Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Performance decrease comparing to 2.7.0

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved CE 2.7.0 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    9 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • nazar-pcN
      nazar-pc
      last edited by

      I have been benching multi-WAN with two gigabit connections on 2.6.0 and was getting these results (1.7Gbps/1.5Gbps): https://www.speedtest.net/result/13852922848

      Since then I upgraded CPU from i3-6098P (2C/4T) to i5-6500 (4C/4T) and pfSense 2.7.0 (latest as of right now, "built on Mon Dec 12 06:07:23 UTC 2022") and speeds are much lower now: https://www.speedtest.net/result/14066031908

      It doesn't make a lot of sense that significantly faster CPU would result in slower pfSense operation, so I believe it is related to hardware upgrade, must be software.
      I'm sorry I didn't test before upgrading to 2.7.0 to remove software variable.

      Or are these test builds compiled with fewer optimizations and are expected to be slower?

      pfSense runs in a Qemu 7.1.0 VM under libvirt with virtio interfaces. Nothing special.

      I see that it is using almost all CPU (4 cores) by interrupts.

      Cool_CoronaC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Cool_CoronaC
        Cool_Corona @nazar-pc
        last edited by

        @nazar-pc What are the clock speed of the 2 cpu's compared?

        nazar-pcN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • nazar-pcN
          nazar-pc @Cool_Corona
          last edited by

          @cool_corona said in Performance decrease comparing to 2.7.0:

          @nazar-pc What are the clock speed of the 2 cpu's compared?

          Specs online:

          • https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/93366/intel-core-i36098p-processor-3m-cache-3-60-ghz/specifications.html
          • https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/88184/intel-core-i56500-processor-6m-cache-up-to-3-60-ghz.html

          The old one is 3.6GHz, the new one is 3.2GHz base and 3.6GHz boost speed. New CPU has double the CPU cache and a bit higher TDP, but otherwise the same microarchitecture.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            Development snapshots have debugging options enabled in the kernel which will have a significant performance impact.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            nazar-pcN T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • nazar-pcN
              nazar-pc @jimp
              last edited by

              @jimp said in Performance decrease comparing to 2.7.0:

              Development snapshots have debugging options enabled in the kernel which will have a significant performance impact.

              Makes sense, waiting for the release then

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                Tekjunkie28 @jimp
                last edited by

                @jimp Any idea how much performance impact debugging has?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  We haven't made any attempts to measure the exact difference.

                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  nazar-pcN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nazar-pcN
                    nazar-pc @jimp
                    last edited by

                    @jimp I know it is not a pleasant question to ask about timeline, but is there a tracker to follow the progress towards release of 2.7?
                    I'm currently kind of stuck with slower dev build, would be great to know how long it will last.

                    W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • W
                      weirdcrap @nazar-pc
                      last edited by

                      @nazar-pc https://redmine.pfsense.org/versions/70

                      I don't know if they're going for 100% resolution of bugs but I think that's the best we've got.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.