Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE
-
@bingo600 I don't have many WIFI clients just my phone and my tablet. Speed wise the network card on the PFSENSE works just as good as the Cisco AP but the range is limited inside the room it is installed while the AP which is next to PFSENSE extends to the whole house.
What info regarding my setup do you require to troubleshoot ?
-
@biomecanoid81 said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
range is limited inside
In the nearby future : some one, probably a Swedish guy, will find out that humans have been living without any form of radio signals during their entire existence. Our atmosphere was protecting us from everything coming from 'the outside'.
The last 80 years or so, this changed radically. That is, the atmosphere and the presence of these radio signals.
Now, I do presume one thing : if possible, it would take many years for biological entities like humans to adopt to a alterations in their environment. It's part of the evolution process.Also, I presume that shareholders of any company do not like risks.
As a 'radio' (Wifi) company, would you limit the power of a radio transmitting device on purpose - or not ? Because their just might be this huge upcoming financial risk ...
As soon as the Swedish guy finds out, and proofs, that radio waves make you thin, fat, stupid, smart, sterile, friendly, aggressive, etc etc etc there will we mass class actions, and all radio company will get sued out of existence (staring with our ISP's, TV broadcasting corpartons, wireless phones companies, and Elon Musk will emigrate to Mars himself).
Because : many will say : "they didn't tell us that radical chances in our biological and physical environment does have an impact on everything".So, I stop my rant, and jump to the conclusion :
Some devices can't have their 'power' adjusted, or the needed settings are hidden for the end user, or it's limited on purpose.There is also a financial explanation : if the power or range is not enough, you could buy another device. The shareholders will thank you.
I do fully understand that a firewall router device like pfSense, coupled with high end AP would be very popular. Companies know this for sure. Still, as far as I know, these devices do not really exist.
-
@gertjan said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
As soon as the Swedish guy finds out, and proofs, that radio waves make you thin, fat, stupid, smart, sterile, friendly, aggressive, etc
Of course, we all know 5G causes COVID.
The government specifies allowed signal strength, so health effects are unlikely. Regardless, placing an AP high up and well away from people will result in less radiation affecting someone than one sitting on a desk, as the signal strength attenuates with the square of distance.
-
@biomecanoid81 said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
Speed wise the network card on the PFSENSE works just as good as the Cisco AP
You much have a really OLD AP.. Or really old phone and tablet, or really slow internet.. If your fine with the speeds you could get with a card in pfsense.
-
@johnpoz My internet is 100mbps, My Phone is the LGK10 (2017), The access point is Cisco WAP4410N.
-
And your getting 100mbps over wireless with N? Not really possible with 2.4 and 20mhz channels but yeah with a 5ghz 40 VHT and seeing a PHY of 300 - yeah 100 would be doable.
Modern AC which have to assume a phone from even 2017 should be able to do is very common to see 200+ mbps.. I see 400mbps over wifi easy on pretty much all my modern devices.
My internet is 500mbps, but I guess if you only have 100 doesn't really matter all that much.
-
@johnpoz The important devices are hardwired to get the full internet speed so the WiFi is just for phones and tablets In reality you don't do much with mobile devices
-
@biomecanoid81 said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
phones and tablets In reality you don't do much with mobile devices
Very true.. Very true.. Unless your streaming high bitrate media. But if you have limited wifi devices that do not require this.. Then you make a valid point.. The problem many users fall into is the wifi is shared, and they have lots of wifi devices.. So the need to up the overall available shared bandwidth is more important. Or they have devices that can use more bandwidth that are wifi, their tvs, their media sticks, etc. Multiple ones in different parts of the house that could be streaming at the same time HD media, etc.
Also users seem to hate having a high speed internet connection, but when they test on their wifi device they only see a fraction of this.
But yes your point is very valid that mobile devices - depending on use don't need all that much to make a phone call, or check their email or surf the web, or even make a facetime call, etc.
-
More details
-
No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
Edit : and where are the logs ?? -
Yeah makes no sense to point to so many dns. For starters if some filter and others don't - you can not be sure if your going to be filtered or not.. I see some opendns in there. And quad9 filters, etc.
Also once you point to an anycast service - its pretty pointless to have more than 1 entry for the service.
And your not using local at all - guess you don't want to resolve any local stuff?
-
I use this as AP and it works flawlessly and covers just about every inch of the house.
https://www.asus.com/dk/Networking-IoT-Servers/Range-Extenders-/All-series/RP-AX56/
AP mode and DHCP and then you plug it in the wall socket and connect a cable to LAN. Boom and be done with it.
-
@gertjan Well I guess its a little bit better than giving it to my provider LOL
-
@johnpoz said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
Yeah makes no sense to point to so many dns. For starters if some filter and others don't - you can not be sure if your going to be filtered or not.. I see some opendns in there. And quad9 filters, etc.
Also once you point to an anycast service - its pretty pointless to have more than 1 entry for the service.
And your not using local at all - guess you don't want to resolve any local stuff?
I have the habit of using IPs instead of DNS for my local stuff
-
Well I may have too many DNS entries, I can take them off., but really its not harming the performance of the internet.
The only problem I have with my PFSENSE is the WiFi other than that I am happy
-
@cool_corona said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
https://www.asus.com/dk/Networking-IoT-Servers/Range-Extenders-/All-series/RP-AX56/
Looks like a nice AP but I already have several APs I can use, I have a Cisco, Miktrotik, Netgear.
I just wanted and all in one solution, a solution to integrate the AP into my PFSENSE. -
@biomecanoid81 said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
I just wanted and all in one solution
No point to that - just use an AP.. Which you can properly place or have multiple ones. I have 3 AP properly mounted in the ceiling in my small house. Have ZERO wifi issues no matter what room I am in, or even out on the patio, etc.
As to using IP vs fqdn - that works - but why? When properly setup you could use either.
As to coverage and features for wifi, your not going to get that with some card you place in pfsense vs an actual device designed to be an AP. or wifi router your using as an AP.
-
@biomecanoid81 said in Limited WiFi Range on PFSENSE:
AR9285
Is that a 1x1 device? Do you have a single antenna? Is the driver configured to use the correct antenna if it has more than one socket? That will destroy the range if set wrong, I have seen it first hand.
Currently about the best card you can get for pfSense directly is something AR938X based. That's a 3x3 N card. Coverage should be OK with decent antennas and the device itself mounted high up. Speed will never be anything special but should be 'enough' on a 100Mbps WAN.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 Only one socket for antenna, I don't know if any driver settings are wrong but based on limited Wi-Fi range it works like it does not use the antenna
-
WiFi devices often use multiple antennas for MIMO. A single antenna can't do that and so wouldn't be as effective as a multiple antenna system that does.
