• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Using a Mobile 4G Router as a Modem with pfSense?

General pfSense Questions
3
6
1.5k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    Telmap85
    last edited by Telmap85 Aug 4, 2022, 10:12 PM Aug 4, 2022, 10:07 PM

    I will have to work for some time from a remote location without broadband access but with 4G mobile network connectivity in the area.

    I am currently using a TP-Link mobile mini router with 1 ethernet port and 1 USB connector for a 4G LTE USB modem. This setup works ok with my laptop. However, the configuration options of this TP-Link router and the internal firewall is quite limited and it does not give you much visibility of what is happening in the network.

    So I thought about connecting the TP-Link router with the 4G modem to a small pfSense box on the WAN port to get mobile Internet, give it a fixed IP and then let pfSense act as a DHCP server and main firewall. The pfSense box would then be connected on the LAN port to a small switch to connect the laptop, while the TP-Link mobile router just acts as a modem.

    Would that be a valid approach?

    I appreciate your feedback.

    C 1 Reply Last reply Aug 4, 2022, 10:49 PM Reply Quote 0
    • C
      chpalmer @Telmap85
      last edited by Aug 4, 2022, 10:49 PM

      @telmap85 Absolutely. I do this quite often. See if the modem can be put in bridge mode if you can. If not just verify that the LAN of the modem is a different subnet than the pfSense router LAN.

      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

      T 1 Reply Last reply Aug 5, 2022, 12:59 AM Reply Quote 1
      • T
        Telmap85 @chpalmer
        last edited by Telmap85 Aug 5, 2022, 1:00 AM Aug 5, 2022, 12:59 AM

        @chpalmer The portable TP-Link 4G router seems to have 3 modes of operation:

        • 3G/4G Router
        • WISP Client Router
        • Access Point (AP or Repeater/Bridge)

        Now the problem with the bridge mode as an access point is that it only seems to allow to extend an existing wireless network (wifi) and then connect a wired-only device to the internet. But I actually need the 4G connection from the modem, which does not appear to allow a bridge mode.

        So I guess I need to operate the TP-Link router in the "3G/4G Router" mode but with DHCP disabled on a different subnet than the pfSense box and with a fixed IP assigned by pfSense?

        C 1 Reply Last reply Aug 5, 2022, 4:04 AM Reply Quote 0
        • C
          chpalmer @Telmap85
          last edited by Aug 5, 2022, 4:04 AM

          @telmap85 It wouldn't be a WIFI option.. You simply want to take the router function out of the modem.. if it is an option on that model.. otherwise it will still work but you would be double NAT..

          https://labjack.com/support/suggested-travel-routerswifi-bridges

          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

          T 1 Reply Last reply Aug 5, 2022, 8:56 PM Reply Quote 1
          • T
            Telmap85 @chpalmer
            last edited by Telmap85 Aug 5, 2022, 9:20 PM Aug 5, 2022, 8:56 PM

            @chpalmer it's this model:

            https://www.tp-link.com/uk/support/download/tl-mr3020/

            If there is no bridge mode, what are the performance and security disadvantages of a double NAT setup?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by Aug 5, 2022, 9:50 PM

              Minimal. Somethings don't work well (or at all) behind double NAT. Mostly things that require NAT workarounds like UPnP.
              Has no impact on security (arguably improves it!) and performance impact is usually minimal as long as the upstream router does not restrict the throughput. Some SOHO routers have very limit state tables for example.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              1 out of 6
              • First post
                1/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.