General Questions
-
So you enabled outbound NAT on LAN for traffic hitting the port forwards?
If you still had pf enabled you would have to that to avoid asymmetric routing. You would have seen blocked traffic in the firewall log: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/troubleshooting-blocked-log-entries-due-to-asymmetric-routing.html
It's a bit of an ugly solution though. It would be better to put those other VMs 'behind' pfSense such that they use the pfSense LAN as their gateway. That avoids the problem.
Steve
-
@thesharkgt said in General Questions:
the forms that both moderators reply are not the properly way to provide solutions.
By the way: After John already explained it in detailed steps, you still choose to ignore all we wrote. I even gave you a step by step list. Never did you come back to that with "that there, #3 did not work" but continued to configure away with other things alltogether. So yes, sorry if one can't read your mind and make you do the things, one writes time after time. That's nothing to do with not being friendly, but with giving up if you explain it multiple times and the one on the other side completely ignores all you wrote and does it another way and complains why it won't start working. Really frustrating. Perhaps that's one thing you as the questioner should also keep in mind.
I wish you the best, and (even it can sounds "weird"), thanks for all.
And for you, too!
-
I have no idea what he thinks he doing.. But it screams compete and utter freaking cluster to me..
I went above and beyond trying to help.. Just at a loss here..
Thread he linked to is pretty much a just all gibberish..
Not sure what some pings are suppose to show? Where did you ping 178.1 from? Those are some horrible lan response times for sure..
