Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Load balancing on multi WAN with same gateway address

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    9 Posts 2 Posters 4.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      plasticWan
      last edited by

      Hello,

      I followed this tutorial (http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing) to setup the load balancer on a pfSense 1.2.3-RC1. I'm trying to balance 5 cable WANs, but I'm doing it with only 2 at the moment for testing.

      The problem is my ISP provided me with the worst piece of router you could imagine for each WAN, and this s*** only allows subnet on 192.168.0.0/24 ("192.168.0" is hard written in the config panel). Moreover, the subnet bit count cannot be set, only the DHCP start and addresses count may be set. :-\

      I can't see how to set the gateway address either, which makes me think it's just impossible. So the trick is how to set 5 WANs, with 5 monitor IPs in a load balancing pool when all WANs have the gateway 192.168.0.1 ? ???

      The result (for now) is that all requests always go through the same WAN, the first. Any idea of how I could fix this ?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • chpalmerC
        chpalmer
        last edited by

        Who is your ISP?

        What modem are you using?  Separate modem and router or "Cable Gateway"?

        Triggering snowflakes one by one..
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          plasticWan
          last edited by

          It is a french ISP : Numericable

          And I guess the modems are what you call "cable gateways"
          The brand is "CASTELNET" and I can't find any docs…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • chpalmerC
            chpalmer
            last edited by

            I only found this

            http://www.micro-astuce.com/Forum/topic3459.html

            Its not related but helps me to know that your modem is also a router.

            Problem is that all your WAN ports are pointed at the same "Gateway Address".  The "Load Balancer" wont work with that.

            What I would suggest, is to see if your ISP would let you use a simple bridge modem. Then they would need to give you IP addresses with different gateway addresses.  My ISP here will do that…  Yours may not.  Then a simple switch between your modem and your pfSense box. Then set up your wan ports with your public ip addresses.

            This config may not get you much however unless your trying to get by their use limits.

            Triggering snowflakes one by one..
            Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • chpalmerC
              chpalmer
              last edited by

              http://www.castlenet.com.tw/

              Heres their website

              Triggering snowflakes one by one..
              Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                plasticWan
                last edited by

                Thank you for your replies !

                Regarding your second link my router seems to be a CBW560, but still no doc.

                So yes it is a router, and I don't think I can make it work in bridge mode to configure my public IPs in pfSense. But your first lik shows how to set the gateway address in the router config.

                So setting the gateway address and IP count I think I could go along with this config :

                WAN
                Gateway: 192.168.0.32/27
                DHCP: 192.168.0.33 - 192.168.0.63

                WAN2
                Gateway: 192.168.0.64/27
                DHCP: 192.168.0.65 - 192.168.0.95

                WAN3
                Gateway: 192.168.0.96/27
                DHCP: 192.168.0.97 - 192.168.0.127

                WAN4
                Gateway: 192.168.0.128/27
                DHCP: 192.168.0.129 - 192.168.0.159

                WAN5
                Gateway: 192.168.0.160/27
                DHCP: 192.168.0.161 - 192.168.0.191

                If I can configure this properly with those crappy routers, I guess it should work. Shouldn't it ?  :-
                I'm gonna try this and post the answer when/if I find it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • chpalmerC
                  chpalmer
                  last edited by

                  Nice.  ;D

                  Let us know if it works…    :)

                  Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                  Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    plasticWan
                    last edited by

                    So…

                    I checked this out it occurred that the IP of the router cannot be changed.
                    After a quick call to my ISP, I learned that the routers have some kind of "super admin mode" (or mega-supra-giga-mode, since it ables to change the router's address :o).

                    Moreover, with this mode, I've been able to put my 5 routers in bridge mode, so pfSense get 5 public IPs, which is more comfortable. The interfaces are connected with DHCP but two of them get the same gateway, so it's still a problem, but the other 4 work fine.

                    But now all request go through interface 2, so load balancing doesn't seem to be working still...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      plasticWan
                      last edited by

                      End of story :

                      Now my 5 WAN balance like a charm. All I had to do is to remove the default rule on the WAN firewall…
                      Maybe a good thing to a in tutorials.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.