Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Is pfSense DHCP Server NON RFC Compliant

    DHCP and DNS
    4
    6
    265
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      webdawg last edited by

      I have a Mikrotik CSS326-24G-2S+RM switch, and I had an issue where the DHCP leases were not getting through. I disabled DHCP things on the switch:

      Namely I disabled the add information option on the switch:
      ef182c16-b9ab-42c5-a834-acad44c348f5-image.png

      To get clients to get DHCP requests through the switch.

      I contacted Mikrotik, and asked them what the deal was. They focused on another issue I was having, being that the switch itself could not get a DHCP address.

      I asked them close to 11 months later if there was a fix, and this is their response:

      We have attempted to fix pfSense DHCP server issue in SwOS v2.8:
      *) make DHCP client work with RFC non compliant DHCP servers
      
      But we would recommend upgrading to the latest SwOS v2.9 which contains even more fixes regarding DHCP.
      

      I asked them again what they found and:

      The change makes SwOS DHCP Client to also accept DHCP offers with set dst. address (non broadcast one).
      

      I did not read the DHCP RFC, but does any of this make it sound like pfSense is DHCP RFC non compliant?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Gertjan
        Gertjan last edited by Gertjan

        Well ..... where to start ?

        What about : did you check 'who' it is ?

        [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@priv.brit-hotel-fumel.net]/root:  /usr/local/sbin/dhcpd -v
        Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server 4.3.6-P1
        Copyright 2004-2018 Internet Systems Consortium.
        All rights reserved
        ......
        

        So, there you have it :
        Bring " Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server " to the net and you find out who makes it.

        Changes are good that "Microtick" itself uses exactly the same software.

        Another way to resolute your issue : take that box labelled "Microtick" out of your network and you wind up having a network that will give an IP (DNS Gateway, what ever you want) to any device on planet earth.
        Problem solved.

        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum.

        W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          webdawg @Gertjan last edited by

          @Gertjan Right, and that is what I thought.

          I just noticed that they wrote that, and I know they are not giving me the right answer.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpoz
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by

            Is that switch the ones that has ANY for all vlans? Dude save yourself a whole lot of pain and just go get real switch...

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              webdawg last edited by

              Hey Guys,

              With all respect, I asked a question, and it was answered. All I want to know is if MikroTik support was bullsh*ting me. They are, and I figured this. Not in my wildest dreams would I think that (considering the software set that pfSense uses), that pfSense would not have an RFC complaint DHCP server, but I wanted to ask the experts.

              I have no issue, but I wanted to confirm what I was hearing was not the truth.

              Over the last two years MikroTik has been very good to me, and I challenge you to find a switch with 10gb SFP+ at the price-point these things come in at.

              For the record, VLANing works 100%, and they have quite a few features I like. They are missing some things that I would use in different scenerious, but for what they are, I am good.

              The switch that I am using is a CSS varient, so limited control of just the switch, but they sell CRS versions that are pretty heavy handed, and you can switch to the RouterOS, and SwitchOS.

              I wish they would opensource both, I think it would be a win for all.

              Like I said though, I can't beat the SFP+ stuff, and I mainly use these in places where I need that 10gbit run. I just grabbed their CRS305-1G-4S+IN 4x SFP+ switch for the 10gbit stuff too.

              Amazon lists after market SFP+ adapters too that work great too: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LYW5F11/

              I do not have a heavy handed budget for this stuff, and if I did, I would grab something that may be a bit better, but so far so good.

              KOM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KOM
                KOM @webdawg last edited by

                @webdawg said in Is pfSense DHCP Server NON RFC Compliant:

                Over the last two years MikroTik has been very good to me

                For what it's worth, I also use Mikrotik at home, and our ISP uses them for their business customers. At my company, I have pfSense connecting my LAN to my ISP's Mikrotik. While I've been satisfied with the hardware and RouterOS, I'm a little disappointed that their support is not being straight-forward with you.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post