Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [SOLVED] No Internet/NAT from OPT1

    NAT
    3
    5
    996
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      ShiroiKuma
      last edited by ShiroiKuma

      I'm trying to set up an OPT1 (Guest) NIC with full Internet Access, basically, a mirror of LAN is my goal for now. At the moment I am running pfSense on a XenServer with 3 NIC's attached to it. To test out all the rules/filtering I will need before rolling out to the main network.

      My Interfaces are:

      WAN 10.25.0.200/24 (will change in future to a public IP once un-VM'd)
      LAN 10.25.0.2/24 (Static)
      OPT1 10.25.1.2/24 (Static) (Xen Host-only Network)

      No IPv4 Upstream Gateways' are set on any of the Interfaces.

      I have enabled DHCP on OPT1 as my VM can receive an IP address. I can tell this from the DHCP Leases panel.

      My Firewall->NAT->Outbound is set to Automatic and has the following autogenerated rules.

      0_1539183421616_a2c30fd6-7c94-488d-97c0-956c9a88b84d-image.png

      Under Firewall->Rules->OPT1 I have cloned the LAN rules and set to 'any'

      0_1539183523056_c66ee49d-5676-4768-b137-8d38f8f135f7-image.png
      0_1539183493201_6d5034fd-153b-4321-abe0-4c6296364103-image.png

      Under Diagnostics->Ping I can ping from LAN to google. I can ping from OPT1 to LAN (including the Gateway), but not OPT1 to google.

      0_1539183603205_2675565e-989d-47c2-90d4-7fec7301874e-image.png
      0_1539183640094_eb84bc2d-c40b-4330-8c22-7c68c8cd5f1c-image.png
      0_1539183794499_db643870-b2d4-4d41-aae6-f46380787f0d-image.png
      0_1539183673337_2b7ced81-2960-498f-b49b-aac9fbc7534a-image.png

      I have left the Routing->Gateways at their default from a fresh install
      0_1539183753086_ecc28de1-57b4-46b1-8637-8e89ecb437f5-image.png

      I'm clearly missing something here. I am new to Networking and hence doing all of this in a HomeLab environment first. Any idea's or pointers on where to go next?

      https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/routing/connectivity-troubleshooting.html suggests an Outbound NAT problem, but then why would LAN be fine in this scenario. I went through the tests substituting LAN for OPT1 where applicable.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        @shiroikuma said in No Internet/NAT from OPT1:

        WAN 10.25.0.200/24 (will change in future to a public IP once un-VM'd)
        LAN 10.25.0.2/24 (Static)

        How did you think this would ever work? Your WAN and LAN are on the same network. OPT1 should be another bridged NIC on the same network as WAN but a different IP address.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          ShiroiKuma
          last edited by

          I'm aiming to replace an ASUS Router with pfSense as a drop-in replacement, so testing in Isolation to minimize disruption. But only 1 public IP exists, hence the temporary one. I figured pfSense would route via the Gateway on the WAN.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by Derelict

            No. @KOM is talking about your WAN and LAN being the same subnet.

            WAN 10.25.0.200/24 (will change in future to a public IP once un-VM'd)
            LAN 10.25.0.2/24 (Static)

            Make your WAN transit network something different in your testing since it sounds like changing the LAN will invalidate your test environment.

            You might have to create another interface on whatever is currently your edge on a separate subnet that does not conflict with 10.25.0.0/24 to use for the pfSense WAN.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              ShiroiKuma
              last edited by

              @Derelict I assumed having gateways defined would allow the network to smartly know the route to take and so having them on the same subnet would work. Literally never had to think about subnets until this week.

              To test, I ended up doing all my Lan stuff on 10.25.1.x instead with a Xen Private Network. Once all the VM's worked, downloaded the configuration from pfSense and did a search replace on the rules before 'restoring' the xml file and swapping the modem cables over.

              Got the home network running on a virtual pfSense okay at the moment, bare a few weird dns issues with kube-dns and dns resolution from pods. This will make it easier to move to a physical machine once ready. Just hope Xen doesn't crash at all.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.