Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Poor wifi performance after upgrade of mesh system

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    46 Posts 7 Posters 8.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      Elmojo @rcoleman-netgate
      last edited by

      @rcoleman-netgate OK. I haven't been able to get the upload directly option to work. I recall previously that I was told I had to upload images to a service and post the links, which is really annoying. I'd love to be able to just post them. I'll try again.
      What would you like me to do next, to get this sorted out?
      At the moment, I have the mesh plugged into my switch (served by the LAN interface), and it's working perfectly, but I would eventually like to have it served from OPT1 as described above, if possible. I do definitely need it to be on the same subnet as the rest of my network, though. If it will have to have a separate IP range from the LAN interface, that would be a deal breaker.

      J R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Jarhead @Elmojo
        last edited by

        @elmojo Why use OPT1 at all??
        Just plug it into your switch and be done.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rcoleman-netgate Netgate @Elmojo
          last edited by

          @elmojo said in Poor wifi performance after upgrade of mesh system:

          At the moment, I have the mesh plugged into my switch (served by the LAN interface), and it's working perfectly, but I would eventually like to have it served from OPT1 as described above, if possible. I do definitely need it to be on the same subnet as the rest of my network, though. If it will have to have a separate IP range from the LAN interface, that would be a deal breaker.

          Are you planning on doing specific filtering/PBR or other routing on the MESH users? If not then keep it on the switch.

          I do definitely need it to be on the same subnet as the rest of my network, though.

          You won't get this on OPT. You will need to make a bridge interface and that's not a good idea. pfSense is a router, not a switch.

          Ryan
          Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
          Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
          Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
          Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • E
            Elmojo @rcoleman-netgate
            last edited by

            @rcoleman-netgate Ok, I'll just leave it as-is and disable OPT1 again.
            It's been a while, so I can't recall the specifics, but when I first set this thing up, someone recommended that I have my wired clients on LAN through the switch, and my wireless clients (via mesh) on OPT1. I was under the impression that it was running that way all this time, but it seems that wasn't the case.
            What is OPT1 typically used for?

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              rcoleman-netgate Netgate @Elmojo
              last edited by

              @elmojo It would be an additional network... you can have them that way but they're on different broadcast domains -- so things that require broadcast calls (like streaming devices, or backup solutions) don't work and require other tools to work like avahi.

              I use VLANs and single interfaces and APs that support VLANs.

              Ryan
              Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
              Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
              Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
              Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Dobby_D
                Dobby_
                last edited by

                I was stumbling over that thread here and want to give my "two cents" on top of that.

                A real WiFi MESH network is using the HWMP (protocol)
                to guaranty a good working together between the devices
                with out no problems. "Some" vendors, as an example MikroTik, are setting up there own HWMP such HWMPplus
                from MikroTik, so it is not compatible to any other or normal HWMP protocol and only there own hardware,
                will work "nice" together. So if other vendors now also
                do something like that, configuring out there own version
                of the HWMP (protocol) it can be that then devices there
                are not only from one vendor, getting problems out here.

                #~. @Dobby

                Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.