Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    High Availability port forward to VIP -am i doing this right?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    13 Posts 2 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      digger30
      last edited by digger30

      I have a server running behind my firewall and when the master FW fails and the slave FW takes over, my server is no longer accessible from the outside world.

      If i setup my ISP modem to port forward to my shared VIP, the server is no longer accessible from outside.
      It will only work if i port forward to the master FW IP but obviously when the slave FW takes over it has a different IP so this doesnt work

      Is this a NAT / Rule issue or am i doing something wrong?

      Modem:
      3.png

      This works
      1.png

      This is what i've tried to do which doesnt work
      2.png

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
        last edited by

        @digger30 What's the type of VIP you have for 192.168.1.1? It has to be a CARP VIP.

        Ryan
        Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
        Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
        Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
        Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
          last edited by digger30

          @rcoleman-netgate said in High Availability port forward to VIP -am i doing this right?:

          e a CARP VIP.

          yes it is a CARP VIP

          The outgoing internet still works on when the slave FW takes over so i'm just wondering have i made a config error or am i trying the impossible?

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
            last edited by

            @digger30 When you do the traffic push, what do you get on a packet capture? I would run it on both systems.

            Are they reporting properly as BACKUP and PRIMARY when you load CARP Status?

            Ryan
            Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
            Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
            Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
            Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

            D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
              last edited by

              @rcoleman-netgate Yes master FW is showing master status and the slave is showing BACKUP status.

              The slave updates correctly to MASTER status when it takes over

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
                last edited by

                @rcoleman-netgate said in High Availability port forward to VIP -am i doing this right?:

                When you do the traffic push, what do you get on a packet capture? I would run it on both systems.

                i'll try this

                Just checking am i right in thinking that diagram 2 with the port forward to the shared VIP is the correct way to do this?

                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
                  last edited by

                  @digger30 Not shared, really. Only Primary will get it.

                  Ryan
                  Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                  Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                  Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                  Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
                    last edited by digger30

                    @rcoleman-netgate Sorry unsure what you mean

                    Should i put my router port forward to my VIP 192.168.1.1 in order for this to work as below?

                    2.png

                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
                      last edited by

                      @digger30

                      HA isn't Clustering.

                      HA means if FW1 goes down FW2 will take over.

                      https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/highavailability/index.html

                      Ryan
                      Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                      Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                      Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                      Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
                        last edited by digger30

                        @rcoleman-netgate yes i dont expect it to cluster, just the Slave FW has a different IP so unsure how to make the modem port foward to it once it takes over? I thought by forward to a VIP which is used by the master, the slave would then take over the VIP when it becomes the master FW?1.png

                        In the diagram below would you be able to port forward to 198.51.100.200 or would you only be able to port forward to 198.51.100.201 or .202 at one time only meaning HA fails when the master .201 FW goes down?

                        diagrams-example-carp.png

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
                          last edited by

                          @digger30 Your destination on HA should always be the CARP address, not the destination firewall. If you do the firewall you will never achieve failover.

                          Ryan
                          Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                          Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                          Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                          Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • D
                            digger30 @rcoleman-netgate
                            last edited by

                            @rcoleman-netgate
                            All sorted :)

                            thanks for your help

                            The PFsense internal NAT port forward destination address had to be changed from WAN address to the VIP IP which is now working

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rcoleman-netgate Netgate @digger30
                              last edited by

                              @digger30 Perfect! Glad I could be of assistance.

                              Ryan
                              Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                              Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                              Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                              Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.