No access to WAN from LAN1,LAN2, but LAN0 works
-
I just installed pfSense 2.5.2 on a Protectli vault (FW4B) and while LAN1 just works right out of the box I am struggling with how to get both LAN2 and LAN3 to be able to route to the WAN as well.
My FW4B interfaces have been renamed, associated with a network port, and have all been enabled
LAN ->LAN1, 192.168.1.1 <--Works out of the box
OPT1->LAN2, 192.168.2.1 <--Does not Work
OPT2->LAN3, 192.168.3.1 <--Does not WorkMy objective here is to segregate all my untrusted WiFi and IoT devices onto their own subnets where I can then lock them down and monitor in fine detail what they are doing. No more doorbells ringing in the middle of the night when nobody is even at the door. I've had it with plug-and-play devices that you can not control other than pulling the plug.
I have seen suggestions other sites who have have simply bridged their LAN interfaces together but I actually want to keep them segregated from my more important office equipment. Try as I may I have been unable to get my LAN2 or LAN3 interfaces to even connect through to the WAN/Internet.
I have no doubt the problem is "user error" but I can not for the life of me figure out what is needed to get the other two interfaces to route properly. I don't see anything different from the LAN1 settings but under Status/Interfaces I do see "no carrier" for both non-working interfaces. The devices connected to them both work fine when connected to LAN1 but they are not seeing anything with LAN2 or LAN3. (see below edit on the carrier)
Q1: What is the bare minimum needed to get these other two interfaces to route to the WAN?
If I can just get that far I can at least start collecting some network traffic data and figure out some filtering rules for the impending lockdown.
Thanks,
Steve
Edit: The No-carrier was just due to the devices attached going to sleep. The link says "up" once the device is awake.
-
@scoleman Have you added firewall rules on the LAN2, LAN3 tabs to allow access? Only LAN1 gets an allow rule by default.
-
@kom Thank you! You were correct. It took me a while to find the existing rules and duplicate them for the other two interfaces. I obviously have a lot to learn about pfsense.
I now have one of my two WiFi hubs online so I can start to play with it. This is very different from the iptables that I am used to.
Thanks!