• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

HA Setup working by no internet access from LAN

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
14 Posts 4 Posters 1.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V
    viragomann
    last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 1:36 PM

    @gsenzere said in HA Setup working by no internet access from LAN:

    could there be something I am doing wrong.

    If you have adhered strictly to the linked manual, it should word.

    Do you have configured a dedicated sync network?

    Double-check the settings for the state synchronization and the outbound NAT settings.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G
      gsenzere
      last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 2:09 PM

      Thanks viragomann for your reply. I have a dedicated Sync network via re0 interfaces on each pfsense box. If you do not mind, how do I check the state synchronization?

      On the primary box I have Synchronisation states checked, I have the synchronisation interface as the SYNC, which is my re0 and I have also defined the pfsense syncronisation peer IP defined as the SYNC IP of the secondary box. And I have a physical Ethernet cable connected between the primary re0 (SYNC) and secondary re0 (SYNC) interfaces.

      On the outbound NAT I have tried to follow the instructions on the URL link and this is what I have done;

      Selected Firewall >> NAT >> Outbound then checked "Manual Outbound NAT rule generation.
      (AON - Advanced Outbound NAT)" and clicked save. After that I see the following mappings;

      0_1546524362419_589f2bb1-81a9-49d1-a11c-33a20f4f4d5e-image.png

      I have gone into edit each of the mappings and changed the "translation" "Address" to my CARP WAN VIP. Is this how its supposed to be done on the NAT outbound?

      V 1 Reply Last reply Jan 3, 2019, 2:21 PM Reply Quote 0
      • R
        Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
        last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 2:19 PM

        jimp did a great Hangout Video covering HA on pfSense 2.4 https://www.netgate.com/resources/videos/high-availability-on-pfsense-24.html
        This will give you a great overview / tips and hints.

        -Rico

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          viragomann @gsenzere
          last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 2:21 PM

          @gsenzere said in HA Setup working by no internet access from LAN:

          I have gone into edit each of the mappings and changed the "translation" "Address" to my CARP WAN VIP. Is this how its supposed to be done on the NAT outbound?

          Only change the translation address to the WAN VIP in the outbound NAT rules for internal networks (the last two in your screenshot, the other ones are for the pfSense box itself).

          The state sync has also to be configured on the backup box.

          G 1 Reply Last reply Jan 3, 2019, 8:37 PM Reply Quote 0
          • G
            gsenzere
            last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 2:29 PM

            Thsnks again. I will change only on the last two.
            As for the state sync i also hsve the settings on the secondary box as well and the peer address is set to the sync interface ip address of the primary box. I will check on the NAT and let you know.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              gsenzere @viragomann
              last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 8:37 PM

              @viragomann @Rico Thank you both for these pointers. I have tried the following;

              I have rolled back to the two clean pfsense boxes without HA settings.
              Have started entering the HA settings by setting up the SYNC interfaces on both boxes, then added rules to pass traffic between the two interfaces. Everything works as expected until I add the WAN and LAN VIPs and add the NAT outbound mappings. so as soon as I change the translation to my WAN VIP, I loose internet connection immediately. Even if I roll back the settings (remove the NAT outbound settings ) I still can't connect to the internet. I have also been following the hangout video.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gsenzere
                last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 8:42 PM

                @viragomann @Rico I have found out something on the outbound NAT. As soon as I change the translation address on the mapping in red below, my internet connection does not work.
                0_1546547933250_cf16a128-adaa-436b-b9c7-81e0a70f0422-image.png
                I also have another router on the WAN side. So I have a static IP from the ISP which gets to a Mikrotik router and then from here I have three IPs (primary WAN, secondary WAN and WAN SHARED VIP) going towards my HA setup. I do not have a switch in-between. Could this be an issue?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 8:48 PM

                  You need to change that circled rule to the NAT to CARP VIP too.

                  As long as you have good connectivity to and from all three VIPs that should work fine with the upstream router.

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    gsenzere
                    last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 9:06 PM

                    @Derelict Thanks for replying. I have tried to change the translation address on this to my WAN VIP and as soon as i do this I have no internet on my LAN. Am I correct to change the translation adress to the WAN VIP?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 9:51 PM

                      Can you ping from the WAN VIP out to something like 8.8.8.8? You can set that as a ping source in Diagnostics > Ping for testing. You should be able to ping out to the internet sourcing from both interface addresses and the CARP VIP (from the node who holds the VIP in MASTER status).

                      If that's not working fix that first. It's fundamental to successful HA.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gsenzere
                        last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 10:17 PM

                        @Derelict Thanks for this I have checked this. I can ping the 8.8.8.8 from the two WANs but cannot ping it from the WAN VIP. This is how I created the WAN VIP;

                        Firewall >>Virtual IPs >> clicked ADD selected type as CARP, Interfaces as WAN, Address type as Single Type, for the address I selected a random IP/24 not in use but on the same subnet as the two WANs, put in a random Virtual IP Passwords that match, VHID of 30 (not in use on the network), a.f.left it at 1 and skew at 0. This is syncing to the second box as 100 as expected. and
                        as I mentioned earlier these three IPs go onto my ISP Mikrotik router. Could I be missing something here?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 10:25 PM

                          Yeah, upstream layer 2 probably isn't doing the right thing with the CARP MAC or the ARP or something. Hard to say.

                          See this:

                          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/119864/carp-ha-sync-and-xmlrpc-sync-explained

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by Jan 3, 2019, 10:29 PM

                            And this:

                            The ISP Layer 2 device will see the CARP MAC as the source MAC in the CARP advertisements. They are sent to the Layer 2 Multicast address 01:00:5e:00:00:12 (all points multicast) to Layer 3 multicast address 224.0.0.18. That MAC address has to be added to the switch port's MAC address table based on those. This MAC address will change ports on a failover event. The ISP device must move the MAC address to the new port as any switch should.

                            The ISP Layer 3 gear will get the CARP MAC in response to ARP "WHO HAS" requests for the CARP VIP address. Their gear needs to do the right thing with it. The ARP reply from the WAN interface that is currently CARP MASTER will contain the CARP MAC in the ARP "IS AT" response. This ARP response will be sourced from the interface IP and MAC address.

                            The ISP Layer 3 gear also needs to honor the interface addresses that will ARP as normal. The ISP device will only ever see the interface MAC address on the port connected to that node.

                            All references to ISP gear there should be interpreted in whatever is upstream of the two pfSense nodes in your environment. The Mikrotik and whatever else that is.

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            14 out of 14
                            • First post
                              14/14
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                              consent.not_received