds and really shitty signal strength? So you say your running 5ghz are you 20,40 or 80 Mhz? Are you using of the advanced features? Are time fairness? Are you using DFS channels? etc.. etc..
Normally 5-10 clients, although I've tested with only 1. No clients have abnormally low signal strength or speeds (as advertised by ubiquiti controller). I've tried 20, 40, 80 on 5GHz, tried it with 2.4 on and off. Tried it without airtime fairness and without. Tried it without DFS channels and with.
To be clear, I'm not bashing ubiquiti. I'm clearly still using the thing even though I personally experienced a drop in speed the features I gained are worth more to me. Also, their customer support is the best I've ever experienced or heard about in the consumer tech market. I've spent over two hours on teamviewer with their tech support and they are still willing to spend more time on it.
I really just brought up the question here to see if this level of performance was common or not, and if not if anyone happened to think of anything ubiquiti staff has not.
Ubiquiti AP is not the best line of AP, but it is certainly an outstanding product at it's price point. I wouldn't know but I'm betting their customer support is at least on par with options at a significantly higher price point.
-
Clearly you should be able to get more 2-4MBps file transfer.. Especially if your seeing 200Mbps iperf - your testing this with tcp and not udp right?
-
Yeah TCP.
-
Well so if doing iperf test with tcp and your seeing 200mbps - that should be reflected in your smb file copy. And you should see say roughly 25MBps minus a bit of extra overhead for smb - its a freakishly chatty protocol.. So lets call it 15-20MBps, if your seeing 4MBps then something is clearly not right.
-
yeah, just can't seem to figure it out.
The app I'm using I'm sure has something to do with it. But I tried the same file transfer over my laptop (it's old and wireless-n dual band) and it got about 7MBps.
Ubiquiti was advertising ~140Mbps at that time for the laptop, so that's pretty close.
Still the 200Mbps iperf just seems low.
-
what app are you using for iperf on your clients? The HE (hurricane electric) app - I ran this on my phone and it only shows like 140mbps.. But it doesn't seem to do very long test I only see like 1 data point at .1 second.
-
its an android app called iperf, you can run it with whatever options you like.
