Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Routing to internal VLANs on switch

    Routing and Multi WAN
    4
    16
    556
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jarush last edited by

      I have an existing network with PFSense as the default router for the internal LAN with load balanced internet connections. Primary switch for the LAN is a nexus 3k. I'd like to create some new VLANs on the 3k and have them be able to talk with the existing LAN network defined on the PFSense device. Basic network diagram attached. I created a transit network (10.0.0.0/30) for the 3k and pfsense device to talk, gave the OPT1 interface an IP, defined it as a gateway and created a static route to use it to go to 10.168.20.0/24. Created a new VLAN on the 3k (10.168.20.1/24). From pfsense, i can ping all the way into the new vlan. From an existing host on the network, I can hit the new gateway on pfsense (10.0.0.2), but not the new vlan on the 3k.

      I tossed in an allow any/any/any to make sure the firewall wasn't blocking me.

      Eventually I want to move the existing 10.168.12.0/24 network onto the 3k, but I need some time to migrate hosts and just wanted to start with a new vlan for some new hosts. It feels like this should work but I'm missing something simple. Can someone point me in the right direction?0_1552676355579_basic.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpoz
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by

        @jarush said in Routing to internal VLANs on switch:

        gave the OPT1 interface an IP, defined it as a gateway

        Huh.. Why would your OPT1 be a gateway?

        You would create a gateway on pfsense to 10.0.0.1, .2 is not a gateway.. Expect for your switch.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jarush last edited by

          Maybe I'm not stating it correctly. Here is what I did:

          • on switch, create vlan 300 as 10.168.20.1/24
          • on switch, create vlan 2 as 10.0.0.1/30
          • on switch, set native vlan to 2 on e1/49 (connected to pfsense opt 1)
          • on pfsense, add gateway on interface opt1 for 10.0.0.1
          • on pfsense, set ip address on opt1 as 10.0.0.2/30, ipv4 upstream gateway set to 10.0.0.1
          • on pfsense, create static route for 10.168.20.0/24 using the 10.0.0.1 gateway

          At this point, from a shell on the pfsense box, i can ping 10.168.20.1. From host1 i can not ping 10.168.20.1. My expectation is that I would be able to - thus I believe I'm missing a setting.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpoz
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by johnpoz

            @jarush said in Routing to internal VLANs on switch:

            on pfsense, set ip address on opt1 as 10.0.0.2/30, ipv4 upstream gateway set to 10.0.0.1

            No that is not correct either! When set a gateway on the interface you just created a WAN interface that will do nat..

            You create a gateway in the routing section, and then create a route to your downstream networks.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jarush last edited by

              OK, I just removed the upstream gateway from the OPT1 interface. I do have the gateway created and the routes for the downstream networks, however, I still can't get to those downstream networks from hosts using the pfsense as the default gateway.
              Attached screenshots of the gw and static routes.
              0_1552699578626_gw.png 0_1552699589919_static gw.png

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpoz
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by johnpoz

                What PART do not get about not setting a gateway On the freaking interface!!

                0_1552699879431_gatewayfordownstream.png

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jarush last edited by

                  Apparently the core concept. In your response, are you telling me the screenshots are the way that I shouldn't be configuring it, or should? That is the way it is currently configured (with my pfsense side being 10.0.0.2 and downstream gateway being 10.0.0.1).

                  By Interface, I assumed you mean the interface that I see when I go to Interfaces -> OPT1. There is no upstream gateway set there. On the edit gateway screen, if I don't put anything in the gateway field, it says "dynamic". I don't understand how this is supposed to work if I don't tell PFsense what the downstream router IP address is.

                  My assumption, which is obviously wrong, is that I have to configure an interface on PFsense (interfaces -> OPT1) and then tell PFsense what the downstream router IP address is (System -> Routing -> Gateways), and then create a static route to tell PFsense to use this new gateway when going to certain networks. The routing table on the box seems to indicate that the way I have it configured is correct -
                  10.168.20.0/24 10.0.0.1 UGS ix0

                  And ifconfig shows the configured 10.0.0.2 IP address on ix0.

                  Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong? The current state is that the system is configured as you show above (again, with my pfsense interface being 10.0.0.2 and downstream being 10.0.0.1)

                  johnpoz 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Derelict
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate last edited by

                    0_1552720239742_pfSense-Layer-3-Switch.png

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    The pfSense Book is free of charge!
                    DO NOT set a source port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpoz
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @jarush last edited by johnpoz

                      @jarush said in Routing to internal VLANs on switch:

                      Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?

                      Dude I gave you a freaking picture of how to do it - how can you not understand this basic concept??

                      So I flipped IPs in my picture - sorry... But come on who cares which side .1 or .2 is on... The point is NO gateway on the interface!!! This is the 4th time stating this..

                      Normally is the upstream router that would have the lower number..

                      Again if you put the gateway on the INTERFACE!!! Pfsense thinks is a WAN!! And will now NAT to this ip, etc. You do not want that! Its not a wan, its a transit to a downstream router.. That is not public. Since its a "lan" interface there is not gateway set on the interface.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jarush last edited by

                        I do not have a gateway specified on the interface.
                        0_1552738742823_464a09fd-d6fe-4727-b781-1eb2674f9cda-image.png

                        I do have a gateway set on the routing -> gateways -> edit.
                        0_1552738819720_6a2cd064-7be0-4b6a-ac8c-a5213f3e4fb1-image.png

                        0_1552738952052_746a6205-b933-4021-992b-31ed246dc205-image.png

                        0_1552738988925_f49b923b-76fd-4231-917b-6737bb5e638e-image.png

                        I made my settings look like yours last night prior to posting my response.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpoz
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by

                          Ok then do a traceroute from client on your host network to your vlan network 10.168.20.1 interface

                          Does this hit
                          12.1, then 0.1 as hops

                          If you can get your 20.1 interface, but not client on 20.x then you have a problem on the host? (firewall?) Or you host in 20.x is not using 20.1 ?

                          On your firewall rules on lan and op1 are you forcing a gateway in the rules? If so your overriding pfsense routing tables.

                          Your L3 should have either default route pointing to 0.0.2 or specific routes to your 10.168.12 network.

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jarush last edited by

                            Sorry for the delayed response, was traveling.

                            Ended up being the firewall. Had the rule in but it wasn't working - unclear why as all I did was move it above another pass rule - maybe the rules just needed to be reloaded.

                            Appreciate the patience.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Derelict
                              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate last edited by

                              Rules are processed top down. First match stops processing. If you examine the rule set you will probably see why the more-specific rule needed to be higher.

                              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                              The pfSense Book is free of charge!
                              DO NOT set a source port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jarush last edited by

                                But they were all pass rules - I have no deny rules explicitly defined.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpoz
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by

                                  f you route traffic out a gateway hard to get to your other vlan, etc..

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    marvosa last edited by marvosa

                                    Derelict already explained this with his pic, but I'll add some specifics.

                                    1. "System -> Routing -> Static Routes" should have a static route for all networks behind the Nexus with a gateway of 10.0.0.1 (Looks like this is done)
                                    2. "System -> Routing -> Gateways" should have an entry on OPT1 with a Gateway of 10.0.0.1 (Looks like this is done)
                                    3. Assuming you've enabled routing on the Nexus, remove the VLAN2 you created, re-configure e1/49 as a routed port then give it an IP of 10.0.0.1/30
                                    4. Configure a default route (not a default-gateway) on your Nexus with the next hop of 10.0.0.2

                                    That's it. I'm running this exact same setup at home. Just to reiterate what's on pic, all hosts behind the Nexus need to be using the IP configured on the SVI of each VLAN as their default gateway in order for the routing to work. You will also need to add helper addresses to each VLAN interface in order to provide DHCP behind the Nexus.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post