Original Intel EXPI9404PTG2L20 EXPI9404PT PRO/1000 PT vs Fujitsu PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Gigabit Network Card PCI-E D2745-A11 low profile
-
What is real difference in network performance (in real life complicated environment, i.e. a lot of packets different sizes, etc...) between this one
Original Intel EXPI9404PTG2L20 EXPI9404PT PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Server Adapter
Intel 82571GB
Launch Date Q1'07
PCIe 1.0a
Specification
Specification 2and this one
Fujitsu PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Gigabit Network Card PCI-E D2745-A11 low profile
Intel 82580eB
Launch Date Q4'10 (?)
PCIe 2.0
Specification?
From engineering point of view I also see a less electronic components on FUJITSU branded version. (3 Year difference in launch date,- big gap for nowadays....)
-
Any opinion or suggestion ?
-
You are basically looking at this:
https://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/products/compare.html?productIds=41280,20720PCIe 1 vs 2
Some virtualisation support in the 82580.
But 82571 is an em(4) NIC but 82580 is an igb(4) muti-queue NIC. If you have multiple CPU cores that is going to load them far more efficiently.
I'd get the newer card given a choice.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in Original Intel EXPI9404PTG2L20 EXPI9404PT PRO/1000 PT vs Fujitsu PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Gigabit Network Card PCI-E D2745-A11 low profile:
You are basically looking at this:
https://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/products/compare.html?productIds=41280,20720PCIe 1 vs 2
Some virtualisation support in the 82580.
But 82571 is an em(4) NIC but 82580 is an igb(4) muti-queue NIC. If you have multiple CPU cores that is going to load them far more efficiently.
I'd get the newer card given a choice.
Steve
Dear Steve!
Thank You so much for detailed answering.
I keep in memory about 82580 igb(4) multi-Queue, but anyway asking people’s with better knowledge. ;)
