• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Problem with NTP; different clients give different results.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
ntpd
16 Posts 4 Posters 4.2k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V
    vidarlo
    last edited by vidarlo Aug 28, 2019, 11:44 AM Aug 28, 2019, 11:43 AM

    I'm aware of the difference. And yes, it was synchronized and had a valid time.

    The reach field shows 377 for all selected peers on the server. ntptime also shows sync:

    $ ntptime
      ntp_gettime() returns code 0 (OK)
      time e110e761.b408b760  Wed, Aug 28 2019 11:43:29.703, (.703258928),
      maximum error 181125 us, estimated error 3512 us, TAI offset 0
    ntp_adjtime() returns code 0 (OK)
      modes 0x0 (),
      offset -920.327 us, frequency 3.846 ppm, interval 4 s,
      maximum error 181125 us, estimated error 3512 us,
      status 0x2001 (PLL,NANO),
      time constant 7, precision 1.000 us, tolerance 496 ppm,
      pps frequency 4.251 ppm, stability 0.000 ppm, jitter 0.000 us,
      intervals 0, jitter exceeded 0, stability exceeded 0, errors 0.
    
    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by johnpoz Aug 28, 2019, 12:52 PM Aug 28, 2019, 12:52 PM

      Well my "guess" then it has to do with the client time being so far off that the ntp server returns back that is not going to be a valid source - just a guess.

      Put a different client on this lan, and test syncing to the ntp.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kiokoman LAYER 8
        last edited by kiokoman Aug 28, 2019, 1:15 PM Aug 28, 2019, 1:08 PM

        the time is too far off
        syncing it would cause issues with software timers, strange gaps in log files etc.
        launching ntpdate with this flag

        -b     Force  the  time  to  be stepped using the settimeofday() system call, rather than slewed (default) using the adjtime() system call. This option should be used when called from a
                     startup file at boot time.
        

        ntpd have this flag

        -g, --panicgate
                     Allow the first adjustment to be Big.  This option may appear an unlimited number of times.
        
                     Normally, ntpd exits with a message to the system log if the offset exceeds the panic threshold, which is 1000 s by default. This option allows the time to be set  to  any  value
                     without  restriction;  however,  this can happen only once. If the threshold is exceeded after that, ntpd will exit with a message to the system log. This option can be used with
                     the -q and -x options.  See the tinker configuration file directive for other options.
        

        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by Aug 28, 2019, 1:10 PM

          I don't know if his client supports using ntpdate like that?

          But I know for sure that such a difference, 17 years not going to make for good stuff..

          But his overall question - which I don't have the answer to is why the server responds back with no stratum.

          I would test from a client also on this same lan to the same IP, etc. and what does it show back..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kiokoman LAYER 8
            last edited by Aug 28, 2019, 1:14 PM

            i think it's just a placeholder it see the gap, refuse to sync and not accepting any other information

            ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
            Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
            we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
            Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by Aug 28, 2019, 1:21 PM

              Could well be... He needs to get his time on his client closer and see what happens then with the ntp sync would be my suggestion.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              V 1 Reply Last reply Aug 29, 2019, 6:39 AM Reply Quote 0
              • J
                JKnott @johnpoz
                last edited by JKnott Aug 28, 2019, 2:19 PM Aug 28, 2019, 2:11 PM

                @johnpoz said in Problem with NTP; different clients give different results.:

                your s7 client says the reference time is year 2036.. Prob going to be some issues there ;)

                Actually, that's intentional, for security.

                For example, here's a capture I just made, between my Linux computer and pfSense:
                Client
                Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, client)
                Flags: 0x23, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 4, Mode: client
                Peer Clock Stratum: unspecified or invalid (0)
                Peer Polling Interval: 6 (64 sec)
                Peer Clock Precision: 4294967296.000000 sec
                Root Delay: 0 seconds
                Root Dispersion: 0 seconds
                Reference ID: NULL
                Reference Timestamp: Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
                Origin Timestamp: Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
                Receive Timestamp: Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
                Transmit Timestamp: Dec 13, 2070 20:36:43.881077365 UTC

                Server
                Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, server)
                Flags: 0x24, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 4, Mode: server
                Peer Clock Stratum: secondary reference (3)
                Peer Polling Interval: 6 (64 sec)
                Peer Clock Precision: 0.000002 sec
                Root Delay: 0.018310546875 seconds
                Root Dispersion: 0.0140380859375 seconds
                Reference ID: 132.246.11.238
                Reference Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 14:14:36.965628826 UTC
                Origin Timestamp: Dec 13, 2070 20:36:43.881077365 UTC
                Receive Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 14:14:51.403424458 UTC
                Transmit Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 14:14:51.403455935 UTC

                And from the pfSense WAN side last week:

                Client
                Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, client)
                Flags: 0x23, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 4, Mode: client
                Peer Clock Stratum: secondary reference (3)
                Peer Polling Interval: 9 (512 sec)
                Peer Clock Precision: 0.000002 sec
                Root Delay: 0.017425537109375 seconds
                Root Dispersion: 0.0239715576171875 seconds
                Reference ID: 132.246.11.238
                Reference Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:21:22.937971724 UTC
                Origin Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:21:22.928525035 UTC
                Receive Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:21:22.937971724 UTC
                Transmit Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:30:02.932939781 UTC

                Server
                User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 123, Dst Port: 44719
                Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, server)
                Flags: 0x24, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 4, Mode: server
                Peer Clock Stratum: secondary reference (2)
                Peer Polling Interval: 9 (512 sec)
                Peer Clock Precision: 0.000000 sec
                Root Delay: 9.1552734375e-05 seconds
                Root Dispersion: 0.00335693359375 seconds
                Reference ID: 209.87.233.52
                Reference Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:29:26.706151139 UTC
                Origin Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:31:44.921310040 UTC
                Receive Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:31:44.942857706 UTC
                Transmit Timestamp: Aug 20, 2019 16:31:44.942889384 UTC

                PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                UniFi AC-Lite access point

                I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  JKnott
                  last edited by Aug 28, 2019, 3:37 PM

                  I just noticed a difference between Linux and Windows 10. Windows 10 uses NTP 3, but Linux NTP 4. Also, there are no "funny" values in the server packet and in the client packet, both the origin and transmit timestamps are for the current time.

                  Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 3, client)
                  Flags: 0xdb, Leap Indicator: unknown (clock unsynchronized), Version number: NTP Version 3, Mode: client
                  Peer Clock Stratum: unspecified or invalid (0)
                  Peer Polling Interval: 10 (1024 sec)
                  Peer Clock Precision: 0.000000 sec
                  Root Delay: 0.020263671875 seconds
                  Root Dispersion: 8.97770690917969 seconds
                  Reference ID: NULL
                  Reference Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:28:47.072085699 UTC
                  Origin Timestamp: Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
                  Receive Timestamp: Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
                  Transmit Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:30:59.713089499 UTC

                  Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 3, server)
                  Flags: 0x1c, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 3, Mode: server
                  Peer Clock Stratum: secondary reference (3)
                  Peer Polling Interval: 10 (1024 sec)
                  Peer Clock Precision: 0.000002 sec
                  Root Delay: 0.0184326171875 seconds
                  Root Dispersion: 0.0333404541015625 seconds
                  Reference ID: 132.246.11.238
                  Reference Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:07:13.948361143 UTC
                  Origin Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:30:59.713089499 UTC
                  Receive Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:30:59.902306393 UTC
                  Transmit Timestamp: Aug 28, 2019 15:30:59.902336671 UTC

                  PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                  i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                  UniFi AC-Lite access point

                  I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vidarlo @johnpoz
                    last edited by Aug 29, 2019, 6:39 AM

                    @johnpoz

                    The NTP client syncs fine to a different NTP server. And time on the NTP client is not 2036; it's within minutes of NTP time. Furthermore, it's an embedded client, probably stateless (think sNTP).

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by Aug 29, 2019, 9:13 AM

                      Well then your not ttalking to pfsense is the only thing I can think of dude.. did you do my test of trying to sync a different client to that same IP your using..

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      16 out of 16
                      • First post
                        16/16
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received