Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-3100 Router Advertisement Daemon

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    7 Posts 3 Posters 1.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      gsmornot
      last edited by

      SG-3100 is fantastic so far except that I cannot get IPV6 to my clients. The radvd Router Advertisement Daemon shows a red X. My previous pfSense device was built using an old desktop with an Intel dual NIC. I made a full backup of the config and used it to restore on the SG-3100. (modified the interface names) I get an IPV6 assignment on the WAN and LAN. I can use the GUI ping command to get a reply from ipv6.google.com.

      I reconnected my previous system to compare, everything still works and I see no difference in the configs. I grabbed a copy of the restore from the portal, restored the SG-3100 and built from scratch to see if the issue was my config, no difference. Still no IPV6 to my clients. I'm not sure what else to try.

      I am connected to a UVERSE gateway.
      WAN:
      IPV4-DHCP
      IPV6-DHCP6
      Request only a prefix-checked
      Delegation size-64
      Send prefix hint-checked
      block bogon networks-unchecked

      LAN:
      IPV4-Static
      IPV6-Track Interface
      WAN 0

      DHCPV6 enabled on the LAN. RA is set to Assisted. IPV6 on in System. Cant think of anything else. This is the same setup that has worked for the last year on my old system.
      Any ideas?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        This is probably why:

        https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8022

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          gsmornot
          last edited by

          @Derelict:

          This is probably why:

          https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8022

          Yes, that is the issue. If I read that correctly, 2.4.2 is going to address the issue?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            The target version for a fix is currently 2.4.2.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              gsmornot
              last edited by

              Interesting, the screen shared on Twitter with 2.4.0 beta installed shows radvd working fine. The device comes with 2.4.1 which had some changes made for the switch drivers. Just sharing.

              https://twitter.com/JeGroh/status/883043442749710336

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rudivd
                last edited by

                Hi all,

                Just received my 3100. (2.4.1-RELEASE) I need ravd to work reliably for it to
                be deployed. I have not yet tested the box with ravd, but is this bug acknowledged
                (and reproduceable ? ) ?

                Is there an estimate for 2.4.2 where a fix could | should be implemented ?

                Thanks ! Rudi

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  gsmornot
                  last edited by

                  @rudivd:

                  Hi all,

                  Just received my 3100. (2.4.1-RELEASE) I need ravd to work reliably for it to
                  be deployed. I have not yet tested the box with ravd, but is this bug acknowledged
                  (and reproduceable ? ) ?

                  Is there an estimate for 2.4.2 where a fix could | should be implemented ?

                  Thanks ! Rudi

                  See if the report matches your issue. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8022

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.