Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Strange behaviour, NAT worked for 2 years, not anymore

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    9 Posts 4 Posters 745 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      Modesty
      last edited by

      Hi

      I made this rule in 2019, and has worked until now. Today I checked with actual IP (not dyndns) and port is not open. Any Ideas?

      41401866-63d6-4068-aaa2-6b34c3e6b068-image.png
      I have a dyndns to connect to resource on my home lan, but as described, today I used actual WAN IP from my pfsense box.

      8649d4ac-2a12-4a4c-9c96-d184826d5794-image.png

      Rule:

      ebe63cd2-3844-48dc-91b8-adf81042ffe7-image.png

      Everything can be rebuilt!

      GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GertjanG
        Gertjan @Modesty
        last edited by

        The WAN IP of pfSense changed ?
        You have an upstream 'ISP' router ?
        You changed your ISP ?
        Your dyndns IP is correct = points to your WAN IP ?
        The trouble shooting guide couldn't help you ?
        You are using other pfSense packages ?

        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
        Edit : and where are the logs ??

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Modesty @Gertjan
          last edited by

          @gertjan thanks for your answer

          The WAN IP of pfSense changed ?

          Yes, but I have a dyn dns that i have controlled, my wan IP was corect when i testet the acces to the port

          You have an upstream 'ISP' router ?

          Yes, from ISP i have a router that is in bridge mode

          You changed your ISP ?

          No

          Your dyndns IP is correct = points to your WAN IP ?

          Yes

          The trouble shooting guide couldn't help you ?

          Not so far

          You are using other pfSense packages ?

          Yes: This is status now:
          e15c7802-dec9-4792-8311-e15af1f7c50f-image.png

          Everything can be rebuilt!

          GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • viktor_gV
            viktor_g Netgate
            last edited by

            What is your pfSense version?
            could be related to 2.5.1 port forwarding issue: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11805

            fireodoF M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GertjanG
              Gertjan @Modesty
              last edited by Gertjan

              @modesty said in Strange behaviour, NAT worked for 2 years, not anymore:

              yes, from ISP i have a router that is in bridge mode

              That device could be a router, but isn't. It's a 'modem' type device now.
              The advantage of q modem type device is : NAT setup is only done on pfSense.
              So it can't be part of the issue.

              But : one source of the issue can be 'not pfSense' related : some ISP's block some ports, like "25", "53", the NetBIOS ports, etc.

              edit : port 8282 should be ok ofcourse.

              No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
              Edit : and where are the logs ??

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fireodoF
                fireodo @viktor_g
                last edited by

                @viktor_g said in Strange behaviour, NAT worked for 2 years, not anymore:

                could be related to 2.5.1 port forwarding issue: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11805

                Hi, btw - is there a patch on the way?

                Regards,
                fireodo

                Kettop Mi4300YL CPU: i5-4300Y @ 1.60GHz RAM: 8GB Ethernet Ports: 4
                SSD: SanDisk pSSD-S2 16GB (ZFS) WiFi: WLE200NX
                pfsense 2.8.0 CE
                Packages: Apcupsd, Cron, Iftop, Iperf, LCDproc, Nmap, pfBlockerNG, RRD_Summary, Shellcmd, Snort, Speedtest, System_Patches.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  Modesty @viktor_g
                  last edited by

                  Hi @viktor_g

                  I have not updated pr today, I wait for patch:

                  7a14b32b-248c-462d-8f6c-e24ee39c3263-image.png

                  Everything can be rebuilt!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Modesty @Gertjan
                    last edited by

                    @gertjan said in Strange behaviour, NAT worked for 2 years, not anymore:

                    @modesty said in Strange behaviour, NAT worked for 2 years, not anymore:

                    yes, from ISP i have a router that is in bridge mode

                    That device could be a router, but isn't. It's a 'modem' type device now.
                    The advantage of q modem type device is : NAT setup is only done on pfSense.
                    So it can't be part of the issue.

                    But : one source of the issue can be 'not pfSense' related : some ISP's block some ports, like "25", "53", the NetBIOS ports, etc.

                    edit : port 8282 should be ok ofcourse.

                    The ISP router dont have the routing job, that is done by pfSense. I dont think I can blame ISP, port 8282 should not be one of the default blocked ports. I also have same problem on another port.

                    Everything can be rebuilt!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      Modesty
                      last edited by

                      SOLVED

                      Thanks for your help, by reading and thinking you helped me find the solution.

                      I found the fail!
                      It was done by myself.

                      I made a new NAT rule 3 weeks ago, in that rule i included port 8282 on block. I tuned the NAT rule, removed 8282 block, viola, all ports that I need to be open is now open:

                      5da1e541-e972-48d2-98b4-b221fb776202-image.png

                      Everything can be rebuilt!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.