Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5

JKnott

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

@jknott it is not cable anymore, now it is VDSL.

The same still applies. Do you really need gateway mode for the phone service?

Bob.Dig

@jknott I would have to buy yet another device (probably another router) to get the fax machine going.

JKnott

@daddygo said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

Stay the running version 2.4.5-p1, until you get a green light,..... and test in a VM environment with 2.5.0 ... PLS

It's not a major problem. I don't often need a VPN to reach my home network, when I'm already at home. However, it is nice to be able to ensure it's working before I need to use it from elsewhere. With COVID, that's not happening very often. I can still test by tethering to my phone.

JKnott

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

@jknott I would have to buy yet another device (probably another router) to get the fax machine going.

I'm having trouble understanding this. Is your phone on the same modem as your Internet connection? If so, can it not provide the phone service when in bridge mode, as mine does?

BTW, faxes are obsolete. I haven't sent one in years.

DaddyGo

@jknott said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

BTW, faxes are obsolete. I haven't sent one in years.

Like @me .....

do you know what I am using now?

from "untrusted" ISP zone - GPON 1/1 Gig + 2 IPS IP + VOIP + ISP NAT for VOIP + CCTV

bridge mode for pfSensen on port 4 (Technicolor router ISP)

pure GPON ISP IP.... 1000 / 1000 with very serious quality:

Bob.Dig

@jknott Again, don't say that, I have voted by fax in the last us elections.
And no, it has no bridge mode. I haven't see any device for VDSL which could be a bridge and has a jack for a phone and some stuff is different here.

DaddyGo

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

Again, don't say that, I have voted by fax in the last us elections.

it means nothing and / or stupidity
politics eats your soul, pls. don't deal with it

Bob.Dig

@daddygo DONT VOTE EAT TRASH DO DRUGS GET CASH
Don't take it too serious I guess.

DaddyGo

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

Don't take it too serious I guess

I just love you, because dare you are communicative, hello next time.........

yon 0

Where can I learn the ipv6 nat tutorial? Our university’s ipv6 network ppoe cannot get ipv6 prefixes. maybe i have to use ipv6 nat for LAN.

Bob.Dig

@yon-0 If you have an IPv6 address on the WAN-Interface, then sure, go for it.

yon 0

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

@yon-0 If you have an IPv6 address on the WAN-Interface, then sure, go for it.

yes, WAN show has an ipv6 address with /64, i use WAN DHCP6 and LAN track interface, LAN can't get ipv6.

how config ipv6 nat in pfsense 2.5 or 2.6?

Bob.Dig

@yon-0 Where you got 2.6 from?

JKnott

@yon-0 said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

Our university’s ipv6 network ppoe cannot get ipv6 prefixes. maybe i have to use ipv6 nat for LAN.

How many prefixes do you need? Pfsense allows multiple users to share a single prefix. If you can't fit all the users in a /64, you're doing something wrong.

yon 0

@bob-dig said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

@yon-0 Where you got 2.6 from?

pfsense.org site upgrade.

2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
built on Sun Mar 07 01:03:53 EST 2021
FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE

Bob.Dig

@yon-0 said in Thank you for the IPv6 NAT capabilities in 2.5:

how config ipv6 nat in pfsense 2.5

You do it exactly as with IPv4 (use ULAs "instead" of private IPs and don't forget outbound NAT).