• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Errors out going up of pfsense VM when saturating LAN interface

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
15 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views 3 Watching
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    Cool_Corona @netnerdy
    last edited by Nov 2, 2022, 8:10 AM

    @netnerdy Thats normal because all traffic gets bogged down when the link is saturated.

    N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 2, 2022, 6:44 PM Reply Quote 0
    • N Offline
      netnerdy @Cool_Corona
      last edited by Nov 2, 2022, 6:44 PM

      @cool_corona It does not seem normal from my tests. i have used pfsense for years on different platforms. I didn’t see this behavior when I ran pfsense on bare metal or esxi or older versions of proxmox.

      Thats why I also created a vanilla freebsd vm to do the same tests. Freebsd does not show the same kind of errors when running iperf.

      V 1 Reply Last reply Nov 2, 2022, 7:12 PM Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        viragomann @netnerdy
        last edited by Nov 2, 2022, 7:12 PM

        @netnerdy
        Did you enable hardware checksum offloading in the system advanced settings?

        N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 3, 2022, 1:00 AM Reply Quote 0
        • S Online
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by Nov 2, 2022, 9:35 PM

          Do you have flow control set the same on each?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N Offline
            netnerdy @viragomann
            last edited by Nov 3, 2022, 1:00 AM

            @viragomann Yes I have tried enabling/disabling both tcp segmentation and hw checksum, but no avail.

            below is ifconfig output. vtnet0 is WAN, vtnet1 is LAN. My WAN and LAN both use vlans btw.

            vtnet0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=900b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,LINKSTATE>

            vtnet1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=900b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,LINKSTATE>

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Online
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by stephenw10 Nov 3, 2022, 12:54 PM Nov 3, 2022, 12:52 PM

              Are you actually seeing traffic dropped?

              Can you see what type of errors they are in the output of sysctl dev.vtnet.0?

              N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 4, 2022, 4:54 AM Reply Quote 0
              • N Offline
                netnerdy @stephenw10
                last edited by netnerdy Nov 4, 2022, 4:55 AM Nov 4, 2022, 4:54 AM

                @stephenw10 Flow control is off for Hypervisor raw interface. does vtnet have its own flow control setting?

                Right now, error count is at 967 (i had to restart my machine). here is sysctl:

                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.rescheduled: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.tso: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.csum: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.omcasts: 103
                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.obytes: 7095877990
                dev.vtnet.1.txq0.opackets: 14070402
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.rescheduled: 143
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.csum_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.csum: 2228565
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.ierrors: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.iqdrops: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.ibytes: 16575625620
                dev.vtnet.1.rxq0.ipackets: 12832966
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_task_rescheduled: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_tso_offloaded: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_csum_offloaded: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_defrag_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_defragged: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_tso_not_tcp: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_tso_bad_ethtype: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.tx_csum_bad_ethtype: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_task_rescheduled: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_offloaded: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_bad_proto: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_bad_offset: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_bad_ipproto: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_csum_bad_ethtype: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_mergeable_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_enq_replacement_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.rx_frame_too_large: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.mbuf_alloc_failed: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.act_vq_pairs: 1
                dev.vtnet.1.requested_vq_pairs: 0
                dev.vtnet.1.max_vq_pairs: 1
                dev.vtnet.1.%parent: virtio_pci3
                dev.vtnet.1.%pnpinfo:
                dev.vtnet.1.%location:
                dev.vtnet.1.%driver: vtnet
                dev.vtnet.1.%desc: VirtIO Networking Adapter

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Online
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by Nov 4, 2022, 4:47 PM

                  Hmm, nothing shown there...

                  Are you seeing that only on vtnet1?

                  Are you actually seeing connection dropped when the error rate is increasing?

                  N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 4, 2022, 4:52 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • N Offline
                    netnerdy @stephenw10
                    last edited by Nov 4, 2022, 4:52 PM

                    @stephenw10 5F159528-72B7-4B21-9CCC-0410F635C5EA.jpeg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Online
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by Nov 4, 2022, 5:50 PM

                      Ah, that looks like LAN is actually vtnet0. Can we see the sysctl output for that?

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 5, 2022, 2:52 AM Reply Quote 0
                      • N Offline
                        netnerdy @stephenw10
                        last edited by Nov 5, 2022, 2:52 AM

                        @stephenw10

                        nope LAN is on vtnet1.

                        5e7707f8-32e5-4f30-b1b2-a816ee0ad190-image.png

                        this is the sysctl output for vtnet0

                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.rescheduled: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.tso: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.csum: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.omcasts: 1139
                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.obytes: 10781607078
                        dev.vtnet.0.txq0.opackets: 16092681
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.rescheduled: 21
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.csum_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.csum: 16804156
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.ierrors: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.iqdrops: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.ibytes: 29382393539
                        dev.vtnet.0.rxq0.ipackets: 26088829
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_task_rescheduled: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_tso_offloaded: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_csum_offloaded: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_defrag_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_defragged: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_tso_not_tcp: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_tso_bad_ethtype: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.tx_csum_bad_ethtype: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_task_rescheduled: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_offloaded: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_bad_proto: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_bad_offset: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_bad_ipproto: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_csum_bad_ethtype: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_mergeable_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_enq_replacement_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.rx_frame_too_large: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.mbuf_alloc_failed: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.act_vq_pairs: 1
                        dev.vtnet.0.requested_vq_pairs: 0
                        dev.vtnet.0.max_vq_pairs: 1
                        dev.vtnet.0.%parent: virtio_pci2
                        dev.vtnet.0.%pnpinfo:
                        dev.vtnet.0.%location:
                        dev.vtnet.0.%driver: vtnet
                        dev.vtnet.0.%desc: VirtIO Networking Adapter

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Online
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by Nov 5, 2022, 3:46 PM

                          Hmm, interesting the in/out bytes in your screenshot for WAN lined up exactly with the sysctl output for vtnet1. Just coincidence perhaps? Were those takes at approximately the same time?

                          You still haven't said if you're actually seeing connections drop when you see those errors?

                          Steve

                          N 1 Reply Last reply Nov 6, 2022, 6:12 AM Reply Quote 0
                          • N Offline
                            netnerdy @stephenw10
                            last edited by Nov 6, 2022, 6:12 AM

                            @stephenw10 They were taken at different times. It must have been a coincidence.

                            How would I know which connections have dropped? Tcps auto retry anyway. Only weirdness i feel i have is my dns queries sometimes don’t resolve intermittently.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S Online
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by Nov 6, 2022, 8:14 PM

                              Ah, OK do you see anything in the sysctls that looks like the same error count shown in the interface status?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              15 out of 15
                              • First post
                                15/15
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                consent.not_received