• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Port aggregation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
5 Posts 4 Posters 637 Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    TBBZ8X8
    last edited by Jul 10, 2018, 2:32 AM

    Ok so I am quite new to all of this so please bear with me.

    Essentially I have 5 Gigabit ports on my router. 1 is being used for wan 1 is being used for a vlan and then I have 3 empty ports. I would like to use the 3 ports for an aggregated lan link to my managed switch to achieve a faster connection.

    I have tried to use a bridge but it doesn't seem to like that as my network goes down as soon as I plug in more than just the main LAN1 port (so I have LAN1, LAN2, and LAN3, LAN1 is the officially designated lan port by pfsence).

    I have absolutely no use for more vlans as I only have one device that uses Ethernet. I am not worried about cpu cycles as the processors I have are a bit overpowered for this application.

    If you have any advice I would very much appreciate it. Thanks,

    J 1 Reply Last reply Jul 10, 2018, 9:35 AM Reply Quote 0
    • D
      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
      last edited by Jul 10, 2018, 2:55 AM

      https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/interfaces/lagg-interfaces.html

      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • T
        TBBZ8X8
        last edited by Jul 10, 2018, 3:39 AM

        Thank you very much

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          JKnott @TBBZ8X8
          last edited by Jul 10, 2018, 9:35 AM

          @tbbz8x8 said in Port aggregation:

          I would like to use the 3 ports for an aggregated lan link to my managed switch to achieve a faster connection.

          How fast is your Internet connection? Unless it's over 1 Gb, aggregation won't accomplish much. Only traffic to/from the Internet passes through pfSense.

          PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
          i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
          UniFi AC-Lite access point

          I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by Jul 10, 2018, 9:46 AM

            @tbbz8x8 said in Port aggregation:

            I have absolutely no use for more vlans as I only have one device that uses Ethernet

            @jknott said in Port aggregation:

            Unless it's over 1 Gb, aggregation won't accomplish much

            Even if over 1 gig, wouldn't matter lagg is not going to allow 1 device to use more than 1 physical path..

            From the OP statements - other than a failover for failed port.. I don't see any use to setting up a lag.. And what switch is he using? Most likely since he doesn't have any vlans, just the 1 lan connection more than likely doesn't even have as smart switch capable of lagg, etc.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            1 out of 5
            • First post
              1/5
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
              consent.not_received