Crashdump 2.5.2-RELEASE
-
Hello. This unit has been very reliable for years and I recently upgraded from the 2.4.x builds and this has happened I think twice. Thanks for your help in advance.
info.0
textdump.tar.0
info.1.0
textdump.tar.1.0 -
The backtrace of both panics is the same but it's not one I recognize. Though it is fairly deep in kernel memory handling and not in a place likely to have a bug.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor write data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff81202d5d stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe001d06f900 frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe001d06fcb0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 21 (dom0) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 1 time = 1627446085 KDB: enter: panic
db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt Tracing pid 21 tid 100129 td 0xfffff80007357740 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x37/frame 0xfffffe001d06f5c0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x197/frame 0xfffffe001d06f610 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe001d06f670 trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x391/frame 0xfffffe001d06f6d0 trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0x4f/frame 0xfffffe001d06f720 trap() at trap+0x286/frame 0xfffffe001d06f830 calltrap() at calltrap+0x8/frame 0xfffffe001d06f830 --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff81202d5d, rsp = 0xfffffe001d06f900, rbp = 0xfffffe001d06fcb0 --- vm_pageout_worker() at vm_pageout_worker+0xecd/frame 0xfffffe001d06fcb0 vm_pageout() at vm_pageout+0x193/frame 0xfffffe001d06fcf0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7e/frame 0xfffffe001d06fd30 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe001d06fd30 --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0, rbp = 0 ---
Difficult to say what it might be based on that alone. Any other symptoms before it crashes? Is there something in particular it's doing when the crash happens?
-
@jimp Hey Jim. No it's only after I log into it randomly to make changes when it pops up and tells me it has crashed. I mean it's still running fine when I log into it. Should I format and reinstall from scratch using 2.5.2 installer since this was an 2.4.x upgrade? Replace the SSD?
Thanks.
-
The error doesn't lead me to think it's disk related, so a reinstall or new SSD wouldn't likely make a difference. It could be something else in hardware, but typically hardware-related crashes are more random than this. May still be worth running a memory and CPU test on it if you can.
A fresh install wouldn't hurt anything, so you can do that if you like, but I'm not confident it would be relevant here.
-
@jimp Well what do you know... I restarted it and ran the built in memtest and it's memory error city. Thanks for the tip! I'll chunk it.