Sys log flooded with "arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry"
-
I'm seeing this entry flooding my system log-
Jan 22 17:09:09 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:09:40 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:10:11 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:10:41 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:11:12 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:11:42 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:12:08 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em1 Jan 22 17:12:13 kernel arp: 00:25:90:44:11:e7 attempts to modify permanent entry for 10.0.1.20 on em110.0.1.20 is my unRAID server. Not sure if something is misconfigured there or if it's my pfsense setup. Would appreciate any advice?
-
So find the permanent ARP entry there and delete it if that is not what you want.
Usually in the DHCP static mapping as attached.
I have been doing this a long time and have never needed to use a static ARP entry. It's usually easier to just fix whatever conditions exist to make it "necessary."

 -
That or I suppose someone is trying to spoof ARP for an interface address. You would need to handle that in your switching gear.
Diagnostics > Packet Capture for ARP on that interface and see what you see.
-
Thanks. I set a reserved IP for en-0 on the unraid server and then bonded en-0 and en-1. I'm sure that's what is causing this problem. The MAC address shown in the log entry is for en-1 on the unraid server.
Just to be sure I've got it right, I just need to uncheck the ARP Table Static Entry option?
-
That or I suppose someone is trying to spoof ARP for an interface address. You would need to handle that in your switching gear.
Diagnostics > Packet Capture for ARP on that interface and see what you see.
No. I think this is caused by my own ignorance. :D