Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Netgate 6100

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    16 Posts 2 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      Gerry26500
      last edited by

      interfaces.png
      Hi, I switched from SG1100 to SG6100 and I m having a hard time to get the trunk working.
      See attached screenshot.
      I created a bunch of vlan and added the interfaces on igc0 (Lan port)
      My understanding was that should create a trunk and allow those vlan to pass.
      The config on the switch connected to the lan port is
      interface gigabitethernet1
      description uplink-FW
      switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10,20,30,40

      Do you have any idea what I am doing wrong ?
      Thanks

      keyserK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • keyserK
        keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
        last edited by

        @gerald26500 Seems right if there is no intention to use the native VLAN on the switch trunk, and consequently not use the Interface named LAN in your pfSense config.
        If it was me, I would make VLAN 10 native on the switch Trunk, and call your currently marked LAN interface LOCAL instead.
        (And make no VLAN 10 interface). That way you do not have a stranded LAN interface.

        Are you sure you are linking the switchport to the correct LAN port on the 6100? As far as remember it’s the one named LAN1 on the backside.

        Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          Gerry26500 @keyser
          last edited by

          @keyser Thanks for the input.
          the LAN interface actually have a IP (10.10.70.1) which is the management vlan and the native vlan on the switch.
          Yes I am connected to LAN1
          Do you think it would work if I assigned all the vlan to igc1 (port LAN2 on the backside)?

          keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • keyserK
            keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
            last edited by keyser

            @gerald26500 Okay - that is kind of weird. That should work just fine then. How are you diagnosing the “problem”? Is it perhaps a lack of firewall rules to allow any traffic on the VLAN interfaces?

            Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • keyserK
              keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
              last edited by keyser

              @gerald26500 said in Netgate 6100:

              interfaces.png
              Hi, I switched from SG1100 to SG6100 and I m having a hard time to get the trunk working.
              See attached screenshot.
              I created a bunch of vlan and added the interfaces on igc0 (Lan port)
              My understanding was that should create a trunk and allow those vlan to pass.
              The config on the switch connected to the lan port is
              interface gigabitethernet1
              description uplink-FW
              switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10,20,30,40

              Do you have any idea what I am doing wrong ?
              Thanks

              Ohh, just read your switch config again. There is no “switchport mode trunk” statement. Depending on the switch you might also have to declare the “switchport mode trunk encapsulation dot1q” statement. With that config (again depending on the switch) the port is still in access mode, and only your management VLAN is up (untagged). You would need to use the native vlan statement to have your management VLAN native on the trunk.

              Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                Gerry26500 @keyser
                last edited by

                @keyser said in Netgate 6100:

                500 Okay - that is kind of weird. That should work just fine then. How are you diagnosing the “problem”? Is it perhaps a lack of firewall rules to allow any traffic on the VLAN interfaces?

                yes , it is weird , I was convinced that I had the right config.
                I have allow any on each VLAN for the FW rule (As I thought too that it could be the issue)
                I cannot ping any gateway from any device .. as if the routing or the trunk wasn't working.

                keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • keyserK
                  keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                  last edited by

                  @gerald26500 Did you see the second post I made before your reply?

                  Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    Gerry26500 @keyser
                    last edited by

                    @keyser said in Netgate 6100:

                    would need to use the native vlan statement to have your management VLAN native on

                    Yeah , it;s one of those old cisco switch , even though I enter the command it won't show up .
                    It was working fine with the SG1100 ./. I am so confused
                    homenet-sw1(config-if)#int gi1
                    homenet-sw1(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
                    homenet-sw1(config-if)#
                    homenet-sw1(config-if)#
                    homenet-sw1(config-if)#exit
                    homenet-sw1(config)#do sh run int gi1
                    interface gigabitethernet1
                    description uplink-FW
                    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10,20,30,40,60,99
                    switchport trunk native vlan 70
                    !
                    homenet-sw1(config)#

                    keyserK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • keyserK
                      keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                      last edited by keyser

                      @gerald26500 I can’t quite remember those old cisco’s, but you might need to make the statement as follows:
                      Switchport mode trunk encapsulation dot1q

                      I think there was some very early models where it dit not work with standard dot1q equipment without that statement.

                      Edit: and i think you need to add vlan 70 to the allow list as well

                      Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • keyserK
                        keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                        last edited by

                        @gerald26500 Last but not least - have you tried rebooting the sg-6100? I have from time to time seen config changes that would not “engage” before the box was rebooted. especially around interfaces.

                        Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          Gerry26500 @keyser
                          last edited by

                          @keyser
                          My switch OS version doesn't take "encapsulation dot1q" .. pls the trunk was working before.
                          I just restarted the SG6100 and still the same.

                          If I connected directly to it "bypass the switch" I can't even access internet.. there is a routing issue on the 6100.
                          I can't even ping the other interfaces IPs (even though the rules for each vlan is allow * *

                          Could you please confirm that enabling the interface and adding an IP to it creates a route for that subnet.

                          so basically WAN is connected outside (works fine, it gets an IP , no need to touch the FW rule for that)
                          then I have LAN port enable , with an IP in the Native vlan subnet
                          then few vlans, each created/associated under that LAN port, each with an IP on the interface.

                          Thanks again for your time

                          keyserK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • keyserK
                            keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                            last edited by

                            @gerald26500 said in Netgate 6100:

                            @keyser
                            My switch OS version doesn't take "encapsulation dot1q" .. pls the trunk was working before.
                            I just restarted the SG6100 and still the same.

                            If I connected directly to it "bypass the switch" I can't even access internet.. there is a routing issue on the 6100.
                            I can't even ping the other interfaces IPs (even though the rules for each vlan is allow * *

                            Could you please confirm that enabling the interface and adding an IP to it creates a route for that subnet.

                            so basically WAN is connected outside (works fine, it gets an IP , no need to touch the FW rule for that)
                            then I have LAN port enable , with an IP in the Native vlan subnet
                            then few vlans, each created/associated under that LAN port, each with an IP on the interface.

                            Thanks again for your time

                            I can confirm assigning an interface, enabling it and giving it an IP creates the needed routing to access WAIN (and the other interfaces if firewall rules allow).

                            Your issue sounds almost as if the machine you are pinging from does not belong to the IP subnet of the interface it’s connected to (de facto isolated). Does your client get a DHCP IP from the DHCP server in pfSense, or have you given it a static Ip yourself? If so, my guess is you entered it wrong, or gave a wrong subnet/default gateway.

                            Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • keyserK
                              keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                              last edited by

                              @gerald26500 In fact, if you can ping the default gateway from the client, but nothing else, my guess is your subnet mask or default gatway is wrong on the client.

                              Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                Gerry26500 @keyser
                                last edited by

                                @keyser Very strange , my client is getting the IP and subnet throught DHCP from the LAN interface
                                I am getting 10.10.70.10 (because my DHCP range is 10 to 100) mask 255.255.255.0 (because I chose /24) and gateway 10.10.70.1

                                I am that close to factory reset yet again and start over with no vlans no subnets etc .. maybe i just got a defective box :(

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • G
                                  Gerry26500 @keyser
                                  last edited by

                                  @keyser Oh man , I feel so stupid.
                                  Il all FW rules I had IPV4 TCP ... instead of IPV4 *
                                  so all good now
                                  I really appreciate your help though !
                                  Thanks!

                                  keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • keyserK
                                    keyser Rebel Alliance @Gerry26500
                                    last edited by

                                    @gerald26500 said in Netgate 6100:

                                    @keyser Oh man , I feel so stupid.
                                    Il all FW rules I had IPV4 TCP ... instead of IPV4 *
                                    so all good now
                                    I really appreciate your help though !
                                    Thanks!

                                    😂 Those things happens to all of us. As Long as it works as intended all is good👍

                                    Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.