2.4.0 Upgrade Killed my Speeds
-
Does sonic rely on vlan priority tagging like google apparently does? If so, maybe. If not, maybe not.
This is the important bit. I know for Google Fiber it makes all the difference but I wouldn't know about other ISPs sorry. I'm normally really hesitant to blame speed issues on a router upgrade and the only reason I'm certain the upgrade is the culprit here is because the missing priority tagging has very clearly defined behavior in this case and I did a factory reset/tcpdump to test it too.
We'll try to get that fixed up for 2.4.1 which should be out in a week or so. Assuming there isn't something crazy complicated breaking it.
Awesome, thank you!!
-
Similar case here…
We have two German Telekom DSL, which we run in parallel. After the upgrade from 2.3.4_1 to 2.4 the connection was terribly slow.
We do VLAN tagging in the DSL modem (as it did not work letting pfSense do the VLAN tagging at the time we set it up).
Nothing fancy in our setup...
Reverted back to 2.3.4_1 using VMware snapshot.
After reverting to the snapshot the connection was still slow. After a reboot all was fine, speed as before.
I'll wait for 2.4.1 and try again.
-
:(
I was on the 2.3.4_1 version before the 2.4.0 upgrade. Prior to the upgrade my Google Fiber stats were (.8ms ping with a rttd of .2ms) and a download upload of 950/950.
After the upgrade my pings are 300+ with an rttd of 500+, speeds are horrible at best, 200/10….....
Ive tried 9 different speed test sites, pings etc, im 100% its not my connection as it was tested prior to the upgrade.
Any ideas?
Just wanted to chime in and say that I've been banging my head against the wall for the past few days trying to confirm where this problem was coming from. I also have Google Fiber, and prior to 2.4.0, I was getting the down/up speeds that you mentioned (950/950). After 2.4.0, I'm getting like 350/20 (best case scenario). I'm not sure about pings, but speeds are definitely way lower. And like opalmer mentioned, the ~20 Mbps upload rate on all speed tests was the red flag that caused me concern. My family uses WiFi for most everything, so we rarely get to see maximum download speeds in wireless situations, but with Google Fiber, the upload speed has always been nearly matched with whatever download speed we see reported.
My 2.4.0 upgrade went relatively smoothly - first it mentioned that it failed (nearly instantly after trying), but then I just tried again once more and it upgraded without a hitch.
I thought maybe Google Fiber was having some intermittent connection/speed issues (there's been some roadwork/utility maintenance being performed on my street by various companies over the last couple weeks), so I figured I'd give it a day or two and see if it cleared up. No luck. Then I contacted Google just to see if they would volunteer any info (if they were having any issues, a shortage, etc.) They said that they were not aware of any present issues.
This morning (several days post-2.4.0), I finally had a free minute to hook up the Google Fiber Network Box. Speeds were restored to ~1 Gbps up/down. I decided to try and reinstall pfSense fresh, so I backed up my 2.4.0 config and completely reinstalled. Restored from my backup config. Same speed issues returned.
Anyway, thanks again for starting this thread - I'm glad to know that we finally have ruled out most other complications.
If it matters to anyone, I'm running on physical hardware (not a VMWare setup) -
AMD 6400k APU @ 3.9 ghz
MSI A78M-35 Military Class 4 motherboard
4 GB DDR3 PC3 12800 @ 1600 mhz
2x Intel Gigabit PCIe cards
1 physical HDD (I forget the specs, but just a standard platter drive)Edit(s): Just clearing up some typos.
-
This seems to also be affecting me on AT&T gigapower. pfSense box I’m getting 20Mbps down/102ish Mbps up. Directly from the AT&T box, I’m getting 950Mbps/940Mbps Down/Up respectively.
I do not have any VLans setup, so I don't think that is the problem.
The pfSense box hardware:
Gigabyte Built-In Intel Celeron J1900 (2.0 GHz) Dual LAN Mini ITX DDR3 1333 NA Motherboard GA-J1900N-D3V
Crucial 8GB Kit (4GBx2) DDR3 1333 -
There is a fix for the VLAN priority issue (when set on Interfaces > Assignments, VLAN tab entries) coming in the next round of snapshots. When you see a snapshot with today's date, it should be OK to test.
-
Question did you install zfs as the file system during install ?? zfs has been a pain for me over the years as the overhead is high to run it.
-
There is a fix for the VLAN priority issue (when set on Interfaces > Assignments, VLAN tab entries) coming in the next round of snapshots. When you see a snapshot with today's date, it should be OK to test.
Do you have an ETA when it will be available via 2.4.1 ?
-
We have bumped 2.4.1 to 2.4.1-RC and we're running some internal tests on it, it should be up with the regular snapshots in the next few hours.
-
We have bumped 2.4.1 to 2.4.1-RC and we're running some internal tests on it, it should be up with the regular snapshots in the next few hours.
Thank you, so I should be able to upgrade 2.3.4-RELEASE-p1 => 2.4.1-RC I assume.
-
If you set your update settings to "Next Major Version" from 2.3.4 then it should land you there. Be sure to set it back to "Stable" once you're on 2.4.1.
-
