Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-3100 pfSense v2.4.4-p3 : Many sudden issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    17 Posts 5 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      newberger
      last edited by

      Hi - as stated, I have an SG-3100, running v2.4.4-p3 and it's been stable, with no configuration changes for several months.

      Today, I was having some sites have very slow DNS resolving and then some that wouldn't connect at all. I went to the pfSense GUI, which took a long time to open and was going to check the logs. The logs are missing with the message "No logs to Display". I rebooted, same error. I went to logs/settings and "reset log files", still no logs, although at one point, the error "vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed" was displayed many times.

      Other "new" issues: on the dashboard, message "unable to check for updates", under my auto config backups, none are listed and I have them auto-saved every 24 hours.

      Any assistance would be appreciated! Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DaddyGoD
        DaddyGo
        last edited by

        we are already here:
        https://forum.netgate.com/topic/154337/pfsense-2-4-5-release-p1-now-available/57

        this is not personalization, but it really is what many use ☺

        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          newberger
          last edited by

          @DaddyGo said in SG-3100 pfSense v2.4.4-p3 : Many sudden issues:

          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/154337/pfsense-2-4-5-release-p1-now-available/57

          Thanks for the reply. Yes, I am aware of the release of 2.4.5, but haven't had time to go through the upgrade process.

          I can upgrade, but I would like to know why my current system has become unstable and resolve any issue - unless the issue is 2.4.4-p3, which seems unlikely.

          NollipfSenseN DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • NollipfSenseN
            NollipfSense @newberger
            last edited by

            @newberger said in SG-3100 pfSense v2.4.4-p3 : Many sudden issues:

            I would like to know why my current system has become unstable and resolve any issue - unless the issue is 2.4.4-p3, which seems unlikely.

            The need or needing to upgrade ... why hesitates!

            pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
            pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DaddyGoD
              DaddyGo @newberger
              last edited by

              @newberger

              Hi,

              I love your style, realy.....
              who knows, but it may be precisely, because you don’t update (long ago)

              there are two kinds of people (my friend) who dares and who does not dare
              but this makes no sense in informatics....

              we can talk about what we use, so we’re already here: 2.4.5-p1

              these are not arrogant speeches, that is a fact and observe the other users as well
              would you be worried, if it was a Windows update, probably not,
              do the same with PfSense

              Cats bury it so they can't see it!
              (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                SteveITS Galactic Empire
                last edited by

                Is your disk full?
                If DNS isn't working then the GUI, especially the dashboard, is slow as it waits until DNS timeouts happen.

                Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                DaddyGoD N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DaddyGoD
                  DaddyGo @SteveITS
                  last edited by DaddyGo

                  @teamits

                  I don’t think you need to encourage a colleague to debug an outdated system

                  we will never get out of the happy squirrel wheel, unless we move forward to the current version 2.4.5 -p1

                  +++++what’s the point of talking about - which no longer exists

                  Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                  (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    newberger @SteveITS
                    last edited by

                    @teamits hi - thanks for the reply. No, the disk is showing 12% usage.

                    DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      SteveITS Galactic Empire
                      last edited by

                      I get your point but if his disk is full or corrupted it's unlikely upgrading will help or work.

                      We didn't upgrade any of our 2.4.4 to 2.4.5 because of the pf issue, and I'm waiting to see if 2.4.5p1's package installation issues get resolved. Old versions shouldn't just stop working.

                      Also @newberger if DNS isn't working then updates won't work either.

                      Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                      When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                      Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                      DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DaddyGoD
                        DaddyGo @newberger
                        last edited by

                        @newberger

                        there are many changes since your current version 2.4.4
                        please update and don't be afraid
                        until then, it is pointless to talk about this, as your system will fundamentally change

                        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DaddyGoD
                          DaddyGo @SteveITS
                          last edited by

                          @teamits

                          become a security player and you will never get ahead ☺

                          it’s a community stuff and we help with the development, with our stupid texts

                          Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                          (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Cool_CoronaC
                            Cool_Corona
                            last edited by

                            For what its worth....

                            IMHO one cant make a user upgrade anytime a new release is out.

                            Its like making all windows servers update the version when a new version is released.

                            Making the previous versions unusable and unpatched.

                            A pfsense 2.2.6 does way better performance wise with IDS/IPS like snort/suricata.

                            I understand why people prefer a stable running system that performs well compared to what we have been through with the 2.4.5 release until they upgraded to p1.

                            On a 16 core system i currently push 300/300mbit/s on 2.4.5p1.

                            Same system with 2.2.6 and same rules in IDS, I push 910/945mbit/s.

                            So by forcing an update on people instead of making the eco system able to run several versions of pfsense, you are more or less forcing a potential error on everybody which is not good. To say the least....

                            DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              SteveITS Galactic Empire
                              last edited by

                              Note I haven't said not to upgrade. By contrast the OP has said he/she gets "unable to check for updates." So is your suggestion to contact Netgate to get a copy of a current 3100 installer image, hook up a console cable, format, install, and restore config from backup (if possible, that was noted as a problem also)?

                              Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                              When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                              Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • N
                                newberger
                                last edited by

                                Thanks for the replies. I rebooted all of my hardware, modem, switch, SG-3100 and the problem is resolved. I can see my logs, my saved configurations, and the upgrade is shown as available. I've had this setup for 2 1/2 years and never had an issue with the modem/SG-3100 like that.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DaddyGoD
                                  DaddyGo @Cool_Corona
                                  last edited by DaddyGo

                                  @Cool_Corona

                                  in an older post you said that you were brand new here - ok ✋
                                  for example, you didn't know who BBcan177 and what is his role in pfSense
                                  I mean, you want to know more, but you have to learn first

                                  read through the forum, you will see who the "great old people" are here.....
                                  notice how many recommend running old versions.....(nobody)

                                  those who know pfSense from the inside - outside, they perform the update first

                                  @Cool_Corona "Its like making all windows servers update the version when a new version is released."

                                  No, no, no / for windows you have no choice, because you can only delay the update and if you don't do it in time, it could be a suicide!

                                  it's a communiti version (pfSense) and not windows (profit oriented) so you get help here for free, but you also have to give it to the community......!!!

                                  PS:

                                  @Cool_Corona "On a 16 core system i currently push 300/300mbit/s on 2.4.5p1.
                                  Same system with 2.2.6 and same rules in IDS, I push 910/945mbit/s."
                                  (16 cores(???), make no sense on pfSense, just a force pointing show)

                                  otherwise there can be no such speed difference between versions, ergo you are doing something wrong

                                  Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                  (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Cool_CoronaC
                                    Cool_Corona
                                    last edited by

                                    Tell me why 16 cores doesnt make sense on a 10gbit connection when using IDS/IPS?

                                    DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DaddyGoD
                                      DaddyGo @Cool_Corona
                                      last edited by

                                      @Cool_Corona

                                      for me this cannot be a case of debate ☺
                                      these are unreasonable things at SOHO

                                      surely there is also a nuclear power plant in the garage to serve this muscular firewall + router unit

                                      you can’t hunt sparrows with a cannon, but it’s your decision
                                      I look at these things with a professional eye and you only experiment with pfSense

                                      it has been my job for a long time and I think you're dealing with it as a hobby
                                      this is not a problem anyway, but like I said - we are different

                                      Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                      (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.