Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    How stable is 2.0 these days?

    2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    10
    16
    8233
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cino last edited by

      I'm thinking about upgrading to 2.0. I know its still in alpha testing but I only use pfsense for my home router. Yeah its overkill but i'm a IT guy. How stable is it? Basically I use the box as my firewall/port forwarding to my web server, OpenVPN server(this would be a deal breaker as I connect to my network a lot from work), and I use it as wireless access point. Think i would be safe to make the jump or wait till its from RC?

      thanks,

      Cino

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • chpalmer
        chpalmer last edited by

        Very stable here…  ;D

        Home system with voip and a webserver on the system...

        Just my observatrion.  ;)

        Triggering snowflakes one by one..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          Cino last edited by

          Are you using the TrafficShaper for your VoIP? I haven't activate it yet, but thinking about using it for my OpenVPN connection and keep p2p uploads in there place…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • chpalmer
            chpalmer last edited by

            No traffic shaper. I dont need it so I havent tried it although if I get time I would like to learn it.
            :)

            Triggering snowflakes one by one..

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • X
              xUltra last edited by

              I had a September build of 2.0A-A running on what I like to call a "semi" production environment. About 35 users, DHCP and UPNP enabled, bandwidthd, and shaping turned on for a 20mbps/3mbps connection. It worked great for my guess is 6-7 weeks and then it started to do really weird things. The LAN interface page kept coming up as a 404 error from what I remember and then the internet eventually stopped working. I had to format and do a clean install back to 1.2.

              I really cannot wait until 2.0 becomes a RC, because my experience with those in the past are rock solid!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • X
                XToni last edited by

                2.0-ALPHA-ALPHA
                built on Tue Nov 25 14:52:07 EST 2008
                FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE

                dhcp, trafic shaping, bandwidthd, 70Mb/20Mb and 200+ users behind. Working great so far. Ntop failed on this release due to high cpu utilization. I think this happen when a lot of users are online.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cino last edited by

                  i played about with it and can't seem to get openvpn to work correctly.. I'll wait for a RC since that is a show-stopper for me

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    nocer last edited by

                    Hello,
                    I just got killed by a snap yesterday :P
                    It's way toooooooooo early to ask. Should you consider 1.2.1-RC4 instead, same kernel/functionality(roughly), but different UI as you know.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sullrich last edited by

                      Snaps should be working pretty good tonite.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        nocer last edited by

                        Hi,

                        Ooops, just got killed by 20081223-0735.tgz, okay, loading 1548.tgz :P

                        cheers,

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • L
                          littlekp last edited by

                          I also decided to upgrade to 2.0 in these days
                          just considering the stability of functions
                          I need to use OpenVPN, Dual PPPoE WAN, Outbound Load Balance and common functions like NAT
                          Is there anyone has tried the 2.0 Alpha built is stable for all functions above :P
                          And I also want to know about the Embedded Version
                          Can I make the partition not only 24MB but may be 2GB as the size of my CF card :P
                          As I just upgrade my pfSense today and I found it only cost 24MB…....
                          I think it is a waste to my card

                          Thanks!!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dotdash
                            dotdash last edited by

                            @littlekp:

                            Can I make the partition not only 24MB but may be 2GB as the size of my CF card :P
                            As I just upgrade my pfSense today and I found it only cost 24MB…....
                            I think it is a waste to my card

                            To answer the off-topic part of your post:
                            You are looking at the compressed file. After you expand it to the .img, it's around 123 MB. (And the 2.0 images are 33-some MBs compressed.) There are some pointers to re-sizing the image on the DevWiki here: http://devwiki.pfsense.org/FlashHowTo

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              gladizxx last edited by

                              @Cino:

                              I'm thinking about upgrading to 2.0. I know its still in alpha testing but I only use pfsense for my home router. Yeah its overkill but i'm a IT guy. How stable is it? Basically I use the box as my firewall/port forwarding to my web server, OpenVPN server(this would be a deal breaker as I connect to my network a lot from work), and I use it as wireless access point. Think i would be safe to make the jump or wait till its from RC?

                              thanks,

                              Cino

                              Please use 2.0 alpha latest… good stable ...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                Cino last edited by

                                @gladizxx:

                                Please use 2.0 alpha latest… good stable ...

                                I tried it a couple of weeks ago and I couldn't get OpenVPN to work. That's a deal-breaker for me on the new version.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • L
                                  littlekp last edited by

                                  @dotdash:

                                  @littlekp:

                                  Can I make the partition not only 24MB but may be 2GB as the size of my CF card :P
                                  As I just upgrade my pfSense today and I found it only cost 24MB…....
                                  I think it is a waste to my card

                                  To answer the off-topic part of your post:
                                  You are looking at the compressed file. After you expand it to the .img, it's around 123 MB. (And the 2.0 images are 33-some MBs compressed.) There are some pointers to re-sizing the image on the DevWiki here: http://devwiki.pfsense.org/FlashHowTo

                                  Thanks for information and I will take care about the off topic part
                                  :P

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Slam last edited by

                                    Can anyone whose using multi wan with v2.0 tell me what build date they are using? I've tried numerous snapshots and multi wan seems to be broken, Im sure I read reports here of people successfully getting multi wan working on v2.0.

                                    Thanks

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post