Limit bandwidth per user or Share bandwidth evenly?
-
I was reading through the docs over at opnsense and came across how to setup traffic shaping
https://wiki.opnsense.org/manual/how-tos/shaper.htmlLimit bandwidth per user
Instructions for limiting bandwidth per user so that each user will recieve a maximum of say 5Mbps
and
Share bandwidth evenly
Instructions for sharing the set bandwidth evenly between all users.
Can any of theese two be setup in pfsense and if so, how?
-
You do it the exact same way: limiters.
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/book/trafficshaper/limiters.html
-
That link tells me how limiters work, however no instructions for either of the two in my previous post.
So over to the opnsense link again. the instructions for "Limit bandwidth per user" is as follows:
Step 1 - Create Upload and Download Pipes
Create Pipe For Download
enabled: Checked
bandwidth: 5Mbps
mask: destination
description: PipeDown-5MbpsStep 2 - Create Rules
sequence: 21
interface: WAN
proto: ip
source: any
src-port: any
destination: 192.168.1.0/24
dst-port: any
target: PipeDown-5Mbps
description: ShapeDownloadGood instructions by opnsense here so lets translate this over to pfsense.
- should mask be "destination" for download and "source" for upload?
- sequence: 21 where do i put this or is it even needed?
- proto: ip ip does not exist under protocol in pfsense so what to choose instead?
-
I'm not really interested in looking at or translating OpnSense documentation. If you don't understand the docs, you can search for how to do it or perhaps someone else can explain it all. I don't use limiters myself.
Here is a good link that shows various scenarios about limiters and pfSense:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/3e67dk/flexible_vs_fixed_limiters_troubleshooting_with/
-
What what possible reason are you asking about this here?
You do understand that is not pfsense right.. If you have questions on how to use that software or their documentation you should ask on their forums.
-
-
@KOM Thanks for the reddit link very informative.
-
best explication ever
https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/3e67dk/flexible_vs_fixed_limiters_troubleshooting_with/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
-
@Jimbohello I am having issues with flexible limiter and multiple gateway groups, i tried configuring it using floating rules, do you know someone who can help??
-
in floating rule !
in/out direction
you will have to test the in/direction on top option and specify the wan group in the field gateway
but before doing so ! you should just test your setting in the lan/rule first !!
then after play arround in the floating rules
-
@Jimbohello I should have been bit clear, i have 3 connections
- 100MBPS
- 40MBPS
- 8MBPS.
My gateway groups are
- 100MBPS_40MBPS_8MBPS
- 100MBPS_8MBPS_40MBPS
- 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS
In Floating rules, i am just trying to match the IN direction first
Action: Match
Interface: Lan
Direction: In
Address Family: IPv4
Protocol: Any
Source: LAN Net
Destination: (Inverse/Not) LAN Net
Gateway: 100MBPS_40MBPS_8MBPS
In pipe: Upload_100MBPS_Queue
Out pipe: Download_100MBPS_QueueSimilar floating rule for 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS with the following changes only
Gateway: 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS
In pipe: Upload_40MBPS_Queue
Out pipe: Download_40MBPS_QueueNow i have two questions
- Is the floating rule above defined correctly?
- I have read somewhere that for IN/OUT direction we should give IN/OUT queues separately, but defining just an OUT queue for an OUT direction floating rule gives this error "A queue must be selected for the In direction before selecting one for Out too."
- When we have a gateway group with different speeds of each WAN, how can we define fixed pipes.
Thanks for your help.
Anand -
@anand_phulwani
did you follw this simple tutorialhttps://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/3e67dk/flexible_vs_fixed_limiters_troubleshooting_with/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
-
are you using em driver ??
create file
/boot/loader.conf.local - final - best result ever !
if_em_load="YES"
cc_htcp_load="YES"
hw.em.eee_setting="0"
hw.em.rx_process_limit="-1"
hw.em.txd="2048"
hw.em.rxd="2048"
net.link.ifqmaxlen="4096"the create like my setup
-
like my setup
limiter config Download
Codel
FQ_codel
queue lenght 100
ecn enablelimiter Queue Download
Mask / Destination Adresse /32
Codellimiter config Upload
Codel
FQ_codel
queue lenght 100
ecn enablelimiter Queue Upload
Mask / Source Adresse /32
Codellimiter on lan rules
in= upload-queue
out=download-queueif you wan't floating just make the same in floating instead of lan rules but you will have to set the direction to out
that's the best i can do
floating-1.png change black spot with Lan Net
floating-2.png change black spot with Desired Gateway -
@Jimbohello
I have made the following for sharing bandwidth evenly- Upload Limiter
- Upload Queue
- Download Limiter
- Download Queue
- Floating Rule
but it still isn't working, i am using the traffic graphs / online web speedcheck to check for equal division, but it isn't happening.
Thanks again for so much help, you are the first person on the forum who is at least willing to discuss over it.
Thanks again,
Anand - Upload Limiter
-
@anand_phulwani
replace the scheduler for fd_codel instead of worst-caseeverything else seem perfecto
but this is for a max limit and not a per/user scenario.
you probably have to reset all state or reboot
if is still not working
try in lan first not floating
-
@anand_phulwani
as i understand this is a flexible limit base on per/user/max-limit-all
so if 6 pc download silmutanous pfsense should divise the max of 100M for these 6 pcif your looking to get a fix limit/per/user
you should check out de tuturial 1er scenario 'FIXED limit'ciao
BUT i MAY be Wrong ! ain't god ! :)
-
@Jimbohello said in Limit bandwidth per user or Share bandwidth evenly?:
so if 6 pc download silmutanous pfsense should divise the max of 100M for these 6 pc
This is exactly what i am looking for 100M divided equally between active clients.
replace the scheduler for fd_codel instead of worst-case
Done
you probably have to reset all state or reboot
I always reboot first to check.
-
@Jimbohello
I changed it to FQ_Codel, there wasn't any option of FD_Codel. -
sorry my mistake
now
im’ not sure if division would be equal. this will only allow a saruration to 100m and reduce bandwich to other pc if a added pc come into games. etc
you can see if limiter work in limiter info or staus