sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak

bruor

I'm hoping someone here might be able to help me sort out why unbound on pfsense isn't fond of this python module?

On previous versions of pfsense I've used a custom install of BIND and domain overrides to do AAAA filtering for specific domains (youtube) that don't work great over my ISP's (Start.ca) 6RD tunnel, or for IPv6 enabled networks where I want to make use of IP whitelisting for Google's SMTP-relay (which doesn't allow whitelisting entire IPv6 ranges. But on version 2.4.5 that is no longer an option. johnpoz recommended switching to an unbound python module here to handle that type of filtration: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/151745/bind-filter-aaaa/8

However, I've noticed that when enabled, unbound will steadily consume all memory on the firewall until it becomes unresponsive. If I disable the python module function memory utilization is stable.

here's a graph where you can clearly see the moment I turned it on (11:46), and back off again.

Contents of python module file:

def init_standard(id, cfg):
    return True

def deinit(id):
    return True

def inform_super(id, qstate, superqstate, qdata):
    return True

domains = [
    "smtp-relay.gmail.com.",
    "youtube.com.",
    "googlevideo.com.",
    "ytimg.com.",
#    "netflix.com.",
#    "netflix.net.",
#    "nflxext.com.",
#    "nflximg.net.",
#    "nflxvideo.net.",
#    "nflxso.net.",
]

def operate(id, event, qstate, qdata):
    if event == MODULE_EVENT_NEW or event == MODULE_EVENT_PASS:
        if qstate.qinfo.qtype != RR_TYPE_AAAA:
            qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_WAIT_MODULE
            return True

        for domain in domains:
            if qstate.qinfo.qname_str == domain or qstate.qinfo.qname_str.endswith("." + domain):
                msg = DNSMessage(qstate.qinfo.qname_str, RR_TYPE_A, RR_CLASS_IN, PKT_QR | PKT_RA | PKT_AA)
                if not msg.set_return_msg(qstate):
                    qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_ERROR
                    return True
                # We don't need validation, result is valid
                qstate.return_msg.rep.security = 2
                qstate.return_rcode = RCODE_NOERROR
                qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_FINISHED
                log_info("no-aaaa: blocking AAAA request for %s" % qstate.qinfo.qname_str)
                return True
        qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_WAIT_MODULE
        return True

    if event == MODULE_EVENT_MODDONE:
        qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_FINISHED
        return True

    qstate.ext_state[id] = MODULE_ERROR
    return True

log_info("pythonmod: script loaded")

I have just noticed that there is an unbound update available, I've applied it via SSH, will re-test on that version and post back here with results.

Gertjan

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/154111/prevent-unbound-resolving-ipv6-for-one-domain/4
I'm using the very same python mod for a long time now.

bruor

Still present after updating unbound. Turned on the no-aaaa module last night around 10pm and left it overnight, today unbound was using up way more ram than it should be.

I just checked in on an SG-3100 and it seems to have the same issue, although way less pronounced because it's got 4x the RAM to consume. Ram usage has been slowly increasing over the last few months but the only thing we filter with that script is smtp-relay.gmail.com

I will also try this on a freshly deployed sg-1100 to see if the issue happens there.

bruor

@Gertjan Mind posting your unbound config? Also, are you running on an SG-1100 also?

##
# Server configuration
##
server:

chroot: /var/unbound
username: "unbound"
directory: "/var/unbound"
pidfile: "/var/run/unbound.pid"
use-syslog: yes
port: 53
verbosity: 1
hide-identity: yes
hide-version: yes
harden-glue: yes
do-ip4: yes
do-ip6: yes
do-udp: yes
do-tcp: yes
do-daemonize: yes
module-config: "python validator iterator"
unwanted-reply-threshold: 0
num-queries-per-thread: 512
jostle-timeout: 200
infra-host-ttl: 900
infra-cache-numhosts: 10000
outgoing-num-tcp: 10
incoming-num-tcp: 10
edns-buffer-size: 4096
cache-max-ttl: 86400
cache-min-ttl: 0
harden-dnssec-stripped: yes
msg-cache-size: 4m
rrset-cache-size: 8m

num-threads: 2
msg-cache-slabs: 2
rrset-cache-slabs: 2
infra-cache-slabs: 2
key-cache-slabs: 2
outgoing-range: 4096
#so-rcvbuf: 4m
auto-trust-anchor-file: /var/unbound/root.key
prefetch: no
prefetch-key: yes
use-caps-for-id: no
serve-expired: no
# Statistics
# Unbound Statistics
statistics-interval: 0
extended-statistics: yes
statistics-cumulative: yes

# TLS Configuration
tls-cert-bundle: "/etc/ssl/cert.pem"

# Interface IP(s) to bind to
interface-automatic: yes
interface: 0.0.0.0
interface: ::0

# Outgoing interfaces to be used
outgoing-interface: _removed_
outgoing-interface: _removed_
outgoing-interface: _removed_
outgoing-interface: _removed_

# DNS Rebinding
# For DNS Rebinding prevention
private-address: 127.0.0.0/8
private-address: 10.0.0.0/8
private-address: ::ffff:a00:0/104
private-address: 172.16.0.0/12
private-address: ::ffff:ac10:0/108
private-address: 169.254.0.0/16
private-address: ::ffff:a9fe:0/112
private-address: 192.168.0.0/16
private-address: ::ffff:c0a8:0/112
private-address: fd00::/8
private-address: fe80::/10


# Access lists
include: /var/unbound/access_lists.conf

# Static host entries
include: /var/unbound/host_entries.conf

# dhcp lease entries
include: /var/unbound/dhcpleases_entries.conf



# Domain overrides
include: /var/unbound/domainoverrides.conf
# Forwarding
forward-zone:
        name: "."
        forward-addr: 8.8.8.8
        forward-addr: 8.8.4.4
        forward-addr: 2001:4860:4860::8888
        forward-addr: 2001:4860:4860::8844


# Unbound custom options
server: include: /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.*conf
local-data: "_vlmcs._tcp.domain.com 3600 IN SRV 10 0 1688 pfsense.domain.com"

###
# Remote Control Config
###
include: /var/unbound/remotecontrol.conf

# Python Module
python:
python-script: no-aaaa.py

bruor

I looked at this from the beginning and it appears that my script was owned by root:unbound, I've changed that to unbound:unbound, monitoring to see if it makes any difference.

bruor

I turned off DHCP leases being registered at the same time, preliminary results look good here. I wonder if the reloads caused by DHCP renewals is the actual cause of the issue.... Turning it back on to see.

bruor

So this appears to be a memory leak that happens when you use a python module and have "register DHCP leases in DNS resolver" enabled.

Gertjan

@bruor said in sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak:

"register DHCP leases in DNS resolver"

has this nice habit of restarting the Resolver on every new lease on a LAN.
The cache get's ditched while doing so.
When you use a package like pfBlockerNG with a lot of feeds, the restart will take (a lot of) time, during which no DNS isn't working : another not so nice side effect.
You have to have special reasons to have "register DHCP leases in DNS resolver" activated (checked).

Anyway.
I'll activate 'check' mine and see what happens with the memory.

bruor

@Gertjan here I have about 40 devices on the network and it it takes about a day for unbound to consume 400ish MB of RAM.

My best guess is that the restart of unbound is just a reload and some stuff stays resident in mom, and gets launched again. If I do a full restart of the unbound service it'll free up the ram it's hogging and go back to normal.

In order to diagnose this I actually disabled pfblocker-ng and the issue still happened.

Gertjan

@bruor said in sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak:

My best guess is that the restart of unbound is just a reload and some stuff stays resident in mom, and gets launched again.

The thing is, it's worse... Dono ... depends which issue we're talking about.
When unbound "reloads", the process is stopped, all memory is freed. This in an "OS" thing, not an unbound thing.
Then, it starts again ...

This repeatability process re starting can not leak memory. If it would, millions of FreeBSD installs would fault after several minutes ...
But .... unbound instantiates Python. and I presume (^^) that, when unbound stops, Python also 'stops' == freeing its used memory and resources.

bruor

I agree, but I believe the DHCP leases cause an unbound reload and not a full restart. I have a feeling that reload doesn't clean up the python process but launches another. Full restart however, does. I think I could figure out how to just script 20x reloads for unbound back to back to see if this is the case.

Gertjan

@bruor said in sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak:

I agree, but I believe the DHCP leases cause an unbound reload and not a full restart

A boatload of forum threads already handle that questions over the last two, three years.
A couple of us actually looked at the source code of unbound. It's a 'free' project anyway, so : why would you choose to believe if you can see the thing in front of you : Unbound, when it receives a SIGHUP signal, stops. It will exit. It does not implement a something that looks like a "reload the config an go".

I activated (checked) " DHCP Registration Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver" - I have about 40 LAN devices ** and a another LAN network for visitors/clients/BYOD devices.

My pfSense Memory usage is public info : https://www.test-domaine.fr/munin/brit-hotel-fumel.net/pfsense.brit-hotel-fumel.net/memory.html
Active memory is actually .. lowering. W'll see what happens after some days.

bruor

Thanks for trying to reproduce on your end.

When looking at https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?unbound.conf it indicates that a HUP is handled as a config reload and is different than a full restart. Mentioned in the interface and username sections

bruor

Can you have a look at your unbound process and see if it is consuming more ram than expected? Based on your graphs it's definitely not impacting your setup as radically as it did mine at home.

Gertjan

@bruor said in sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak:

Thanks for trying to reproduce on your end.

When looking at https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?unbound.conf it indicates that a HUP is handled as a config reload and is different than a full restart. Mentioned in the interface and username sections

Doc is nice.
But pure BS - or at least the interpretation is wrong.
The nice thing of Open Software is : the real manual is the code. You can read it yourself.
Again : HUP = dump process and start over. It's just a couple of lines of Code.

https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/blob/68eab24db7b3ecbd9c13feeaa4e3f4e4aea9c08a/daemon/unbound.c
You find the main() - the rundeamon() and here https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/blob/334498d9b94f080cd29fa5e1d3d426b9d1edfe6b/daemon/worker.c you see how, in a worker thread, the signals are handled.

New seems : a HUP (SIGHUP) keeps the interfaces 'as is , and reloads the rest. That not ok for pfSEnse, where interfaces can come and go : cables are unplugged, OpenVPN instances are started or stopped, etc.

But, hey, who cares : see for yourself the ancient way : dump the resolver.log real time in an console/SSH window.
In another console/SSH, stop start / restart / reload / whatever your unbound process.
The log times in seconds will give you all the details.

For me : stop + restart or reload or restart = identical.
To have it sweat a little bit, I bloated my pfBlockerNG-devel more then usual. More then a one GB of memory was being used.

@bruor said in sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak:

Can you have a look at your unbound process and see if it is consuming more ram than expected? Based on your graphs it's definitely not impacting your setup as radically as it did mine at home.

I had pfBlockerNG-devel shut down for a day or two. It needed a day of.

bruor

Thanks, perhaps this is limited to the sg-1100 in some way. Opened a redmine to see if they can reproduce at their end

bruor

pfblocker has made a note about python modules being incompatible with DHCP lease registration updates in unbound needed a full restart vs sighup.

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/158592/pfblockerng-devel-v3-0-0-no-longer-bound-by-unbound/2

This led me to another search which seems to indicate that this is a long-standing issue.
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5413

sg-1100 2.4.5 unbound python module + DHCP lease DNS registration memory leak

Products

Services

Support

News

Resources

Company

Our Mission

Subscribe to our Newsletter