Unable to access a host on another subnet but can from pfSense [SOLVED]
-
Your post does not show a change in source port.. It's 52469 from the .0.3 box and when it gets forwarded from 1.1..
-
Your post does not show a change in source port.. It's 52469 from the .0.3 box and when it gets forwarded from 1.1..
OK, get it (was late :D). Still don't get why non static does not work.
-
No idea… Sniff the traffic to see what you get back from the syn that is sent.. My guess is your getting RST back from the device because there is a session open or something.
Did you try rebooting the AP?
-
Giving you some bunk info messing up between outbound NAT and port forwards. Sorry.
Set it like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8092/d80929861a9e1064a1854a4c782d22c48a7dab41" alt="Screen Shot 2017-11-11 at 7.29.43 AM.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95199/951999c27453a440878c498ff2f681e49c6723e6" alt="Screen Shot 2017-11-11 at 7.29.43 AM.png_thumb" -
Good catch Derelict.. This is outbound nat you wouldn't set the NAT.. That would be done automatic. You would do that with port forward inbound. But shouldn't it work anyway?
-
That was effectively static port. I would expect that to work intermittently at best.
-
Giving you some bunk info messing up between outbound NAT and port forwards. Sorry.
Great catch!
It now works ether way, when I set it as static or if I set it to any (non-static). I am now using (non-static)
Thank you!
-
That was effectively static port. I would expect that to work intermittently at best.
I am trying to understand this statement, can you please go into a bit more detail to explain?
I.e. Why would you expect this to work intermittently? -
Because static port sets the NAT source port so it never changes.
That was effectively setting your source port to 80 and the dest port was 80.
You can only have one firewall state from ip_address_1:80 to ip_address_2:80. So even if the browser tried to open multiple connections to the AP's web interface the potential for them to fail was there.
With static source port the NAT (PAT really) will work around that by translating the source port to any available port in the NAT table.
You do not want or need static port here. Leave it off.
-
Thanks for the info and all the help. Cheers. 8)