Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    17 Posts 5 Posters 4.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      az
      last edited by

      Hey all,

      New to the forums; first post.
      I have found a nice deal on a Dell Poweredge r710 (or an r410) both of which have two CPUs in'em and I'm excited to start messing around with'em.
      I was wondering if pfSense would be agreeable to such a server? I've seen folks put them on earlier iterations of the Poweredge servers but nothing more recent so far. I know the hardware is overkill for a small home network but it is the first thing I thought of to play with and will probably migrate later.

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        It probably will install and run no problem. Disk controllers are sometimes an issue in that sort of hardware.

        It probably is total overkill! ๐Ÿ˜‰

        What bandwidth do you need to pass?

        Are you planning to run packages?

        VPNs?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          akuma1x
          last edited by

          OMG, that's a monster... โ˜บ

          I hope you plan to run more than pfsense on that box! Have you seen the power specs on it yet?

          https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/Dell%20PowerEdge_R710_570W_Energy_Star_Data_Sheet_new.pdf

          Jeff

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            az
            last edited by

            Yeah, I've seen the power specs. But my cost isn't too high here and I'm on 100% renewable so I don't feel so bad.
            Definitely plan on running a vpn (Kind of looking at alternatives to OpenVPN since it can't utilize multiple cores) and I have a new gigabit fiber connection coming so I'm looking to push that. Going to have several VLANs to control my IoT and prevent "smart" devices from calling home, disable as much Windows as tracking as possible for my roommate, etc...
            I'm hoping to run some security cameras through as well but 'm always open to suggestions for more stuff to play with!

            AZ

            provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              What CPUs will it actually have?

              I would be tempted to run virtualised on there to make better use of the hardware.

              Not at all jealous of your 1Gbps connection. ๐Ÿ˜ข

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • A
                az
                last edited by

                Getting my own fiber splices and everything (not to rub it in or anything). It's got 2 XEON E5645 (hexa-core 2.4 Ghz). What does running virtualized get me?

                stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • provelsP
                  provels @az
                  last edited by

                  @az FWIW, I'd advise that I have run the latest 2.3 pSense on a 1GHz VIA chip with 1GB memory and a 4GB SSD up to 100Mbps speeds (the capability of the NICs), and run it virtualized on a 10-year old quad core Intel box with GB NICs at 300Mbps (max of my ISP). Nothing wrong with hobby boxes, but to run something like this with pfSense only 24/7 would be a waste. And, Lord, the NOISE! If me, maybe, I'd load it up for with Nas4Free for virtualization and storage and run pfSense in VirtualBox there.

                  Peder

                  MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                  BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                  GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • GrimsonG
                    Grimson Banned @provels
                    last edited by

                    @provels said in pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge):

                    I'd advise that I have run the latest 2.3 pSense

                    You know that 2.3 is EOL for quite some time now and has multiple security issues.

                    run pfSense in VirtualBox there.

                    Urgh, don't do that for production. Use Proxmox or ESXi, VirtualBox is only useful for testing.

                    provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @az
                      last edited by

                      @az said in pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge):

                      Getting my own fiber splices and everything (not to rub it in or anything)

                      Arggh it stings! ๐Ÿ˜‰

                      Unless you're running your own VPN concentrator or something that box will be 95% idle almost all the time. If you run virtualised you can use that processing power for something else with other VMs running along side pfSense.

                      If you are really looking for maximum OpenVPN throughput you are better off with a CPU that offers the best single thread performance you can get. As you said OpenVPN is single threaded. One way of increasing it is to run multiple OpenVPN connections and load balance them.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • provelsP
                        provels @Grimson
                        last edited by provels

                        @Grimson Yes, I run 2.4.4_2 in VM. The 2.3.5_2 is just there for backup (also an 800 MHz Via backing that up...)
                        What's "Production" for a hobby user? :)

                        Peder

                        MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                        BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                        GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GrimsonG
                          Grimson Banned @provels
                          last edited by

                          @provels said in pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge):

                          What's "Production" for a hobby user? :)

                          Your main gateway to the Internet.

                          provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            az
                            last edited by

                            Here's a question then: I know this strays a little bit away from pfSense but I'm also looking at some supermicro servers to run FreeNAS on. Would it maybe be a decent idea to run both on the same machine as VMs considering I'm running in a very small home environment?

                            GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GrimsonG
                              Grimson Banned @az
                              last edited by

                              @az said in pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge):

                              Here's a question then: I know this strays a little bit away from pfSense but I'm also looking at some supermicro servers to run FreeNAS on. Would it maybe be a decent idea to run both on the same machine as VMs considering I'm running in a very small home environment?

                              Yes, that is a pretty common use case.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • provelsP
                                provels @Grimson
                                last edited by

                                @Grimson Good enough to learn concepts on, though, I think. But, yes, ESXi would be better and also free (and likely better hardware support). At any rate, OP is still total overkill.

                                Peder

                                MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                                BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                                GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • A
                                  az
                                  last edited by

                                  I've just discovered an 8700k I have sitting around as well so I may use that and build a cheap machine out of spare parts and used stuff from Ebay for my router but I'm still really interested in this conversation.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GrimsonG
                                    Grimson Banned @provels
                                    last edited by

                                    @provels said in pfSense on dual cpu server (Dell Poweredge):

                                    @Grimson Good enough to learn concepts on, though, I think.

                                    For that you setup a virtual LAB environment, even in VirtualBox if you insist on it. For security reasons you don't use your main firewall/gateway for experimenting, or you will be demoted from hobby user to home user. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A
                                      az
                                      last edited by

                                      This has been an awesome first experience with forums. Just wanted to thank all of you for an awesome introduction into the community.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.