Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    load balance pool working with WAN but not with LAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    4 Posts 2 Posters 402 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X
      xorpierre
      last edited by

      Hi,
      following situation:
      I got a virtual WAN IP and a virtual LAN IP. Both are using the same LB pool (https).
      From outside everything works fine (via the WAN virtual IP), but if I use the virtual LAN IP I get no return from the backend.
      I do see that the LB is working, I see states like this:
      10.3.1.51:40984 -> 10.3.1.22:443 (10.3.3.252:443) CLOSED:SYN_SENT

      I am not sure why its closed though. 10.3.3.252 being the virtual IP for the LB (used in internal DNS). Backend servers are 20-22.

      I tried everything, I am kind of out of ideas.
      My FW rules on LAN are allow everything, nothing else, just this one rule.

      Anyone got an idea?
      Thanks

      X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • X
        xorpierre @xorpierre
        last edited by

        solved, see: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/58569/is-lan-only-load-balancer-relayd-possible/4

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          If you don't like the NAT solution, you could switch to haproxy instead as well. You'll probably be much happier in the long run.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • X
            xorpierre @jimp
            last edited by

            @jimp Yea I thought about it but I'd like to keep it minimal for now. Just wanted to post the solution here, took me a while to find it. Wasn't obvious to me

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.