Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Suricata Interface Rules on Bridged Interfaces

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    2 Posts 2 Posters 754 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C Offline
      chumunga
      last edited by

      I was curious, since i've setup a bridge for two interfaces, and called it VirSWPort with Eth2 and Eth3, when I create a rule for VirSWPort, do I still need to do it for each individual port namely eth2 and eth3 or is it implied that whatever rule I put on virswport, is applied to eth2 & 3?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S Offline
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Probably depends how you have Suricata configured.

        Usually the only reason you run it on the internal interface is to have visibility on the internal IPs in which case running it on the bridge would give you that.

        If you're running in-line mode you probably need to use the real interfaces.

        If you're running blocking mode the bridge filtering probably determines where it needs to be run.

        It's not a common deployment so I would recommend running some tests to see what works for you.

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.